Estimating trends in US income inequality using the Current Population Survey: The importance of controlling for censoring

Journal of Economic Inequality

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 393-415

  Burkhauser, Richard V ^a   Feng, Shuaizhang ^b,c   Jenkins, Stephen P ^d   Larrimore, Jeff ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI UNIVERSITY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Censoring; CPS; Time trend; Topcoding; US income inequality

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052838240     PISSN: 15691721     EISSN: 15738701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10888-010-9131-6     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acemoglu, D.: Cross-country inequality trends. Econ. J. 113, F121-F149 (2003).
2. Atkinson, A. B.: Top incomes in the UK over the twentieth century. J. R. Stat. Soc. 168, 325-343 (2005).
3. Atkinson, A. B., Brandolini, A.: Promises and pitfalls in the use of secondary data sets: income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. J. Econ. Lit. 39(3), 771-799 (2001).
4. Atkinson, A. B., Leigh, A.: The distribution of top incomes in Australia. Econ. Rec. 83(262), 247-61 (2007).
5. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T.: Top Incomes Over the Twentieth Century: a Contrast Between Continental European and English Speaking Countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
6. Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L., Smeeding, T.: Income Distribution in OECD Countries. Evidence From the Luxembourg Income Study. Social Policy Studies no. 18. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris (1995).
7. Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., Saez, E.: Top Incomes in the Long Run of History. NBER Working Paper w15408. http://www. nber. org/papers/w15408 (2009). Accessed 13 December 2009.
8. Autor, D., Katz, L., Kearney, M.: Trends in U. S. wage inequality: revising the revisionists. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90(2), 300-323 (2008).
9. Bach, S., Corneo, G., Steiner, V.: From bottom to top: the entire income distribution in Germany, 1992-2003. Rev. Income Wealth 55(2), 303-330 (2009).
10. Bandourian, R., McDonald, J. B., Turley, R. S.: A comparison of parametric models of income distribution across countries and over time. Estad. 55, 135-152 (2003).
11. Bishop, J. A., Chiou, J., Formby, J. P.: Truncation bias and the ordinal evaluation of income inequality. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 12, 123-127 (1994).
12. Bordley, R. F., McDonald, J. B., Mantrala, A.: Something new, something old: parametric models for the size distribution of income. J. Income Distrib. 6, 91-103 (1996).
13. Brachmann, K., Stich, A., Trede, M.: Evaluating parametric income distribution models. Allg. Stat. Arch. 80, 285-298 (1996).
14. Burkhauser, R. V., Larrimore, J.: Trends in the relative economic well being of working-age men with disabilities: correcting the record using internal current population survey data. J. Disabil. Policy Stud. 20(3), 162-169 (2009).
15. Burkhauser, R. V., Butler, J. S., Feng, S., Houtenville, A.: Long-term trends in earnings inequality: what the CPS can tell us. Econ. Lett. 82, 295-299 (2004).
16. Burkhauser, R. V., Couch, K. A., Houtenville, A. J., Rovba, L.: Income inequality in the 1990s: re-forging a lost relationship? J. Income Distrib. 12(3-4), 8-35 (2003-2004).
17. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S. P., Larrimore, J.: Estimating trends in US income inequality using the current population survey: the importance of controlling for censoring. NBER Working paper 14247. http://www. nber. org/papers/w14247 (2008). Accessed 13 December 2009.
18. Burkhauser, R. V., Oshio, T., Rovba, L.: How the distribution of after-tax income changed over the 1990s business cycle: a comparison of the United States, Great Britain, Germany, and Japan. J. Income Distrib. 17(1), 87-109 (2008).
19. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S. P., Larrimore, J.: Recent trends in top income shares in the USA: reconciling estimates from March CPS and IRS tax return data. NBER Working Paper w15320. http://www. nber. org/papers/w15320 (2009). Accessed 13 Dec 2009.
20. Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Jenkins, S. P.: Using the P90/P10 ratio to measure US inequality trends with current population survey data: a view from inside the Census Bureau Vaults. Rev. Income Wealth 55(1), 166-185 (2009).
21. Card, D., DiNardo, J. E.: Skill-biased technological change and rising wage inequality: some problems and puzzles. J. Labor Econ. 20(4), 733-783 (2002).
22. Cowell, F. A.: Measurement of inequality. In: Atkinson, A. B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, pp. 87-166. Elsevier North Holland, Amsterdam (2000).
23. Cowell, F. A., Victoria-Feser, M.: Robustness properties of inequality measures. Econometrica 64, 77-101 (1996).
24. Daly, M. C., Valletta, R. G.: Inequality and poverty in the United States: the effect of rising dispersion of men's earnings and changing family behavior. Economica 73(289), 75-98 (2006).
25. Davidson, R., Flachaire, E.: Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequality and poverty measures. J Econom. 141, 141-166 (2007).
26. Dell, F.: Top incomes in Germany and Switzerland over the twentieth century. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 3(2-3), 412-421 (2005).
27. DiNardo, J., Fortin, N., Lemieux, T.: Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: a semi-parametric approach. Econometrica 64(5), 1001-1044 (1996).
28. Economists View. http://economistsview. typepad. com/economistsview/2007/01/increasing_ineq. html (2007). Accessed 24 February 2009.
29. Feenberg, D., Poterba, J.: Income inequality and the incomes of very high-income taxpayers: evidence from tax returns. In: Poterba, J. M. (ed.) Tax Policy and the Economy, 7, pp. 145-177. NBER/MIT Press, Cambridge (1993).
30. Feng, S., Burkhauser, R. V., Butler, J. S.: Levels and long-term trends in earnings inequality: overcoming current population survey censoring problems using the GB2 distribution. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 24(1), 57-62 (2006).
31. Fichtenbaum, R., Shahidi, H.: Truncation bias and the measurement of income inequality. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 6, 335-337 (1988).
32. Gottschalk, P., Smeeding, T. M.: Cross-national comparisons of earnings and income inequality. J. Econ. Lit. 35(2), 633-687 (1997).
33. Gottschalk, P., Danziger, S.: Inequality of wage rates, earnings and family income in the United States, 1975-2002. Rev. Income Wealth 51(2), 231-254 (2005).
34. Jenkins, S. P.: Distributionally-sensitive inequality indices and the GB2 income distribution. Rev. Income Wealth 55(2), 392-398 (2009).
35. Jenkins, S. P., van Kerm, P.: The measurement of economic inequality. In: Salverda, W., Nolan, B., Smeeding, T. M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook on Economic Inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
36. Jenkins, S. P., Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Larrimore, J.: Measuring inequality with censored data: a multiple imputation approach. ISER Working Paper 2009-04. Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, UK. http://www. iser. essex. ac. uk/publications/working-papers/iser/2009-04 (2009). Accessed 24 February 2009.
37. Jones, A. F., Weinberg, D. H.: The changing shape of the nation's income distribution. Current Population Reports, US Census Bureau, June 2000. http://www. census. gov/prod/2000pubs/p60-204. pdf (2000). Accessed 24 February 2009.
38. Juhn, C., Murphy, K. M., Pierce, B.: Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. J. Polit. Econ. 101(3), 410-442 (1993).
39. Kahn, L. M.: Collective bargaining and the interindustry wage structure: international evidence. Economica 65(260), 507-534.
40. Katz, L. F., Murphy, K. M.: Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: supply and demand factors. Q. J. Econ. 107(1), 35-78 (1992).
41. Kleiber, C., Kotz, S.: Statistical Size Distributions in Economics and Actuarial Sciences. Wiley, Hoboken (2003).
42. Larrimore, J., Burkhauser, R. V., Feng, S., Zayatz, L.: Consistent cell means for topcoded incomes in the public use March CPS (1976-2007). J. Econ. Soc. Meas. 33(2-3), 89-128 (2008).
43. Leigh, A.: How closely do top income shares track other measures of inequality? Econ. J. 117(524), F619-F633 (2007).
44. Lemieux, T.: Increasing residual wage inequality: composition effects, noisy data, or rising demand for skill? Am. Econ. Rev. 96(3), 461-498 (2006).
45. Levy, F., Murnane, R. J.: U. S. Earnings levels and earnings inequality: a review of recent trends and proposed explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 30(3), 1333-1381 (1992).
46. Lubotsky, D.: Chutes or ladders? A longitudinal analysis of immigrant earnings. J. Polit. Econ. 115(5), 820-866 (2007).
47. McDonald, J. B.: Some generalized functions for the size distribution of income. Econometrica 52, 647-663 (1984).
48. Piketty, T.: Income inequality in France, 1901-1998. J. Polit. Econ. 111(5), 1004-1042 (2003).
49. Piketty, T., Saez, E.: Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998. Q. J. Econ. 118(1), 1-39 (2003).
50. Pischke, J. S.: Individual income, incomplete information, and aggregate consumption. Econometrica 63, 805-840 (1995).
51. Reiter, J. P.: Inference for partially synthetic, public use microdata sets. Surv. Methodol. 29, 181-188 (2003).
52. Reynolds, A.: Income and Wealth. Greenwood Press, Westport (2006).
53. Rubin, D. B.: Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, New York (1987).
54. Ryscavage P.: A surge in growing income inequality? Monthly Labor Review, pp. 51-61. http://www. bls. gov/opub/mlr/1995/08/art5full. pdf (1995).
55. Saez, E.: http://elsa. berkeley. edu/~saez/ (2009). Accessed 24 Feb 2009.
56. Saez, E., Veall, M. R.: The evolution of high incomes in Northern America: lessons from Canadian evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(3), 831-849 (2005).
57. Shluter, C., Trede, M.: Tails of Lorenz curves. J. Econom. 109, 151-166 (2002).
58. Slemrod, J.: High-income families and the tax changes of the 1980s: the anatomy of behavioral response. In: Feldstein, M., Poterba, J. M. (eds.) Empirical Foundations of Household Taxation, pp. 193-226. University of Chicago Press (for NBER), Chicago (1996).
59. US Census Bureau. Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: Various Years. (August), Current Population Reports, Consumer Income. GPO, Washington, DC (2009).