Determination of nonlinear fibre-reinforced biphasic poroviscoelastic constitutive parameters of articular cartilage using stress relaxation indentation testing and an optimizing finite element analysis

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Volumn 107, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 315-326

  Seifzadeh, A ^a   Oguamanam, D C D ^a   Trutiak, N ^b   Hurtig, M ^b,c   Papini, M ^a,c  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^c CANADIAN INSTITUTES OF HEALTH RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Finite element; Friction; Human; Nonlinear biphasic poroviscoelastic fibre reinforced; Optimization; Stress relaxation indentation

Indexed keywords

ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; CONSTITUTIVE PARAMETERS; FINITE ELEMENT; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; FRICTIONAL CONTACT; FRICTIONLESS CONTACTS; GLOBAL MINIMA; HUMAN; HUMAN ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; INDENTATION LOAD; INDENTATION TEST; INDENTATION TESTING; INDENTER SIZE; INDENTERS; INITIAL GUESS; INVERSE METHODS; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATERIAL PROPERTY; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZED PARAMETER; POISSON'S RATIO; POROVISCOELASTIC;

ALGORITHMS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FRICTION; INVERSE PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION; POISSON RATIO; REINFORCEMENT; SIMULATED ANNEALING; STRESS RELAXATION; TRIBOLOGY;

CARTILAGE;

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HUMAN; MALE; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR FIBRE REINFORCED BIPHASIC POROVISCOELASTIC CONSTITUTIVE PARAMETER; PERMEABILITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIMULATED ANNEALING OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM; STRESS; VALIDITY; VISCOELASTICITY;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FRICTION; HARDNESS; HARDNESS TESTS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PHASE TRANSITION; POROSITY; VISCOSITY;

EID: 80052909180     PISSN: 01692607     EISSN: 18727565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Lipshitz H., Etheredge R., Glimcher M. In vitro wear of articular cartilage. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1975, 57:527-534.
2. Maroudas A., Bullough P. Permeability of articular cartilage. Nature 1968, 219:1260-1261.
3. Mow V.C., Holmes M.H., Lai W.M. Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 1984, 17:377-394.
4. Cremer M.A., Rosloniec E.F., Kang A.H. The cartilage collagens: a review of their structure, organization, and role in the pathogenesis of experimental arthritis in animals and in human rheumatic disease. J. Mol. Med. 1998, 76:275-288.
5. Hasler E.M., Herzog W., Wu J.Z., Muller W., Wyss U. Articular cartilage biomechanics: theoretical models, material properties, and biosynthesis response. Clin. Rev. Biomech. Eng. 1999, 27:415-488.
6. Clark J.M. Variation of collagen fiber alignment in a joint surface:a scanning electron microscope study of the tibial plateau in dog, rabbit, and man. J. Orthop. Res. 1991, 9:246-257.
7. Clark J.M. The organization of collagen fibrils in the superficial zones of articular cartilage. J. Anat. 1990, 171:117-130.
8. Mow V.C., Kuei S.C., Lai W.M., Armstrong C.G. Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 1980, 102:73-84.
9. Mak A.F. Unconfined compression of hydrated viscoelastic tissues: a biphasic poroviscoelastic analysis. Biorheology 1986, 23:371-383.
10. Athanasiou K.A., Zhu C.F., Wang X. Effects of aging and dietary restriction on the structural integrity of rat articular cartilage. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 28(2):143-149.
11. Cao L., Youn Inchan I., Guilak F., Setton Lori A. Compressive properties of mouse articular cartilage determined in a novel micro-indentation test method and biphasic finite element model. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2006, 128(5):766-772.
12. Olberding J.E., Suh J.-K.F. A dual optimization method for the material parameter identification of a biphasic poroviscoelastic hydrogel: potential application to hypercompliant soft tissues. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2468-2475.
13. Storn R., Price K. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heurixtic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 1997, 11:341-359.
14. Wilson W., van Donkelaar C.C., van Rietbergen B., Huiskes R. A fibril-reinforced poroviscoelastic swelling model for articular cartilage. J. Biomech. 2004, 38(6):1195-1204.
15. Garcia J.J., Cortes D.H. A biphasic viscohyperelastic fibril-reinforced model for articular cartilage: Formulation and comparison with experimental data. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:1737-1744.
16. DiSilvestro M.R., Zhu Q., Suh J.K. Biphasic poroviscoelastic simulation of the unconfined compression of articular cartilage. II. Effect of variable strain rates. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2001, 123(2):198-200.
17. Fulin L., Szeri A.Z. Inverse analysis of constitutive models: biological soft tissues. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:936-940.
18. Li L.P., Herzog W. Arthroscopic evaluation of cartilage degeneration using indentation testing-influence of indenter geometry. Clin. Biomech. 2006, 21(4):420-426.
19. Zhang M., Zheng Y.P., Mak A.F.T. Estimating the effective Young's modulus of soft tissues from indentation tests - nonlinear finite element analysis of effects of friction and large deformation. Med. Eng. Phys. 1997, 19:512-517.
20. Wu J.Z., Dong R.G., Schopper A.W. Analysis of effects of friction on the deformation behaviour soft tissues in unconfined compression tests. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:147-155.
21. Spilker R.L., Suh J.K., Mow V.C. Effects of friction on the unconfined compressive response of articular cartilage: a finite element analysis. J. Biomech. Eng. 1990, 112(2):138-146.
22. Wu J.Z., Dong R.G., Smutz W.P. Elimination of the friction effects in unconfined compression tests of biomaterials and soft tissues. J. Eng. Med. H 2004, 218:000.
23. DiSilvestro M.R., Suh J.K.F. A cross-validation of the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, indentation, and confined compression. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:519-525.
24. Mak A.F. The apparent viscoelastic behaviour of articular cartilage - the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelastcity and interstitial fluid flows. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 1986, 108:123-130.
25. Suh J.-K.F., Bai S. Finite element formulation of biphasic poroviscoelastic model for articular cartilage. J. Biomech. Eng. 1998, 120:195-201.
26. ABAQUS manual, 2006, ver. 6.3, Hibbit, Karlson and Sorenson.
27. Suh J.K.F., DiSilvestro M.R. Biphasic poroviscoelastic behavior of hydrated biological soft tissue. J. Appl. Mech. 1999, 66:528-535.
28. Lai W.M., Mow V.C. Drag induced compression of articular cartilage during a permeation experiment. Biorheology 1980, 17:111-123.
29. Wu J.Z., Herzog W., Epstein M. Evaluation of the finite element software ABAQUS for biomechanical modelling of biphasic tissues. J. Biomech. 1997, 31(2):165-169.
30. Li L.P., Buschmann M.D., Shirazi-Adl A. A fibril reinforced nonhomogeneous poroelastic model for articular cartilage: inhomogeneous response in unconfined compression. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:1533-1541.
31. Li L.P., Solhat J., Buschman M.D., Shirazi-Adl A. Nonlinear analysis of cartilage in unconfined ramp compression using a fibril reinforced poroelastic model. Clin. Biomech. 1999, 14:673-682.
32. Kirkpatrick S. Optimization by simulated annealing. J. Stat. Phys. 1984, 34(5-6):975-986.
33. Duffull S.B., Retout S., Mentre F. The use of simulated annealing for finding optimal population designs. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 2002, 69:25-35.
34. L. Drack, Multidisciplinary Design System for General Aviation Aircraft Propellers, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Aerospace Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, 2000.
35. Arora J.S. Introduction to Optimum Design 1989, McGraw Hill.
36. H.S. Zadeh, Constraint multi-objective optimisation of a controller for a highly nonlinear aero elastic structure-methodology, In: 12th International Conference on Analytical and Stochastic Modelling Techniques and Applications in conjunction with the 19th European Simulation Multi conference, Riga, Latvia, 2005.
37. Northwood E., Fisher J., Kowalski R. Investigation of the friction and surface degradation of innovative chondroplasty materials against articular cartilage. Med. Eng. H: J. Eng. Proc. Inst. Mech. 2007, 221-263.
38. Pickard J., Ingham E., Egan J., Fisher J. Investigation into the effect of proteoglycan molecules on the tribological properties of cartilage joint tissues. Med. Eng. H: J. Eng. Proc. Inst. Mech. 1998, 177-212.
39. Pickard J.E., Fisher J., Ingham E., Egan J. Investigation into the effects of proteins and lipids on the frictional properties of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 1998, 19(19):1807-1812.
40. Forster H., Fisher J. The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent surface wear on the friction of articular cartilage. Med. Eng. H: J. Eng. Proc. Inst. Mech. 1999, 213-329.
41. Takahashi Y., Yamamoto K., Chueh S., Tamada Y., Tomita N. Effects of relative sliding stimulus on the friction properties of regenerated cartilage. Eur. Cells Mater. 2006, 12(Suppl. 1):16.
42. Athanasiou K.A., Rosenwasser M.P., Buckwalter J.A. Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 1991, 9:330-340.
43. Huang C.U., Soltz M.A., Kopacz M., Mow V.C., Ateshian G.A. Experimental verification of the roles of intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and tension-compression nonlinearity in the biphasic resonse of cartilage. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2003, 125(1):84-93.