Learning structured prediction models for interactive image labeling

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 833-840

  Mensink, Thomas ^a,b   Verbeek, Jakob ^b   Csurka, Gabriela ^a  

^a XEROX RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPE   (France)

^b INRIA Rhne Alpes   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FORECASTING; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ACCURATE PREDICTION; CLASS PREDICTION; CLASS PROBABILITIES; INDEPENDENT MODEL; INTERACTIVE IMAGES; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; STRUCTURED MODEL; STRUCTURED PREDICTION;

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 80052877810     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995380     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. C. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Spinger-Verlag, 2006.
2. J. Bradley and C. Guestrin. Learning tree conditional random fields. In ICML, 2010.
3. S. Branson, C. Wah, F. Schroff, B. Babenko, P. Welinder, P. Perona, and S. Belongie. Visual recognition with humans in the loop. In ECCV, 2010.
4. M. Choi, J. Lim, A. Torralba, and A. Willsky. Exploiting hierarchical context on a large database of object categories. In CVPR, 2010.
5. C. Chow and C. Liu. Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 14(3):462-467, 1968.
6. J. Deng, A. Berg, K. Li, and F.-F. Li. What does classifying more than 10, 000 image categories tell us? In ECCV, 2010.
7. C. Desai, D. Ramanan, and C. Fowlkes. Discriminative models for multi-class object layout. In ICCV, 2009.
8. D. Grangier and S. Bengio. A discriminative kernel-based model to rank images from text queries. PAMI, 30(8):1371-1384, 2008.
9. M. Guillaumin, T. Mensink, J. Verbeek, and C. Schmid. Tagprop: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. In ICCV, 2009.
10. M. Huiskes and M. Lew. The MIR Flickr retrieval evaluation. In ACM MIR, 2008.
11. C. Lampert, H. Nickisch, and S. Harmeling. Learning to detect unseen object classes by between-class attribute transfer. In CVPR, 2009.
12. S. Nowak and M. Huiskes. New strategies for image annotation: Overview of the photo annotation task at ImageCLEF 2010. In Working Notes of CLEF, 2010.
13. F. Perronnin, J. Sánchez, and T. Mensink. Improving the Fisher kernel for large-scale image classification. In ECCV, 2010.
14. J. Platt. Probabilities for SV machines. In Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, 2000.
15. A. Rabinovich, A. Vedaldi, C. Galleguillos, E. Wiewiora, and S. Belongie. Objects in context. In ICCV, 2007.
16. B. Settles. Active learning literature survey. Technical Report 1648, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2009.
17. I. Tsochantaridis, T. Joachims, T. Hofmann, and Y. Altun. Large margin methods for structured and interdependent output variables. JMLR, 6:1453-1484, 2005.
18. S. Vijayanarasimhan and K. Grauman. Multi-level active prediction of useful image annotations for recognition. In NIPS, 2009.
19. J. Weston, S. Bengio, and N. Usunier. Large scale image annotation: Learning to rank with joint word-image embeddings. In ECML, 2010.
20. J. Zhang, M. Marszalek, S. Lazebnik, and C. Schmid. Local features and kernels for classification of texture and object categories: A comprehensive study. IJCV, 73(2):213-238, 2007.