|
Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 424-436
|
Comparison of image enhancement methods for the effective diagnosis in successive whole-body bone scans
|
Author keywords
Exact histogram matching; Image enhancement; Similarity measure; Successive whole body bone scans
|
Indexed keywords
ADAPTIVE HISTOGRAM EQUALIZATION;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE;
HISTOGRAM EQUALIZATIONS;
HISTOGRAM INTERSECTION;
HISTOGRAM MATCHING;
INTENSITY INFORMATION;
PEAK SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;
SIMILARITY MEASURE;
STRUCTURAL SIMILARITY;
TUMOR RESPONSE;
WHOLE-BODY BONE;
BONE;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
DIAGNOSIS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
NUCLEAR MEDICINE;
SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;
STATISTICAL METHODS;
TUMORS;
GRAPHIC METHODS;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
MEDRONATE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;
ALGORITHM;
ARTICLE;
BONE;
BONE TUMOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
HUMAN;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
METHODOLOGY;
REPRODUCIBILITY;
SCINTISCANNING;
WHOLE BODY IMAGING;
ALGORITHMS;
BONE AND BONES;
BONE NEOPLASMS;
HUMANS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
TECHNETIUM TC 99M MEDRONATE;
WHOLE BODY IMAGING;
|
EID: 80052914663
PISSN: 08971889
EISSN: 1618727X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9273-x Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (13)
|