Probabilistic uncertainty analysis of an FRF of a structure using a Gaussian process emulator

Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2962-2975

  Fricker, Thomas E ^a   Oakley, Jeremy E ^b   Sims, Neil D ^b   Worden, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Envelope frequency response function; Finite element model; Gaussian process; Metamodel; Probabilistic uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN; ENVELOPE FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; META MODEL; PROBABILISTIC UNCERTAINTY;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FREQUENCY RESPONSE; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC);

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 80052803648     PISSN: 08883270     EISSN: 10961216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. R. Ghanem, and P. Spanos Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach 2003 Dover Publications Mineola, NY
2. B. Lallemand, A. Cherki, T. Tison, and P. Level Fuzzy modal finite element analysis of structures with imprecise material properties J. Sound Vib. 220 1999 353 365
3. G. Plessis, B. Lallemand, T. Tison, and P. Level Fuzzy modal parameters J. Sound Vib. 233 2000 797 812
4. L. Hinke, F. Dohnal, B. Mace, T. Waters, and N. Ferguson Component mode synthesis as a framework for uncertainty analysis J. Sound Vib. 324 2009 161 178
5. S. Donders, D. Vandepitte, J. Van de Peer, and W. Desmet Assessment of uncertainty on structural dynamic responses with the short transformation method J. Sound Vib. 288 2005 523 549 (Pubitemid 41360483)
6. H. De Gersem, D. Moens, W. Desmet, and D. Vandepitte A fuzzy finite element procedure for the calculation of uncertain frequency response functions of damped structures: Part 2 - Numerical case studies J. Sound Vib. 288 2005 463 486 (Pubitemid 41360481)
7. A. O'Hagan, C. Buck, A. Daneshkhah, J. Eiser, P. Garthwaite, D. Jenkinson, J. Oakley, and T. Rakow Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts Probabilities 2006 John Wiley Chichester
8. J. Hammersley, and D. Handscomb Monte Carlo Methods 1964 Taylor & Francis
9. E. El Tabach, L. Lancelot, I. Shahrour, and Y. Najjar Use of artificial neural network simulation metamodelling to assess groundwater contamination in a road project Math. Comput. Model. 45 2007 766 776 (Pubitemid 44937540)
10. H. Drucker, C. Burges, L. Kaufman, A. Smola, and V. Vapnik Support vector regression machines Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 1997 155 161
11. L. Wang Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications 2005 GmbH, Springer
12. T. Lew, A. Spencer, F. Scarpa, K. Worden, A. Rutherford, and F. Hemez Identification of response surface models using genetic programming Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 20 2006 1819 1831 (Pubitemid 44205424)
13. J. Dejean, G. Blanc, Managing uncertainties on production predictions using integrated statistical methods, in: Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1999.
14. A. Rutherford, D. Inman, G. Park, and F. Hemez Use of response surface metamodels for identification of stiffness and damping coefficients in a simple dynamic system Shock Vib. 12 2005 317 331 (Pubitemid 41526881)
15. A. O'Hagan Curve fitting and optimal design for prediction J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 40 1978 1 42
16. A.G. Journel, and C.J. Huijbregts Mining Geostatistics 1978 Academic Press
17. N. Cressie Statistics for Spacial Data 1991 John Wiley
18. C.E. Rasmussen, and C.K.I. Williams Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning 2006 MIT Press
19. C. Currin, T. Mitchell, M. Morris, and D. Ylvisaker Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 86 1991 953 963
20. M. Morris, T. Mitchell, and D. Ylvisaker Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: use of derivatives in surface prediction Technometrics 1 1993 243 255
21. S. Conti, and A. O'Hagan Bayesian emulation of complex multi-output and dynamic computer models J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 140 2010 640 651
22. J. Rougier Efficient emulators for multivariate deterministic functions J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 17 2008 827 843
23. M. Kennedy, C. Anderson, A. O'Hagan, M. Lomas, I. Woodward, J. Gosling, and A. Heinemeyer Quantifying uncertainty in the biospheric carbon flux for England and Wales J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A (Stat. Soc.) 171 2008 109 135
24. T.E. Fricker, J. Oakley, N.M. Urban, Multivariate Emulators with Nonseparable Covariance Structures, MUCM Technical Report, 2010.
25. H. Wackernagel Multivariate Geostatistics 1995 Springer
26. M. Goulard, and M. Voltz Linear coregionalization model: tools for estimation and choice of cross-variogram matrix J. Math. Geol. 21 1992 269 286
27. A.E. Gelfand, A.M. Schmidt, S. Banerjee, and C.F. Sirmans Nonstationary multivariate process modelling through spatially varying coregionalization Test 13 2004 1 50
28. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code Technometrics 21 1979 239 245 (Pubitemid 9452235)
29. J. Loeppky, J. Sacks, and W. Welch Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: a practical guide Technometrics 51 2009 366 376
30. J.E. Oakley, and A. O'Hagan Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs Biometrika 89 2002 769 784 (Pubitemid 41311943)
31. B. Silverman Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis 1998 Chapman & Hall, CRC
32. E. Balmes, J. Wright, GARTEUR group on ground vibration testing: results from the test of a single structure by 12 laboratories in Europe, in: Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference, Orlando, 1997.
33. C. Mares, M. Friswell, and J. Mottershead Model updating using robust estimation Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16 2002 169 183 (Pubitemid 34449544)