Umbilical deployment modeling for tethered UAV detecting oil pollution from ship

Applied Ocean Research

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 332-343

  Muttin, Frédéric ^a  

^a EIGSI La Rochelle   (France)

Author keywords

Internal strain energy; Oil spill detection; Unmanned aerial vehicle; Updated Lagrangian method; Variable length cable

Indexed keywords

AERIAL DETECTION; CONTINUOUS MODELS; CURVILINEAR COORDINATE; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; FLIGHT PHASE; FLIGHT PHASIS; INTERNAL STRAINS; LAGRANGIAN; LAGRANGIAN APPROACHES; MATERIAL POINT VELOCITY; NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS; NONLINEAR STRAIN; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; OIL POLLUTION; OIL RECOVERIES; OIL-SLICK DETECTION; UPDATED LAGRANGIAN METHOD; VARIABLE LENGTH;

ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; POLLUTION DETECTION; SHIPS; STRAIN ENERGY; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV); UNMANNED VEHICLES;

LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; COORDINATE; DETECTION METHOD; DISCRETE ELEMENT METHOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LAGRANGIAN ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OIL SPILL; UNMANNED VEHICLE;

EID: 80052880625     PISSN: 01411187     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2011.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Centre de Documentation de Recherche et d'Expérimentations sur les Pollutions Accidentelles des Eaux (CEDRE), L'Observation Aérienne des Pollutions Pétrolières en Mer, Operational Guide; July 2004.
2. Robbe N., Hengstermann T. Remote sensing of marine oil spills from airborne platforms using multi-sensor systems. Proceedings of water pollution VIII 2006, 347-355. WIT Press. C.A. Brebbia, J.S. Antunes do Carmo (Eds.).
3. Fingas M.F., Brown C.E. Review of oil spill remote sensing. Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 1997, 4(4):199-208.
4. Bonn Agreement. Bonn Agreement Aerial Surveillance Handbook. ; 2004. http://www.bonnagreement.org.
5. Poddubnyi V.N., Shamarin YuE., Kholopova V.V. Study of the nonlinear dynamics of self-propelled submersibles with allowance for the effect of the cable. International Applied Mechanics (Translation of Prikl Mekh) 1997, 33(1):72-77.
6. Stanney K.A., Rahn C.D. Response of a tethered aerostat to simulated turbulence. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 2006, 11(6):759-776.
7. Kang W., Lee I. Analysis of tethered aerostat response under atmospheric turbulence considering nonlinear cable dynamics. Journal of Aircraft 2009, 46(1):343-348.
8. Khantsis S., Bourmistrova A. UAV controller design using evolutionary algorithms. Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2005, 3809/2005:1025-1030.
9. Prabhakar S., Buckham B. Dynamics modeling and control of a variable length remotely operated vehicle tether, OCEANS 2005. Proceedings of MTS/IEEE 2005, 2:1255-1262.
10. Buckham B., Driscoll F.R., Nahon M. Development of a finite element cable model for use in low-tension dynamics simulation. Journal of Applied Mechanics 2004, 71(4):476-485.
11. Banerjee A.K., Do V.N. Deployment control of a cable connecting a ship to an underwater vehicle. Applied Mathematics and Computation 1995, 70(2-3):97-116.
12. Rustad A.M., Larsen C.M., Sorensen A.J. FEM modelling and automatic control for collision prevention of top tensioned risers. Marine Structures 2008, 21:80-112.
13. Muttin F., Coupez T., Bellet M., Chenot J.L. Lagrangian finite element analysis of time-dependent viscous free-surface flow using an automatic remeshing technique. Application to metal casting flow. International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering 1993, 36:2001-2015.
14. Germain P. Mécanique des Milieux Continus, Ellipses 1986, Ecole Polytechnique.
15. Haug E., Powell G.H. Analytical shape finding for cable nets. Proceedings of LASS Pacific symposium, part II on tension structures and space frames, Architectural Institute of Japan 1972, 83-92.
16. Lerbet J. About the automatic generation of equations of curvilinear systems. Nonlinear Dynamics 2007, 52(1-2):151-158.
17. Chatanin W., Loutsiouk A., Chucheepsakul S. Applications of Lie group analysis to the equations of motion of inclined unsagged cables. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2008, 2(46):2259-2269.
18. Focke-Achgelis Fa 330A-1. Bachstelze (bergeronnette). Washington, USA: National Air and Space Museum. http://www.nasm.edu/research/aero/aircraft/focke_achgelis.htm.
19. Pflimlin J.M., Hamel T., Souères P. Nonlinear attitude and gyroscope's bias estimation for a VTOL UAV. International Journal of Systems Science 2007, 38(3):197-210.
20. Kamman J.W., Huston R.L. Multibody dynamics modeling of variable length cable systems. Multibody System Dynamics 2001, 5(3):211-221.
21. Aubree M, Belorgey M. Experimental analysis of the wake and local stresses made by uniform fluid flow on a cylindric curved structure with a great bend. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Le Havre; 1993.
22. Garratt J.R. Review of drag coefficients over oceans and continents. Monthly Weather Review 1977, 105(7):915-929.
23. Maat N., Makin V.K. Numerical simulation of air flow over breaking waves. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1992, 60(1-2):77-93.
24. Destuynder P., Fabre C. A Modeling of springing, whipping and slamming for ships. Communications on Pure and Applied Analysis 2009, 8(1):209-235.
25. Katz C, Gauthier R. Oil Spill Response Technology Initiation Decision Report to the Pollution Abatement Ashore Program. Report US Navy and SSC San Diego; December 2007.