Comparing developed MLUAT (mobile learning usability attribute testing) methodology with qualitative user testing method and heuristics evaluation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 578, Issue , 2011, Pages 516-523

  Fetaji, Majlinda ^a   Fetaji, Bekim ^a  

^a Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies   (Macedonia)

Author keywords

e learning; learner's environment; m learning; mobile devices

Indexed keywords

LEARNER'S ENVIRONMENT; M-LEARNING; MOBILE LEARNING; USABILITY ATTRIBUTES; USABILITY OF MOBILE APPLICATIONS; USABILITY TESTING; USER TESTING;

E-LEARNING; MOBILE DEVICES;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 80052814314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2023607.2023694     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Fetaji M., Fetaji B., (2008a), "Universities go Mobile - Case Study Experiment in Using Mobile Devices" In the proceedings of ITI 2008 - 30th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, IEEE conference, Cavtat, 23-26 June 2008, pp (123 - 128).
2. Fetaji M. Fetaji, B. (2008b)."Usability testing and evaluation of a mobile software solution: A case study" - IEEE conference, ITI, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 June 2008, pp (501 - 506).
3. Fetaji, M., Fetaji, B. (2009),"Devising Usability Framework For Mobile Learning Software Solutions, EEEL 2009 : "International Conference on e-Education and e- Learning", Paris, France, June 24-26, 2009
4. Ssemugabi S., Villiers R. d., (2007), " A Comparative Study of Two Usability Evaluation Methods Using a Web-Based E-Learning Application", In the Proceedings of SAICSIT 2007, 2 - 3 October, Sunshine Coast, South Africa. Accessed from ACM 978-1- 59593-775
5. Nielsen J., (2000a) "Why You Only Need to Test With 5 Users", Alertbox, March, 2000, Available online at: 12.012.2007 http://www.useit.com/ alertbox/20000319.html
6. Nielsen, J., (2000b) How to Conduct a Heuristic Evaluation. Available online at: 12.02.2007 http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic- evaluation.html
7. Nielsen J. (2003) Quantitative Studies: How Many Users to Test? Alertbox, June, 2006: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/quantitative-testing.html
8. Nielsen, J. (1994a) "Ten Usability Heuristics", (Available online at: http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic-list.html)
9. ]Nielsen, J. (1994b). Heuristic evaluation. In Nielsen, J., and Mack, R.L (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York NY.
10. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the User Interface. Addison Wesley Longman, 3e edition.
11. Kukulska-Hulme A., Traxler J. (2005) Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. Routledge: London.
12. Killi, K. (2002, August 29-30). Evaluation WAP Usability: "What Usability? In the Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'02). Växjö, Sweden.
13. Jones, M., Marsden, G., Mohd-Nasir, N., Boone, K., & Buchanan, G. (1999, May 11-14). Improving Web Interaction on small displays. In the Proceeding of the Eighth International Conference on World Wide Web, Toronto, Canada.
14. Nokelainen, P. (2004). Conceptual Definition of the Technical and Pedagogical Usability Criteria for Digital Learning Material. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 4249-4254). Chesapeake, VA: AACE
15. Chittaro, L., & Cin, P. D. (2002). Evaluating Interface Design Choices on WAP Phones: Navigation and Selection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 237-244.
16. MacKenzie S. and Zhang Sh. X. 1999, "The design and evaluation of a high performance soft keyboard". In the Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, 1999. ACM.
17. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability Engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.