Mutual information-based template matching scheme for detection of breast masses: From mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis

Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 815-823

  Mazurowski, Maciej A ^a   Lo, Joseph Y ^a   Harrawood, Brian P ^a   Tourassi, Georgia D ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital breast tomosynthesis; Image informatics; Mammography; Pattern recognition

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC OPTIMIZATION; BREAST IMAGING; BREAST MASS; CAD SYSTEM; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DETECTION PROBLEMS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; DIRECT TRANSFER; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; HIGH POTENTIAL; IMAGE INFORMATICS; IMAGE SIMILARITY; IMAGING MODALITY; LARGE DATABASE; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MAMMOGRAPHIC MASS; MASS DETECTION; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION ALGORITHMS; PRE-PROCESSING STEP; REGIONS OF INTEREST; SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAMS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; IMAGE MATCHING; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PATTERN RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; TEMPLATE MATCHING; X RAY SCREENS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; FILM; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SCREENING TEST;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 80052877089     PISSN: 15320464     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Cheng H., Shi X., Min R., Hu L., Cai X., Du H. Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recognit 2006, 39:646-668.
2. Oliver A., Freixenet J., Mart J., Prez E., Pont J., Denton E.R.E., et al. A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Med Image Anal 2010, 14(2):87-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2009.12.005. 10.1016/j.media.2009.12.005.
3. Lai S.M., Li X., Biscof W.F. On techniques for detecting circumscribed masses in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1989, 8(4):377-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/42.41491. 10.1109/42.41491.
4. te Brake G.M., Karssemeijer N. Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18(7):628-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/42.790462. 10.1109/42.790462.
5. Oliver A., Freixenet J., Peracaula M., Marti J. Mass segmentation using a pattern matching approach with a mutual information based metric. Front Art Intell Appl 2005, 131:123-130.
6. Constantinidis A., Fairhurst M., Rahman A. A new multi-expert decision combination algorithm and its application to the detection of circumscribed masses in digital mammograms. Pattern Recognit 2001, 34:1527-1537.
7. Tourassi G.D., Vargas-Voracek R., David J., Catarious M., Carey J., Floyd E. Computer-assisted detection of mammographic masses: a template matching scheme based on mutual information. Med Phys 2003, 30:2123-2130.
8. Tourassi G.D., Haarawood B., Singh S., Lo J.Y., Floyd C.E. Evaluation of information-theoretic similarity measures for content-based retrieval and detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 2007, 34:140-150.
9. Freixenet J., Oliver A., Mart R., Llad X., Pont J., Prez E., et al. Eigendetection of masses considering false positive reduction and breast density information. Med Phys 2008, 35(5):1840-1853.
10. Tourassi G.D., Harrawood B., Singh S., Lo J.Y. Information-theoretic cad system in mammography: entropy-based indexing for computational efficiency and robust performance. Med Phys 2007, 34:3193-3204.
11. Mazurowski M.A., Habas P.A., Zurada J.M., Tourassi G.D. Decision optimization of case-based computer aided decision systems using genetic algorithms with application to mammography. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:895-908.
12. Mazurowski M.A., Zurada J.M., Tourassi G.D. Selection of examples in case-based computer-aided decision systems. Phys Med Biol 2008, 53:6079-6096.
13. Mazurowski M.A., Zurada J.M., Tourassi G.D. An adaptive incremental approach to constructing ensemble classifiers: application in an information-theoretic computer-aided decision system for detection of masses in mammograms. Med Phys 2009, 36:2976-2984.
14. Tourassi G.D., Mazurowski M.A., Harrawood B.P., Krupinski E.A. Exploring the potential of context-sensitive cade in screening mammography. Med Phys 2010, 37:5728-5736.
15. Pluim J.P.W., Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22(8):986-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2003.815867. 10.1109/TMI.2003.815867.
16. Tourassi GD, Sharma AC, Singh S, Saunders RS, Lo JY, Samei E, et al. Knowledge transfer across breast cancer screening modalities: a pilot study using an information-theoretic cade system for mass detection. In: Proceeding of international workshop on digital mammography; 2008.
17. Heath M, Bowyer K, Kopans D, Kegelmeyer WP, Moore R, Chang K, et al. Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In: Digital mammography. Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on digital mammography. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. p. 457-60.
18. Singh S., Tourassi G.D., Baker J.A., Samei E., Lo J.Y. Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach. Med Phys 2008, 35(8):3626-3636.
19. Ike III RC, Singh S, Harrawood B, Tourassi GD. Effect of roi size on the performance of an information-theoretic cad system in mammography: multi-size fusion analysis. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 6915; 2008. p. 691527.
20. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997, 16(2):187-198.
21. Sahiner B., Chan H.-P., Petrick N., Wei D., Helvie M.A., Adler D.D., et al. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue: a convolution neural network classifier with spatial domain and texture images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996, 15:598-610.
22. Suzuki K., Shiraishi J., Abe H., MacMahon H., Doi K. False-positive reduction in computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detecting nodules in chest radiographs by means of massive training artificial neural network. Acad Radiol 2005, 12(2):191-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.017. 10.1016/j.acra.2004.11.017.
23. Giger M.L., Doi K., MacMahon H. Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. 3. Automated detection of nodules in peripheral lung fields. Med Phys 1988, 15(2):158-166.
24. Catarious D.M., Baydush A.H., Floyd C.E. Incorporation of an iterative, linear segmentation routine into a mammographic mass cad system. Med Phys 2004, 31(6):1512-1520.
25. Wei J., Chan H.-P., Sahiner B., Zhou C., Hadjiiski L.M., Roubidoux M.A., et al. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis. Med Phys 2009, 36(10):4451-4460.
26. Skalak DB. Prototype and feature selection by sampling and random mutation hill climbing algorithms. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on machine learning; 1994. p. 293-301.
27. Chakraborty D. The FROC, AFROC and DROC variants of the ROC analysis. Handbook of medical imaging. Bellingham, Wash; 2000. p. 771-96.
28. Chan H.-P., Wei J., Sahiner B., Rafferty E.A., Wu T., Roubidoux M.A., et al. Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience. Radiology 2005, 237(3):1075-1080. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041657. 10.1148/radiol.2373041657.
29. Reiser I., Nishikawa R.M., Giger M.L., Wu T., Rafferty E.A., Moore R., et al. Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys 2006, 33(2):482-491.
30. Chan H.-P., Wei J., Zhang Y., Helvie M.A., Moore R.H., Sahiner B., et al. Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: comparison of three approaches. Med Phys 2008, 35(9):4087-4095.