A method for the determination of speed-dependent semi-classical vector correlations from sliced image anisotropies

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 135, Issue 9, 2011, Pages

  Grubb, Michael P ^a   Warter, Michelle L ^a   Freeman, C Daniel ^a   West, Niclas A ^b   Usakoski, Kelly M ^b   Johnson, Kurt M ^a   Bartz, Jeffrey A ^b   North, Simon W ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b KALAMAZOO COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL EXPRESSIONS; ANGULAR MOMENTUM POLARIZATION; ANISOTROPY PARAMETERS; FRAGMENT VELOCITY; IMAGE INTENSITIES; ION IMAGES; ITERATIVE FITTING; MOMENT PARAMETERS; PUMP-PROBE; SLICED IMAGES; VECTOR CORRELATIONS;

ANISOTROPY;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 80052820467     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3631343     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. G. E. Hall and P. L. Houston, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 40, 375 (1989). 10.1146/annurev.pc.40.100189.002111
2. A. J. Orrewing and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 315 (1994). 10.1146/annurev.pc.45.100194.001531
3. R. J. Gordon and G. E. Hall, Adv. Chem. Phys. 96, 1 (1996).
4. S. W. North and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1864 (1996). 10.1063/1.471533
5. S. J. Klippenstein and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 5451 (1995). 10.1063/1.470529
6. T. P. Rakitzis and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 3341 (1999). 10.1063/1.480223
7. A. S. Bracker, E. R. Wouters, A. G. Suits, and O. S. Vasyutinskii, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6749 (1999). 10.1063/1.478668
8. T. P. Rakitzis and A. J. Alexander, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 224310 (2010). 10.1063/1.3429744
9. L. D. A. Siebbeles, M. Glassmaujean, O. S. Vasyutinskii, J. A. Beswick, and O. Roncero, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 3610 (1994). 10.1063/1.466402
10. R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1866 (1986). 10.1063/1.451131
11. M. L. Costen, S. W. North, and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 6735 (1999). 10.1063/1.480041
12. M. Dubs, U. Bruhlmann, and J. R. Huber, J. Chem. Phys. 84, 3106 (1986). 10.1063/1.450292
13. G. E. Hall, N. Sivakumar, P. L. Houston, and I. Burak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1671 (1986). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2771.5
14. S. W. North, J. Mueller, and G. E. Hall, Chem. Phys. Lett. 276, 103 (1997). 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00790-2
15. R. O. Loo, C. E. Strauss, H. P. Haerri, G. E. Hall, P. L. Houston, I. Burak, and J. W. Hepburn, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 85, 1185 (1989). 10.1039/f29898501185
16. R. Uberna and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 4705 (1995). 10.1063/1.469519
17. S. K. Lee, D. Townsend, O. S. Vasyutinskii, and A. G. Suits, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 1650 (2005).
18. B. Whitaker, Imaging in Molecular Dynamics (Cambridge University press, New York, 2003).
19. T. P. Rakitzis, Chem. Phys. Lett. 342, 121 (2001). 10.1016/S0009-2614(01) 00574-7 (Pubitemid 33642286)
20. T. P. Rakitzis, P. C. Samartzis, and T. N. Kitsopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (12), 123001 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.123001
21. J. A. Bartz, S. C. Everhart, and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 074310 (2010). 10.1063/1.3319747
22. V. K. Nestorov, R. D. Hinchliffe, R. Uberna, J. I. Cline, K. T. Lorenz, and D. W. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 7881 (2001). 10.1063/1.1408914 (Pubitemid 33073697)
23. A. L. Peden, R. D. Kieda, K. A. Breck, J. R. Basore, C. A. Kent, and J. A. Bartz, J. Phys. Chem. A 114, 10922 (2010). 10.1021/jp105026n
24. D. Townsend, M. P. Minitti, and A. G. Suits, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 74, 2530 (2003). 10.1063/1.1544053
25. C. R. Gebhardt, T. P. Rakitzis, P. C. Samartzis, V. Ladopoulos, and T. N. Kitsopoulos, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 3848 (2001). 10.1063/1.1403010
26. S. K. Lee, R. Silva, S. Thamanna, O. S. Vasyutinskii, and A. G. Suits, J. Chem. Phys. 125, (2006). 10.1063/1.2357948 (Pubitemid 44570795)
27. T. P. Rakitzis and T. N. Kitsopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9228 (2002). 10.1063/1.1473801 (Pubitemid 34632508)
28. K. S. Dooley, M. P. Grubb, J. Geidosch, M. A. van Beek, G. C. Groenenboom, and S. W. North, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 4770 (2009). 10.1039/b823004h
29. H. Kim, J. Park, T. C. Niday, and S. W. North, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 174303 (2005). 10.1063/1.2083487 (Pubitemid 41567402)
30. R. Uberna, R. D. Hinchliffe, and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9847 (1996). 10.1063/1.472935
31. V. K. Nestorov and J. I. Cline, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 5287 (1999). 10.1063/1.479806
32. T. P. Rakitzis, G. E. Hall, M. L. Costen, and R. N. Zare, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 8751 (1999). 10.1063/1.480223
33. C. H. Greene and R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 33, 119 (1982). 10.1146/annurev.pc.33.100182.001003
34. G. E. Hall and M. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10911 (1993). 10.1021/j100144a003
35. T. P. Rakitzis, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 204301 (2010). 10.1063/1.3506578
36. D. C. Robie, M. Hunter, J. L. Bates, and H. Reisler, Chem. Phys. Lett. 193, 413 (1992). 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85651-P
37. C. H. Hsieh, Y. S. Lee, A. Fujii, S. H. Lee, and K. P. Liu, Chem. Phys. Lett. 277, 33 (1997). 10.1016/S0009-2614(97)00884-1
38. G. E. Busch and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 3638 (1972). 10.1063/1.480061
39. T. Suzuki, V. P. Hradil, S. A. Hewitt, P. L. Houston, and B. J. Whitaker, Chem. Phys. Lett. 187, 257 (1991). 10.1016/0009-2614(91)90422-6
40. A. V. Demyanenko, V. Dribinski, H. Reisler, H. Meyer, and C. X. W. Qian, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7383 (1999). 10.1063/1.480061
41. R. P. Baker, M. L. Costen, G. Hancock, G. A. D. Ritchie, and D. Summerdeld, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2, 661 (2000). 10.1039/a907955f
42. Error limits are defined as the parameter values for which the resulting variance becomes greater than twice the variance of the best fit.
43. S. L. Meyer, Data Analysis for Scientists and engineers (John Wiley Sons Inc, New York, 1975).
44. M. P. Grubb, M. L. Warter, A. G. Suits, and S. W. North, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 2455 (2010). 10.1021/jz1008888
45. M. P. Grubb, M. L. Warter, K. M. Johnson, and S. W. North, J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 3218 (2011). 10.1021/jp200110e
46. For this particular case the apparent speed distribution was not found to vary greatly between the different image geometries. The true speed distribution can however vary greatly from the apparent speed distribution of a particular image due to the detection selectivity of the probe laser and cylindrical symmetry breaking of the spatial anisotropy. The easiest way to obtain the true speed distribution is to use the X pump geometry and saturate the probe detection with a high laser power.