The effect of inducement prizes on innovation: Evidence from the Ansari X Prize and the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge

R and D Management

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 360-377

  Kay, Luciano ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052822476     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: 14679310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00653.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abramowicz, M. (2003) Perfecting patent prizes. Vanderbilt Law Review, 56, 1, 114-236.
2. Anastas, P.T. and Zimmerman, J.B. (2007) Why We Need a Green Nano Award & How to Make It Happen. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
3. Armadillo Aerospace. (2008) Engine work, methane work, selling vehicles, Lynx. Available at
4. Bacharach, S.B. (1989) Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 4, 496-515.
5. Belfiore, M. (2007) Rocketeers. How a Visionary Band of Business Leaders, Engineers, and Pilots Is Boldly Privatizing Space. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
6. Best, J. (2008) Prize Proliferation. Sociological Forum, 23, 1, 1-27.
7. Bower, J.L. and Christensen, C.M. (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73, 43-53.
8. Boyle, A. (2004) Spaceship team gets its $10 million prize. Available at
9. Bromberg, J.L. (2000) NASA and the Space Industry. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10. Brunt, L., Lerner, J. and Nicholas, T. (2008) Inducement prizes and innovation. CEPR Discussion Paper. No. DP6917. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
11. Byko, M. (2004) SpaceShipOne, the Ansari X Prize, and the materials of the civilian space race. Journal of Operations Management, 56, 11, 24-28.
12. Che, Y.-K. and Gale, I. (2003) Optimal design of research contests. American Economic Review, 93, 3, 646-671.
13. Collins, P.Q. and Ashford, D.M. (1986) Potential economic implications of the development of space tourism. Presented at 37th IAF Congress, Innsbruck.
14. Courtland, R. (2009) Contenders square up in battle of the lunar landers. Available at
15. Culver, L., Escudero, L., Grindle, A., Hamilton, M. and Sowell, J. (2007) Policies, incentives, and growth in the newspace industry. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Paper.
16. Danto, E.A. (2008) Historical Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. DARPA. (2006) Report to congress. DARPA Prize Authority. Fiscal Year 2005 report in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 2374a: DARPA.
18. Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. (1980) Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D. Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1, 1-28.
19. Davidian, K. (2005) Prize competitions and NASA's centennial challenges program. International Lunar Conference 2005, DMG Associates.
20. Davidian, K. (2007) Prizes, prize culture, and NASA's Centennial challenges: DMG Associates under contract to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Headquarters, Washington DC, USA 20546-0001.
21. Davis, L. and Davis, J. (2004) How effective are prizes as incentives to innovation? Evidence from three 20th century contests. DRUID Summer Conference 2004, Elsinore, Denmark.
22. Diamandis, P. (2004) NASA Contests and prizes: how can they help advance space exploration? U.S. Congress, 108th Congress, House Committee on Science, 2nd Session. Available at
23. Discovery Channel. (2005) Black sky: the race for space & winning the X-Prize [DVD]. United States: Discovery Channel.
24. Fullerton, R.L. and McAfee, R.P. (1999) Auctioning entry into tournaments. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 3, 573-605.
25. Gopalakrishnan, S. and Damanpour, F. (1997) A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25, 1, 15-28.
26. Grishagin, V.A., Sergeyev, Y.D. and Silipo, D.B. (2001) Firms' R&D decisions under incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 2, 414-433.
27. Kalil, T. (2006) Prizes for Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
28. Kay, L. (2011) Managing Innovation Prizes in Government. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
29. Kemp, K. (2007) Destination Space. How Space Tourism Is Making Science Fiction a Reality. London: Virgin Books.
30. Kieff, S.F. (2001) Property rights and property rules for commercializing inventions. Minnesota Law Review, 85, 697-754.
31. Kremer, M. (2000) Creating markets for new vaccines. Part I: rationale. Cambridge, MA: NBER Working Paper.
32. de Laat, E.A.A. (1997) Patents or prizes: monopolistic R&D and asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 3, 369-390.
33. LeVine, S. (2008) Can X Prizes spur innovation? Available at
34. Linehan, D. (2008) SpaceShipOne. An Illustrated History. Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press.
35. Macauley, M.K. (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of prizes in a portfolio of financial incentives for space activities. Space Policy, 21, 2, 121-128.
36. Masten Space Systems. (2009) Masten Space Systems qualifies for $1 million prize. Available at
37. Masters, W.A. (2003) Research prizes: a mechanism to reward agricultural innovation in low-income regions. AgBioForum, 6, 1&2, 71-74.
38. Masters, W.A. and Delbecq, B. (2008) Accelerating innovation with prize rewards: history and typology of technology prizes and a new contest design for innovation in African agriculture. IPRI Conference on Advancing Agriculture in Developing Countries, Addis Ababa.
39. Maurer, S.M. and Scotchmer, S. (2004) Procuring knowledge. In: Libecap, G. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Growth, Volume 15, pp. 1-31. The Netherlands: JAI Press (Elsevier).
40. McDowell, W.H. (2002) Historical Research. A Guide. London: Pearson Education Limited.
41. McKinsey & Company. (2009) 'And the winner is ...' Capturing the promise of philanthropic prizes. Sydney, Australia: McKinsey & Company.
42. Mervis, J. (2006) U.S. science policy: legislator wants NSF to offer $1 billion energy prize. Science, 311, 5766, p. 1363.
43. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
44. Morring, F. (2009) Masten building on X-Prize. Available at
45. Nalebuff, B.J. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1983) Prizes and incentives: towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 14, 1, 21-43.
46. NASA. (2009) Masten and Armadillo claim lunar lander prizes. Available at
47. NASA. (2010) NASA selects two firms for experimental space vehicle test flights. Available at
48. National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (1999) Concerning Federally Sponsored Inducement Prizes in Engineering and Science. Washington, DC.: National Academy of Engineering.
49. National Research Council (NRC). (2007) Innovation Inducement Prizes at the National Science Foundation (No. 0-309-10465-3). Washington, DC.: The National Academies Press.
50. Newell, R.G. and Wilson, N.E. (2005) Technology prizes for climate change mitigation. Discussion Paper, Resources For The Future, Washington, DC.
51. Northrop Grumman. (2007) Northrop Grumman helps NASA shape plans for affordable lunar lander. Available at
52. OECD/Eurostat. (1997) Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD.
53. Pomerantz, W. (2006) Advancements through prizes. NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts 8th Annual Meeting, Tucson, AZ.
54. Pomerantz, W. (2007) NGLLC: early returns. Available at
55. Pomerantz, W. (2010) Lessons from NASA's centennial challenges. Available at
56. Saar, J. (2006) Prizes: The Neglected Innovation Incentive. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.
57. Saldaña, J. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
58. Schroeder, A. (2004) The Application and Administration of Inducement Prizes in Technology. Golden, CO: Independence Institute.
59. Scotchmer, S. (2005) Innovation and Incentives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Shavell, S. and van Ypersele, T. (1999) Rewards versus intellectual property rights. Working Paper 6956, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
61. Sidney, S. (1862) On the effect of prizes on manufactures. Journal of the Society of Arts, 25, 1, 1-52.
62. Sobel, D. (1996) Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of His Time. New York: Penguin.
63. SpaceRef.com. (2008) Rocket Racing Inc., Armadillo Aerospace and New Mexico create joint venture to launch private suborbital space transportation business. Available at
64. Stallbaumer, C. (2006) From longitude to altitude: inducement prize contests as instruments of public policy in science and technology. Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2006, 1, 117-158.
65. Stine, D.D. (2009) Federally funded innovation inducement prizes. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
66. Wei, M. (2007) Should Prizes Replace Patents? A Critique of the Medical Innovation Prize Act of 2005. Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law, 13, 25-45.
67. Wright, B.D. (1983) The economics of invention incentives: patents, prizes, and research contracts. American Economic Review, 73, 4, 691-707.
68. X Prize Foundation (XPF). (2004) Ansari X Prize. Available at
69. X Prize Foundation (XPF). (2007) Armadillo Aerospace nearly wins Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. Available at
70. X Prize Foundation (XPF). (2008) 2008 Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge. Available at
71. X Prize Foundation (XPF). (2009) 2009 Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge competition attempts scheduled. Available at