Mechanical characterization and modeling of interfacial lamella within a flax bundle

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue , 2011, Pages 906-911

  Charlet, Karine ^a   Béakou, Alexis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Composite materials; Flax; Interfaces; Numerical modeling

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERIZATION; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; FLAX; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LINEN; NUMERICAL MODELS; YARN;

COHESIVE ZONE MODEL; EXPERIMENTAL VALUES; FIBER PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATIONS; PROGRESSIVE DAMAGE; SHEARING PROPERTY; STRESS DISPLACEMENT CURVES;

FIBERS;

EID: 80052918444     PISSN: 18777058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.149     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Harris M. In: Harris's Handbook of textile fibers, Harris Research Laboratory, Washington D.C., USA; 1954.
2. Assarar M, Scida D, El Mahi A, Poilâne C, Ayad R. Influence of water ageing on mechanical properties and damage events of two reinforced composite materials: flax-fibres and glass-fibres. Mater Design 2011;32(2):788-95.
3. Batra SK. Other long vegetable fibers. In: Lewin M, Pearce EM, editors. Handbook of fiber Chemistry 1998, p. 505-75.
4. Ganster J, Fink HP. Physical constants of cellulose. In: Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke EA, editors. Polymer handbook, New York: Wiley; 1999.
5. Oksman K. High quality flax fibre composites manufactured by the resin trandfer moulding process. J Reinf Plast Comp 2001;20:621-7.
6. Baley C. Analysis of the flax fibers tensile behaviour and analysis of the tensile stiffness increase. Comp Part A 2002;33:939-48.
7. Andersons J, Porike E, Spärninš E. The effect of mechanical defects on the strength distribution of elementary flax fibres, Comp Sci Tech 2009;69:2152-7.
8. Bos HL. The potential of flax fibres as reinforcement for composite materials. PhD thesis, Eindhoven; 2004.
9. Van de Weyenberg I, Chi Truong T, Vangrimde B, Verpoest I. Improving the properties of UD flax fibre reinforced composites by applying an alkaline fibre treatment. Comp Part A 2006;37:1368-76.
10. Modniks J, Andersons J. Modeling elastic properties of short flax fiber-reinforced composites by orientation averaging, Comp Mater Sci 2010;50:595-9.
11. Le Duigou A, Davies P, Baley C. Macroscopic analysis of interfacial properties of flax/PLLA biocomposites. Comp Sci Tech 2010;70:1612-20.
12. Meijer WJM, Vertregt N, Rutgers B, van de Waart M. The pectin content as a measure of the retting and rettability of flax, Ind Crop Prod 1995;4:273-84.
13. Morvan C, Andème-Onzighi C, Girault R, Himmelsbach DS, Driouich A, Akin DE. Building flax fibres: more than one brick in the walls. Plant Physiol Bioch 2003;41:935-44.
14. Scarponi C, Pizzinelli CS. Interface and mechanical properties of natural fibres reinforced composites: a review, Int J Materials and Product Technology 2009;36:278-303.
15. Stamboulis A, Baillie C, Schulz E. Interfacial characterization of flax fibre-thermoplastic polymer composites by the pull-out test. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 1999:272:117-20.
16. Zafeiropoulos NE, Baillie CA, Matthews FL. Modification and characterization of the interface in flax/polypropylene composite materials. Proceedings of ECCM9. Brighton, GB, June 2000.
17. Baiardo M, Zini E, Scandola M. Flax fibre-polyester composites. Comp Part A 2004;35:703-10.
18. Le Duigou A, Davies P, Baley C. Interfacial bonding of Flax fibre/Poly(l-lactide) bio-composites. Comp Sci Tech 2010;70:231-39.
19. Awal A, Cescutti G, Ghosh SB, Müssig J. Interfacial studies of natural fibre/polypropylene composites using single fibre fragmentation test (SFFT). Comp Part A 2011; 42:50-6.
20. Cantero G, Arbelaiz A, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I. Effects of fibre treatment on wettability and mechanical behaviour of flax/polypropylene composites. Comp Sci Tech 2003;63:1247-54.
21. Marais S, Gouanvé F, Bonnesoeur A, Grenet J, Poncin-Epaillard F, Morvan C, Métayer M. Unsaturated polyester composites reinforced with flax fibers: effect of cold plasma and autoclave treatments on mechanical and permeation properties. Comp Part A 2005;36:975-86.
22. Baley C, Busnel F, Grohens Y, Sire O. Influence of chemical treatments on surface properties and adhesion of flax fibre-polyester resin. Comp Part A 2006;37:1626-37.
23. John MJ, Anandjiwala RD. Chemical modification of flax reinforced polypropylene composites. Comp Part A 2009;40:442-8.
24. Domengès B, Charlet K. Direct Insights on Flax Fiber Structure by Focused Ion Beam Microscopy. Microsc Microanal 2010;16:175-82.
25. Alfano G, de Barros S, Champaney L, Valoroso N. Comparison between two cohesive models for the analysis of interface debonding. In: Neittaanmäki P, Rossi T, Majava K, Pironneau O, eds. ECCOMAS 2004. Jyväskylä, Finland, July 2004.
26. Xu XP, Needlemann A. Numerical simulations of fast growth in brittle solids. JMPS 1994;42:1397-1434.
27. Allix O, Ladevèze P. Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of delamination. Comp Struct 1992;22:235-42.
28. Alfano G, Crisfield MA. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues. Int J Numer Meth Eng 2001;50:1701-36.
29. Endress HU, Döschle-Volle C, Dengler K. Rheological methods to characterize pectins in solutions and gels. In: Visser J, Voragen AGJ, editors. Pectins and pectinases, Progress in Biotechnology, Elsevier; 1995, p. 418.
30. Alonso-Mougán M, Meijide F, Jover A, Rodríguez- Núñez E, Vázquez-Tato J. Rheological behaviour of an amide pectin. J Food Eng 2002;55:123-9.
31. Stamboulis A, Baillie CA, Garkhail SK, Van Melick HGH, Peijs T. Environmental durability on flax fibers and their composites based on polypropylene matrix. Appl Comp Mater 2000;7:273-94.
32. Romhany G, Karger-Kocsis J, Czigany T. Tensile fracture and failure behavior of technical flax fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 2003;90:3638-45.