Rupture process of the 2001 May 7 Mw 4.3 Ekofisk induced earthquake

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 187, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 407-413

  Cesca, S ^a   Dahm, T ^a   Juretzek, C ^a   Kuhn D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b NORSAR   (Norway)

Author keywords

Earthquake dynamics; Earthquake source observations

Indexed keywords

APPARENT SOURCE; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA SETS; EARTH MODELS; EARTHQUAKE DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKE SOURCE OBSERVATIONS; EASTERN SIDE; EPICENTRAL DISTANCES; EPICENTRE; FAILURE DYNAMICS; FOCAL MECHANISM; HORIZONTAL PLANES; LOVE WAVE; LOW FREQUENCY; LOW-VELOCITY; NORTH SEA; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; POINT SOURCES; RAYLEIGH; RELATIVE LOCATION; RISETIMES; RUPTURE DIRECTIVITY; RUPTURE MODELS; RUPTURE PROCESS; RUPTURE VELOCITIES; SEISMIC MOMENT; SHALLOW DEPTHS; SHALLOW SOURCES; SHALLOW STRUCTURE; STATIC DISPLACEMENT; WAVE FORMS;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; DYNAMICS; EARTHQUAKES; KINEMATICS; OIL FIELDS; STATISTICAL TESTS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

WATER INJECTION;

CRUSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA SET; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE EPICENTER; EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; FLUID INJECTION; FOCAL MECHANISM; INDUCED SEISMICITY; KINEMATICS; LOVE WAVE; P-WAVE; PARAMETERIZATION; RAYLEIGH WAVE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; EKOFISK FIELD; NORTH SEA;

EID: 80052961763     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05151.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Abdulraheem, A., Zaman, M. & Roegiers, J.-C., 1994. A finite-element model for Ekofisk field subsidence, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 10, 299-310.
2. Cesca, S., Heimann, S., Stammler, K. & Dahm, T., 2010. Automated procedure for point and kinematic source inversion at regional distances, J. geophys. Res., 115, B06304, doi:.
3. Cesca, S., Heimann, S. & Dahm, T., 2011. Rapid directivity detection by azimuthal amplitude spectra inversion, J. Seismol., 15, 147-164, doi:.
4. Chan, A.W.-K., 2004. Production induced reservoir compaction, permeability loss and land surface subsidence, PhD thesis, Stanford University, Appendix 5.
5. Geertsma, J., 1973. A basic theory of subsidence due to reservoir compaction: the homogeneous case, Verhandelingen Kon. Ned. Geol. Mijnbouwk, Gen., 28, 43-62.
6. Heimann, S., 2010. A robust method to estimate kinematic earthquake source parameters, PhD thesis, University of Hamburg.
7. Hu, J.-C. et al., 2007. Coseismic deformation revealed by inversion of strong motion and GPS data: the 2003 Chengkung earthquake in eastern Taiwan, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 667-674.
8. Kaverina, A., Dreger, D. & Pryce, E. 2002. The combined inversion of seismic and geodetic data for the source process of the 16 October 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, earthquake, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 92, 1266-1280.
9. Nagel, N., 2001. Ekofisk geomechanics monitoring, Proc. Int. Workshop on Geomechanics in Reservoir Simulation, Inst. Francais du Petrole, Rueil-Malmaison.
10. Ottemöller, L., Nielsen, H.H., Atakan, K., Braunmiller, J. & Haskov, J., 2005. The 7 May 2001 induced seismic event in the Ekofisk oil field, North Sea, J. geophys. Res., 110, doi:.
11. Seegall, P., 1989. Earthquake triggered by fluid extraction, Geology, 17, 942-946.
12. Selby, N., Eshun, E., Patton, H. & Douglas, A., 2005. Unusual long-period Rayleigh wave from a vertical dip-slip source: the 7 May 2001, North Sea earthquake, J. geophys. Res., 110, doi:.
13. Udías, A., 1999. Principles of Seismology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Wells, D.L. & Coppersmith, K.J., 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement, Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 84, 974-1002.