Mechanism of PhosphoThreonine/Serine Recognition and Specificity for Modular Domains from All-atom Molecular Dynamics

BMC Biophysics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Huang, Yu ming M ^a   Chang, Chia en A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052892850     PISSN: 20461682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2046-1682-4-12     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Westheimer FH. WHY NATURE CHOSE PHOSPHATES. Science 1987, 235(4793):1173-1178. 10.1126/science.2434996, 2434996.
2. Yaffe MB, Cantley LC. Signal transduction - Grabbing phosphoproteins. Nature 1999, 402(6757):30-31. 10.1038/46925, 10573413.
3. Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ. Phosphoserine/threonine binding domains: You can't pSERious?. Structure 2001, 9(3):R33-R38. 10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00580-9, 11286893.
4. Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ. The use of in vitro peptide-library screens in the analysis of phosphoserine/threonine-binding domain structure and function. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 2004, 33:225-244. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.33.110502.133346, 15139812.
5. Seet BT, Dikic I, Zhou MM, Pawson T. Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. 2006, 7.
6. Jorgensen C, Linding R. Directional and quantitative phosphorylation networks. Briefings in Functional Genomics & Proteomics 2008, 7(1):17-26. 10.1093/bfgp/eln001, 21596801.
7. Narayanan A, Jacobson MP. Computational studies of protein regulation by post-translational phosphorylation. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2009, 19(2):156-163. 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.02.007, 19339172.
8. Virshup DM, Shenolikar S. From Promiscuity to Precision: Protein Phosphatases Get a Makeover. Molecular Cell 2009, 33(5):537-545. 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.015, 19285938.
9. Diella F, Haslam N, Chica C, Budd A, Michael S, Brown NP, Trave G, Gibson TJ. Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Frontiers in Bioscience 2008, 13:6580-6603.
10. Liao H, Byeon IJL, Tsai MD. Structure and function of a new phosphopeptide-binding domain containing the FHA2 of Rad53. 1999, 294.
11. Liao H, Yuan CH, Su MI, Yongkiettrakul S, Qin DY, Li HY, Byeon IJL, Pei DH, Tsai MD. Structure of the FHA1 domain of yeast Rad53 and identification of binding sites for both FHA1 and its target protein Rad9. Journal of Molecular Biology 2000, 304(5):941-951. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4291, 11124038.
12. Durocher D, Taylor IA, Sarbassova D, Haire LF, Westcott SL, Jackson SP, Smerdon SJ, Yaffe MB. The molecular basis of FHA Domain: Phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. 2000, 6.
13. Liang XY, Van Doren SR. Mechanistic insights into phosphoprotein-binding FHA domains. 2008, 41.
14. Mahajan A, Yuan CH, Lee H, Chen ESW, Wu PY, Tsai MD. Structure and Function of the Phosphothreonine-Specific FHA Domain. Science Signaling 2009, 2(58).
15. Pennell S, Westcott S, Ortiz-Lombardia M, Patel D, Li JJ, Nott TJ, Mohammed D, Buxton RS, Yaffe MB, Verma C, Smerdon SJ. Structural and Functional Analysis of Phosphothreonine-Dependent FHA Domain Interactions. Structure 2010, 18(12):1587-1595. 10.1016/j.str.2010.09.014, 21134638.
16. Yuan CH, Yongkiettrakul S, Byeon IJL, Zhou SZ, Tsai MD. Solution structures of two FHA1-phosphothreonine peptide complexes provide insight into the structural basis of the ligand specificity of FHA1 from yeast Rad53. 2001, 314.
17. Lee SJ, Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Stern DF. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Molecular and Cellular Biology 2003, 23(17):6300-6314. 10.1128/MCB.23.17.6300-6314.2003, 180918, 12917350.
18. Byeon IJL, Li HY, Song HY, Gronenborn AM, Tsai MD. Sequential phosphorylation and multisite interactions characterize specific target recognition by the FHA domain of Ki67. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2005, 12(11):987-993.
19. Hofmann K, Bucher P. The Fha Domain - a Putative Nuclear Signaling Domain Found in Protein-Kinases and Transcription Factors. 1995, 20.
20. Byeon IJL, Yongkiettrakul S, Tsai MD. Solution structure of the yeast Rad53 FHA2 complexed with a phosphothreonine peptide pTXXL: Comparison with the structures of FHA2-pYXL and FHA1-pTXXD complexes. 2001, 314.
21. Lee GI, Ding ZF, Walker JC, Van Doren SR. NMR structure of the forkhead-associated domain from the Arabidopsis receptor kinase-associated protein phosphatase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100(20):11261-11266. 10.1073/pnas.2031918100, 208745, 14500786.
22. Ali AAE, Jukes RM, Pearl LH, Oliver AW. Specific recognition of a multiply phosphorylated motif in the DNA repair scaffold XRCC1 by the FHA domain of human PNK. 2009, 37.
23. Nott TJ, Kelly G, Stach L, Li JJ, Westcott S, Patel D, Hunt DM, Howell S, Buxton RS, O'Hare HM, Smerdon SJ. An Intramolecular Switch Regulates Phosphoindependent FHA Domain Interactions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science Signaling 2009, 2(63).
24. Callebaut I, Mornon JP. From BRCA1 to RAP1: A widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair. 1997, 400.
25. Glover JNM, Williams RS, Lee MS. Interactions between BRCT repeats and phosphoproteins: tangled up in two. 2004, 29.
26. Gough CA, Gojobori T, Imanishi T. Cancer-related mutations in BRCA1-BRCT cause long-range structural changes in protein-protein binding sites: A molecular dynamics study. 2007, 66.
27. Watts FZ, Brissett NC. Linking up and interacting with BRCT domains. 2010, 9.
28. Manke IA, Lowery DM, Nguyen A, Yaffe MB. BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting. Science 2003, 302(5645):636-639. 10.1126/science.1088877, 14576432.
29. Williams RS, Lee MS, Hau DD, Glover JNM. Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2004, 11(6):519-525. 10.1038/nsmb776, 21623378.
30. Clapperton JA, Manke IA, Lowery DM, Ho T, Haire LF, Yaffe MB, Smerdon SJ. Structure and mechanism of BRCA1 BRCT domain recognition of phosphorylated BACH1 with implications for cancer. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2004, 11(6):512-518. 10.1038/nsmb775, 21623378.
31. Shiozaki EN, Gu LC, Yan N, Shi YG. Structure of the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 bound to a BACH1 phosphopeptide: Implications for signaling. Molecular Cell 2004, 14(3):405-412. 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00238-2, 15125843.
32. Lu PJ, Zhou XZ, Liou YC, Noel JP, Lu KP. Critical role of WW domain phosphorylation in regulating phosphoserine binding activity and Pin1 function. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2002, 277(4):2381-2384. 10.1074/jbc.C100228200, 11723108.
33. Otte L, Wiedemann U, Schlegel B, Pires JR, Beyermann M, Schmieder P, Krause G, Volkmer-Engert R, Schneider-Mergener J, Oschkinat H. WW domain sequence activity relationships identified using ligand recognition propensities of 42 WW domains. Protein Science 2003, 12(3):491-500. 10.1110/ps.0233203, 2312455, 12592019.
34. Verdecia MA, Bowman ME, Lu KP, Hunter T, Noel JP. Structural basis for phosphoserine-proline recognition by group IVWW domains. Nature Structural Biology 2000, 7(8):639-643. 10.1038/77929, 10932246.
35. Lee H, Yuan CH, Hammet A, Mahajan A, Chen ESW, Wu MR, Su MI, Heierhorst J, Tsai MD. Diphosphothreonine-specific interaction between an SQ/TQ cluster and an FHA domain in the Rad53-Dun1 kinase cascade. 2008, 30.
36. Okur A, Strockbine B, Hornak V, Simmerling C. Using PC clusters to evaluate the transferability of molecular mechanics force fields for proteins. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2003, 24(1):21-31. 10.1002/jcc.10184, 12483672.
37. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 2006, 65(3):712-725.
38. Phillips JC, Braun R, Wang W, Gumbart J, Tajkhorshid E, Villa E, Chipot C, Skeel RD, Kale L, Schulten K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2005, 26(16):1781-1802. 10.1002/jcc.20289, 2486339, 16222654.
39. Homeyer N, Horn AHC, Lanig H, Sticht H. AMBER force-field parameters for phosphorylated amino acids in different protonation states: phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine, and phosphohistidine. Journal of Molecular Modeling 2006, 12(3):281-289. 10.1007/s00894-005-0028-4, 16240095.
40. Song YF, Gunner MR. Using Multiconformation Continuum Electrostatics to Compare Chloride Binding Motifs in alpha-Amylase, Human Serum Albumin, and Omp32. Journal of Molecular Biology 2009, 387(4):840-856. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.038, 19340943.
41. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. COMPARISON OF SIMPLE POTENTIAL FUNCTIONS FOR SIMULATING LIQUID WATER. Journal of Chemical Physics 1983, 79(2):926-935.
42. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A SMOOTH PARTICLE MESH EWALD METHOD. Journal of Chemical Physics 1995, 103(19):8577-8593.
43. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. NUMERICAL-INTEGRATION OF CARTESIAN EQUATIONS OF MOTION OF A SYSTEM WITH CONSTRAINTS - MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS OF N-ALKANES. Journal of Computational Physics 1977, 23(3):327-341.
44. Sitkoff D, Sharp KA, Honig B. ACCURATE CALCULATION OF HYDRATION FREE-ENERGIES USING MACROSCOPIC SOLVENT MODELS. Journal of Physical Chemistry 1994, 98(7):1978-1988.
45. Tsui V, Case DA. Theory and applications of the generalized Born solvation model in macromolecular Simulations. Biopolymers 2000, 56(4):275-291. 10.1002/1097-0282(2000)56:4<275::AID-BIP10024>3.0.CO;2-E, 11754341.
46. Bashford D, Case DA. Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 2000, 51:129-152. 10.1146/annurev.physchem.51.1.129, 11031278.
47. Meirovitch H. Recent developments in methodologies for calculating the entropy and free energy of biological systems by computer simulation. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2007, 17(2):181-186. 10.1016/j.sbi.2007.03.016, 17395451.
48. Chang CEA, McLaughlin WA, Baron R, Wang W, McCammon JA. Entropic contributions and the influence of the hydrophobic environment in promiscuous protein-protein association. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(21):7456-7461. 10.1073/pnas.0800452105, 2391134, 18495919.
49. Wang J, Cai Q, Li ZL, Zhao HK, Luo R. Achieving energy conservation in Poisson-Boltzmann molecular dynamics: Accuracy and precision with finite-difference algorithms. Chemical Physics Letters 2009, 468(4-6):112-118. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.12.049, 2663913, 20098487.
50. Ye X, Wang J, Luo R. A Revised Density Function for Molecular Surface Calculation in Continuum Solvent Models. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 2010, 6(4):1157-1169.
51. Tan C, Tan YH, Luo R. Implicit nonpolar solvent models. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 2007, 111:12263-12274.
52. Hnizdo V, Tan J, Killian BJ, Gilson MK. Efficient calculation of configurational entropy from molecular simulations by combining the mutual-information expansion and nearest-neighbor methods. Journal of Computational Chemistry 2008, 29(10):1605-1614. 10.1002/jcc.20919, 2620139, 18293293.
53. Ai R, Fatmi MQ, Chang C. T-Analyst: a program for efficient analysis of protein conformational changes by torsion angles. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 2010, 24(10):819-827. 10.1007/s10822-010-9376-y, 2940022, 20689979.
54. Joshi M, Ebalunode JO, Briggs JM. Computational insights into the interaction of the anthrax lethal factor with the N-terminal region of its substrates. Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 2009, 75(2):323-335.
55. Hou T, Wang J, Li Y, Wang W. Assessing the Performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA Methods. 1. The Accuracy of Binding Free Energy Calculations Based on Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011, 51:14.
56. Mandell DJ, Chorny I, Groban ES, Wong SE, Levine E, Rapp CS, Jacobson MP. Strengths of hydrogen bonds involving phosphorylated amino acid side chains. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2007, 129:820-827. 10.1021/ja063019w, 17243818.
57. Khanna KK, Jackson SP. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. 2001, 27.
58. Traven A, Heierhorst J. SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins. Bioessays 2005, 27(4):397-407. 10.1002/bies.20204, 15770685.