Measuring and improving rationale clarity in a university office building design process

Journal of Architectural Engineering

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 97-111

  Haymaker, John Riker ^a   Chachere, John Marvin ^a   Senescu, Reid Robert ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambiguity; Clarity; Collaboration; Decisions; Design; Engineering; Management; Organizations; Rationale

Indexed keywords

AMBIGUITY; CLARITY; COLLABORATION; DECISIONS; RATIONALE;

ENGINEERING; MANAGEMENT; OFFICE BUILDINGS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

DESIGN;

EID: 80052818291     PISSN: 10760431     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000041     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chachere, J., and Haymaker, J. (2011). Framework for measuring rationale clarity of AEC design decisions. J. Archit. Eng., 17 (3), 86-96. JAEIED 1076-0431
2. Chachere, J., Kunz, J., and Levitt, R. (2004). Can you accelerate your project using extreme collaboration? A model based analysis. Technical Rep. T152, Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
3. Clevenger, C., and Haymaker, J. (2010). The need to measure the guidance afforded by design strategies. CIFE Technical Rep. 190, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
4. Eastman, C. M., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., and Liston, K. (2008). BIM handbook: A guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, architects, engineers, contractors, and fabricators, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
5. DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, W. Powell, and, P. DiMaggio, eds., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Edwards, W., Miles, R., and, von Winterfeldt, D., eds. (2007). Advances in decision analysis, Cambridge, New York.
7. Gane, V., and Haymaker, J. (2010). Benchmarking conceptual high-rise design processes. J. Archit. Eng., 16 (3), 100-111. JAEIED 1076-0431
8. Hartmann, T., Fischer, M., and Haymaker, J. (2009). Implementing information systems with project teams using ethnographic-Action research. Adv. Eng. Inform., 23 (1), 57-67. 1474-0346 10.1016/j.aei.2008.06.006
9. Haymaker, J. (2006). Communicating, integrating, and improving multidisciplinary design narratives. Int. Conf. on Design Computing and Cognition, Springer, Netherlands, 635-653.
10. Haymaker, J., and Chachere, J. (2006). Coordinating goals, preferences, options, and analyses for the Stanford living laboratory feasibility study. Lecture notes in computer science, No. 4200, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 320-327. (Pubitemid 44812068)
11. Iyengar, S. S., and Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Pers. Social Psych., 79 (6), 995-1006. JPSPB2
12. Keeney, R., and von Winterfeldt, D. (2007). Practical value models. Advances in decision analysis, W. Edwards, R. Miles, and, D. von Winterfeldt, eds., Cambridge, New York.
13. Keeney, R., and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
14. Lichtig, W. A. (2005). Sutter health: Developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery. Lean Constr. J., 2 (1), 105-112. 1555 -1369
15. March, J., and, Olsen, J., eds. (1985). Ambiguity and choice in organizations, Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, Norway.
16. McGregor, A. I., and Roberts, C. (2003). Using the SPeAR assessment tool in sustainable master planning. Proc., U.S. Green Building Conf., Pittsburgh,.
17. Moran, T., and, Carroll, J., eds. (1996). Design rationale: Concepts, techniques, and use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Perrow, C. (1967). The neo-Weberian model. Complex organizations, McGraw-Hill, New York, 119-131.
19. Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.
20. Simon, H. (1977). The new science of management decision, 3rd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. Stanford Univ. (2001). Project delivery process (PDP). http://cpm.stanford.edu/pdp.pdf (Mar. 10, 2008).
22. Stanford Univ. (2002). The guidelines for sustainable buildings. http://cpm.stanford.edu/process-new/Sustainable-Guidelines.pdf (Mar. 10, 2008).
23. Stanford Univ. (2003). Seismic engineering guidelines. http://cpm.stanford.edu/process-new/Seismic.pdf (Mar. 10, 2008).
24. Stanford Univ. (2005). Guidelines for life cost analysis. http://cpm.stanford.edu/process-new/LCCA121405.pdf (Mar. 10, 2008).
25. Stinchcombe, A. (1959). Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: A comparative study. Administrative Sci. Q., 4, 168-187. ASCQAG 0001-8392 10.2307/2390676
26. U.S. Green Building Council. (2008). LEED for new construction and major renovations, Version 2.2. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=1095 (Oct. 1, 2008).
27. Vresilovic, K., and Grauman, F. (2007). Bohlin, Cywinski, Jackson and the Stanford University Graduate School of Business Knight Management Center. CEE 215: Goals and methods of sustainable building design, Stanford Univ., Palo Alto, CA.
28. Watson, I., and Perera, S. (1997). "Case-based design: A review and analysis of building design applications." Artif. Intell. Eng. Des. Anal. Manuf., 11(1), 59-87. (Pubitemid 127588586)