Some implications of biofuel development for engineering infrastructures in the United States

Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 581-592

  Ng, Tze Ling ^a   Cai, Ximing ^a   Ouyang, Yanfeng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Biorefineries; Ethanol; Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program; Transportation infrastructures; USA; Water infrastructures

Indexed keywords

BIOREFINERIES; RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD (RFS) PROGRAM; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURES; USA; WATER INFRASTRUCTURES;

ANOXIC SEDIMENTS; CULTIVATION; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; FUEL ECONOMY; INVESTMENTS; LEAD REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); POTABLE WATER; REFINING; WATER QUALITY; WATER RESOURCES; WATER SUPPLY; WATER TREATMENT;

BIOFUELS;

EID: 80052865174     PISSN: 1932104X     EISSN: 19321031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.309     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Report card for America's infrastructure. [Online]. ASCE (2009). Available at: [May 23, 2011].
2. Johansson DJA and Azar C, A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US. Clim Change 82(3):267-291 (2007).
3. O'Brien D and Woolverton M, How Grain Ethanol Plants Affect Local Grain Prices. Kansas State University, Research and Extension, Manhattan, Kansas (2009).
4. Rajagopal D, Sexton S, Hochman G, Roland-Holst D and Zilberman D, Model estimates food-versus-biofuel trade-off. Calif Agric 63(4):199-201 (2009).
5. Benjamin C and Houee-Bigot M, Measuring competition between non-food and food demand on world grain markets: is biofuel production compatible with pressure for food production? Presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1. Portland, Oregon (2007).
6. Chen X, Huang H, Khanna M and Önal H, Meeting the mandate for biofuels: implications for land use, greenhouse gas emissions and social welfare, in Proceedings of the NBER Meeting on Agricultural Economics and Biofuels, March 4-5. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts (2010).
7. Walsh ME, De La Torre Ugarte DG, Shapouri H and Slinsky SP, Bioenergy crop production in the United States: potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector. Environ Res Econ 24(4):313-333 (2003).
8. Dicks MR, Campiche J, Ugarte DDLT, Hellwinckel C, Bryant HL and Richardson JW, Land use implications of expanding biofuel demand. J Agr Appl Econ 41(02) (2009).
9. Tyner W and Taheripour F, Biofuels, policy options, and their implications: analyses using partial and general equilibrium approaches. J Agr Food Ind Org 6(2):9 (2008).
10. Jain AK, Khanna M, Erickson M and Huang H, An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States. GCB Bioenerg 2:217-234 (2010).
11. McLaughlin SB and Adams Kszos L, Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenerg 28(6):515-535 (2005).
12. Heaton EA, Clifton-Brown JC, Voigt TB, Jones BJ and Long SP, Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 9(4):433-451 (2004).
13. Cai X, Zhang X and Wang D, Land availability for biofuel production. Environ Sci Technol 45(1):334-339 (2011).
14. Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), Refinery locations. [Online] RFA (2011). Available at: [May 23, 2011].
15. Navarrete N, California biofuel sector suits up with new sugarcane facility. [Online]. EcoSeed, November 8 2010. Available at: [November 23, 2010].
16. Krauss C, Big oil warms to ethanol and biofuel companies. [Online]. The New York Times, 2009 May 26. Available at: [November 10, 2010].
17. St. John J, Mascoma starts up cellulosic ethanol demo plant. [Online]. Greentech Media. 2009 February 25. Available at: [November 23, 2010].
18. Willett HG, Vonore biofuel plant opens. [Online]. Knoxville News Sentinel. 2010 January 30. Available at: [November 15, 2010].
19. McNew K and Griffith D, Measuring the impact of ethanol plants on local grain prices. Appl Econ Perspect Pol 27(2):164-180 (2005).
20. Haddad MA, Taylor G and Owusu F, Locational choices of the ethanol industry in the Midwest Corn Belt. Econ Dev Q 24(1):74 (2010).
21. Blackwell S, Proposed ethanol plants would produce 690 tons of pollutants. [Online]. Southeast Missourian, 2007 October 28. Available at: [November 15, 2010].
22. Dooley F, Infrastructure for the bioeconomy. Risk, Infrastructure and Industry Evolution, Proceedings of Conference, June 24-25. Berkeley, California (2008).
23. Richard TL, Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure. Science 329:793-796 (2010).
24. Suh K and Suh S, Economic and environmental implications of corn stover densification options for biofuel in Minnesota. Trans ASABE 53(4):1183-1192 (2010).
25. Bai Y, Hwang T, Kang S and Ouyang Y, Biofuel refinery location and supply chain planning under traffic congestion. Transport Res B-Meth 45(1):162-175 (2011).
26. Mahmudi H and Flynn PC. Rail vs truck transport of biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129-132:88-103 (2006).
27. Morrow WR, Griffin WM and Matthews HS, Modeling switchgrass derived cellulosic ethanol distribution in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 40(9):2877-2886 (2006).
28. Association of American Railroads (AAR), Railroads and ethanol. [Online] AAR 2011. Available at: [May 23, 2011].
29. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Freight Railroads: Industry Health has Improved, but Concerns about Competition and Capacity should be Addressed, Report to Congressional Requesters. US Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC (2006).
30. Bevill K, Deadly train accident continues to be investigated. [Online]. Ethanol Producer Magazine, 2009 June 3. Available at: [November 16, 2010].
31. Jessen H, Riding the rails. [Online]. Ethanol Producer Magazine, 2006 October 26. Available at: [November 23, 2010].
32. Ginder RG, Potential infrastructure constraints on ethanol production in Iowa. Ames. Iowa State University, University Extension, Iowa (2006).
33. Bevill K, Blending terminals open in CA, MS. [Online]. Ethanol Producer Magazine. January 4 2010. Available at: [November 19, 2010].
34. Madrigal A, Ethanol could be weak link in California energy network. [Online]. San Francisco Sentinel, December 18 2008. Available at: [November 16, 2010].
35. Keeney D, Water use by Ethanol Plants: Potential Challenges. Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Minneapolis, Minnesota (2006).
36. Postel SL, Entering an era of water scarcity: the challenges ahead. Ecol Appl 10(4):941-948 (2000).
37. Batmanathan M, Not in their front yards.[Online]. Illinois Times, October 25 2006. Available at: [November 15, 2010].
38. Nebraska Ethanol Board, Nebraska Ethanol Industry: Ethanol Plants in Nebraska. [Online]. Available at: [May 23, 2011].
39. McGuire VL, Water-level changes in the High Plains aquifer, predevelopment to 2005 and 2003-2005, Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5324. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia (2007).
40. Chiu YW, Walseth B and Suh S, Water embodied in bioethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 43(8):2688-2692 (2009).
41. Hutson SS, Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2000, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1268. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia (2004).
42. McIsaac GF, David MB and Mitchell CA, Miscanthus and switchgrass production in Central Illinois: impacts on hydrology and inorganic nitrogen leaching. J Environ Qual 39:1790-1799 (2010).
43. VanLoocke A, Bernacchi CJ and Twine T, The impacts of Miscanthus × giganteus production on the Midwest US hydrologic cycle. GCB Bioenerg 2(4):180-191(2010).
44. Abraham N, Hema PS, Saritha EK and Subramannian S, Irrigation automation based on soil electrical conductivity and leaf temperature. Agric Water Manage 45(2):145-157 (2000).
45. Phene CJ and Howell TA, Soil sensor control of high-frequency irrigation systems. Trans ASAE 27(2):392-396 (1984).
46. Levine AD and Asano T, Recovering sustainable water from wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 38(11):201A-208A (2004).
47. Asano T and Cotruvo JA, Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. Water Res 38(8):1941-1951 (2004).
48. Groundwater Replenishment System, New water you can count on. [Online]. Available at: [May 23, 2011].
49. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), National Agricultural Statistics Service. [Online]. Available at: [May 23, 2011].
50. Andraski TWB and Larry G, Relationships between phosphorus levels in soil and in runoff from corn production systems. J Environ Qual 32(1):310 (2003).
51. Jaynes DB, Colvin TS, Karlen DL, Cambardella CA and Meek DW, Nitrate loss in subsurface drainage as affected by nitrogen fertilizer rate. J Environ Qual 30:1305-1314 (2001).
52. City of Bloomington, FAQ's for the northern research area [Online]. Available at: [May 23, 2011].
53. Kapoor A, Nitrate removal from drinking water-review. J Environ Eng 123(4):371-380 (1997).
54. Gilley JE, Doran JW, Karlen DL and Kaspar TC, Runoff, erosion, and soil quality characteristics of a former conservation reserve program site. J Soil Water Conserv 52(3):189 (1997).
55. Martinelli LA and Filoso S, Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: Environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl 18(4):885-898 (2008).
56. Yuan Y, Dabney SM and Bingner RL, Cost effectiveness of agricultural BMPs for sediment reduction in the Mississippi Delta. J Soil Water Conserv 57(5):259 (2002).
57. Park SW, Mostaghimi S, Cooke RA and McClellan PW, BMP impacts on watershed runoff, sediment, and nutrient yields. Water Resour Bull 30(6):1011-1023 (1994).
58. Ng TL, Eheart JW, Cai X and Miguez F, Modeling miscanthus in the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) to simulate its water quality effects as a bioenergy crop. Environ Sci Technol 44(18):7138-7144 (2010).
59. Nelson RG, Ascough JC and Langemeier MR, Environmental and economic analysis of switchgrass production for water quality improvement in northeast Kansas. J Environ Manage 79(4):336-347 (2006).
60. Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M, Wu M, Snyder SW and Lafreniere L, Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43(15):6094-6100 (2009).
61. Fiksel J, Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy 2(2):14-21 (2006).
62. Li X, Peng F, Bai Y and Ouyang Y, Effects of disruption risks on biorefinery location design: discrete and continuous models. Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; January 23-27. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC (2011).
63. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J et al., Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238-1240 (2008).
64. Spatari S, Zhang Y and MacLean HL, Life cycle assessment of switchgrass- and corn stover-derived ethanol-fueled automobiles. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9750-9758 (2005).