Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: Comparative study of higher order aberrations

Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 314-320

  El Awady, Hatem E ^a   Ghanem, Asaad A ^a   Saleh, Sameh M ^a  

^a MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABLATION THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUPIL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOPOGRAPHY GUIDED ABLATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; WAVEFRONT OPTIMIZED ABLATION;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; CORNEAL WAVEFRONT ABERRATION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; LASERS, EXCIMER; MALE; MYOPIA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; SURGICAL FLAPS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052885270     PISSN: 15428877     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/15428877-20110421-01     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ang RE, Chan WK, Wee TL, Lee HM, Bunnapradist P, Cox I. Efficacy of an aspheric treatment algorithm in decreasing induced spherical aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35;1348-1357.
2. Marcos S, Cano D, Barbero S. Increase in corneal asphericity after standard laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia is not inherent to the Munnerlyn algorithm. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S592-S596. (Pubitemid 37185909)
3. Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M, Kreuger RR. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:447-453. (Pubitemid 38293097)
4. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46-52. (Pubitemid 18036692)
5. Roberts C. The cornea is not a piece of plastic. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:407-413. (Pubitemid 30637475)
6. Mrochen M, Donitzky C, Wullner C, Loffler J. Wavefront-optimized ablation profiles: theoretical background. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:775-785. (Pubitemid 38501470)
7. Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Zuppardi E, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy with aspheric profile of ablation versus conventional photorefractive keratectomy for myopia correction: six-month controlled clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:109-116. (Pubitemid 43330058)
8. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J Refract Surg. 2000;16:116-121. (Pubitemid 30202019)
9. Padmanabhan P, Morchen M, Basuthker S, Viswanathan D, Joseph R. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:389-397. (Pubitemid 351635714)
10. Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA, Howland HC, El Danasoury MA. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127:1-7. (Pubitemid 29036609)
11. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:201-207. (Pubitemid 32179496)
12. Moreno-Barriuso E, Lloves JM, Marcos S, Navarro R, Llorente L, Barbero S. Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1396-1403. (Pubitemid 32381987)
13. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong JW, Lee JS, Choi R, Mohan RR. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy: elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:889-896. (Pubitemid 32530319)
14. Seitz B, Torres F, Langenbucher A, Behrens A, Suarez E. Posterior corneal curvature changes after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 2001;108;666-672. (Pubitemid 32238459)
15. Koller T, Iseli HP, Hafezi F, et al. Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:584-589. (Pubitemid 43673875)
16. Vongthongsri A, Phusitphoykai N, Naripthapan P. Comparison of wavefront-guided customized ablation vs. conventional ablation in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:S332-S335.
17. Phusitphoykai N, Tungsiripat T, Siriboonkoom J, Vongthongsri A. Comparison of conventional versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in the same patient. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S217-S220.
18. Kohnen T, Buhren J, Kuhne C, Mirshahi A. Wave front-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1 year follow-up: clinical outcome and change in higher order aberrations. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:2175-2185. (Pubitemid 39575586)
19. Caster Al, Hoff JL, Ruiz R. Conventional vs wavefront-guided LASIK using the LADAR Vision 4000 excimer laser. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S786-S791. (Pubitemid 41705640)
20. Du CX, Shen Y, Wang Y. Comparison of higher order aberrations after conventional and customized ablation in myopic LASIK in different eyes of the same patient. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8:177-180.
21. Kim TI, Yang SJ, Tchah H. Bilateral comparison of wavefront-guided versus conventional laser in situ keratomileusis with Bausch and Lomb Zyoptix. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:432-438. (Pubitemid 39299536)