Compare display schemes for lung nodule CT screening

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 478-484

  Wang, Xiao Hui ^a   Durick, Janet E ^b   Lu, Amy ^b   Herbert, David L ^b   Fuhrman, Carl R ^b   Lacomis, Joan M ^b   Britton, Cynthia A ^b   Strollo, Diane C ^b   Shang, Sherry S ^c   Golla, Saraswathi K ^b   Good, Walter F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Image display; Image interpretation; Lung neoplasm; Volume visualization

Indexed keywords

3D DATA; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CT DATA; CT SLICES; DATA SETS; DETECTION PERFORMANCE; DISPLAY MODES; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE INTERPRETATION; LUNG CANCER SCREENING; LUNG NEOPLASM; LUNG NODULE; LUNG NODULE DETECTION; MAXIMUM INTENSITY PROJECTION; MEDICAL IMAGES; MONOSCOPIC; NODULE DETECTION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; SLAB THICKNESS; STEREO DISPLAYS; STEREOSCOPIC DISPLAY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D); VOLUME VISUALIZATION;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DISPLAY DEVICES; MEDICAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY; VISUALIZATION;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG; LUNG TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80052896553     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9293-6     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Data & Statistics. Available at: External link http://www.lungusa. org/site/c.dvLUK9O0E/b.33347/AccessedApril 7, 2009.
2. SEER Stat Fact Sheets. Available at: External link http://seer.cancer. gov/statfacts/html/lungb.html Accessed April 7, 2009.
3. Kabat GC: Recent developments in the epidemiology of lung cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 9:73-79, 1993.
4. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, et al: Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 83:584-594, 2008.
5. Beigelman-Aubry C: Post-processing and display in multislice CT of the chest. JBR-BTR 90:85-88, 2007.
6. Vick 3rd, GW: Three- and four-dimensional visualization of magnetic resonance imaging data sets in pediatric cardiology. Pediatr Cardiol 21:27-36, 2000.
7. Uttecht S, Thulborn KR: Software for efficient visualization and analysis of multiple, large, multi-dimensional data sets from magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 26:73-89, 2002.
8. Goodsitt MM, Chan HP, Darner KL, et al: The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography. Med Phys 29:2725-2734, 2002.
9. Chan HP, Goodsitt MM, Helvie MA, et al: ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions. Med Phys 32:1001-1009, 2005.
10. Wang XH, Good WF, Fuhrman CR, et al: Stereo CT image compositing methods for lung nodule detection and characterization. Acad Radiol 12:1512-1520, 2005.
11. Wang XH, Durick JE, Lu A, et al: Characterization of radiologists' search strategies for lung nodule detection: slicebased versus volumetric displays. J Digital Imaging 21(Supplement 1):39-49, 2008.
12. Stereo 101-Stereoscopic Display Technology. Available at: External link http://www.planar3d.com/3d-technology/stereoscopic-101/Accessed March 31, 2010.