Identification of GTN model parameters by application of response surface methodology

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages 415-420

  Abbasi, M ^a   Ketabchi, M ^a   Izadkhah, H ^a   Fatmehsaria, D H ^a   Aghbash, A N ^b  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Forming limit diagram; GTN model; Response surface methodology; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ABAQUS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; INVERSE PROBLEMS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ABAQUS SOFTWARE; DUCTILE FAILURES; FORMING LIMIT DIAGRAMS; GTN MODELS; MATERIAL PARAMETER; PLASTIC-DAMAGE MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SIMULATION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 80052924876     PISSN: 18777058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.070     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Ahmadi S, Eivani AR, Akbarzadeh A. An experimental and theoretical study on the prediction of forming limit diagrams using new BBC yield criteria and M-K analysis. Comp Mater Sci 2008; 44: 1272-1280.
2. Aghaie-khafri M, Mahmudi R, Pishbin H. Role of yield criteria and hardening laws in the prediction of forming limit diagrams. Metall Mater Trans A 2002; 33: 1363-1371.
3. Zhiying C, Xianghuai D. The GTN damage model based on Hill'48 anisotropic yield criterion and its application in sheet metal forming. Comp Mater Sci 2009; 44: 1013-1021.
4. Brunet M, Morestin F, Walter H. Damage identification for anisotropic sheet-metals using a non-local damage model. Int J Damage Mech 2004; 13: 35-57.
5. Sprinmnann M, Kuna M. Determination of ductile damage parameters by local deformation fields: measurement and simulation. Arch Appl Mech 2006; 75: 775-797.
6. Brunet M, Mguil S, Morestin F. Analytical and experimental studies of necking in sheet metal forming processes. J Mater Proc Technol 1998; 80-81: 40-46.
7. Fratini L, Lombardo A, Micari F. Material characterization for the prediction of ductile fracture occurrence: an inverse approach. J Mater Proc Technol 1996; 60: 311-316.
8. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
9. Thomason PF. Ductile fracture of metals. London: Pergamon Press; 1990.
10. ASTM Standards. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM E8-E8M; 2009.
11. Abaqus/6.9 Software, Abaqus Analysis User's Manual (6.9), Porous metal plasticity; 2009.
12. Abbasi M. Analysis of wrinkling and tearing of tailor welded blank during deep drawing process, Ph. D. Thesis, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; 2011.
13. Ozturk F, Lee D. Experimental and numerical analysis of out-of-plane formability test. J Mater Proc Technol 2005; 170: 247-253.
14. Hosford WF, Caddell RM. Metal forming-mechanics and metallurgy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.