Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: Minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 93 B, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1194-1200

  Akiyama, H ^a,b   Yamamoto, K ^a,b   Tsukanaka, M ^a,b   Kawanabe, K ^a,b   Otsuka, H ^a,c   So, K ^a   Goto, K ^a   Nakamura, T ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KOBE CITY MEDICAL CENTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c AICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ASEPTIC LOOSENING; BONE ALLOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICE APPROVAL; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; KERBOULL TYPE ACETABULAR REINFORCEMENT DEVICE; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; RECURRENT DISLOCATION; REPEAT PROCEDURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052803462     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26598     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Berry DJ, Müller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:711-715.
2. Chen WM, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, McAuley JP, Engh CA. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2000;82-A:197-206. (Pubitemid 30097019)
3. Jasty M, Harris WH. Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990;72-B:63-67. (Pubitemid 20035818)
4. Lee BP, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL, Ilstrup DM. Bone-graft augmentation for acetabular deficiencies in total hip arthroplasty: results of long-term follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:503-510. (Pubitemid 29021304)
5. Schreurs BW, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ. Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting: 20 years of experience. Instr Course Lect 2001;50:221-228.
6. Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop 2000;378:155-168.
7. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:862-867. (Pubitemid 32523805)
8. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989;243:126-137. (Pubitemid 19165374)
9. Tanaka C, Shikata J, Ikenaga M, Takahashi M. Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:719-725. (Pubitemid 37176601)
10. Akiyama H, Morishima T, Takemoto M, et al. A novel technique for impaction bone grafting in acetabular reconstruction of revision total hip arthroplasty using an ex vivo compaction device. J Orthop Sci 2011;16;26-37.
11. Kawanabe K, Akiyama H, Onishi E, Nakamura T. Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:26-31. (Pubitemid 46218407)
12. Okano K, Miyata N, Enomoto H, Osaki M, Shindo H. Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 2010;25:594-599.
13. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 1976;121:20-32. (Pubitemid 8003188)
14. d'Aubigné RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1954;36-A:451-475.
15. Lunn JV, Kearns SS, Quinlan W, Murray P, Byrne JO. Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3-7 years. Acta Orthop 2005;76:296-302. (Pubitemid 41039342)
16. Baba T, Shitoto K. Revision of total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull and KT plates. Int Orthop 2010;34:341-347.
17. van Egmond N, De Kam DC, Gardeniers JW, Schreurs BW. Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup. Clin Orthop 2011;469:562-573.
18. Rudelli S, Honda E, Viriato SP, Libano G, Leite LF. Acetabular revision with bone graft and cementless cup. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:432-443.
19. Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Kvist J, et al. Acetabular revision with extensive allograft impaction and uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated implants: results after 9 (7-11) years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:1083-1091. (Pubitemid 350216988)
20. Jeffery M, Scott G, Freeman M. Failure of an uncemented non-porous metalbacked prosthesis with augmentation using impacted allograft for acetabular revision: 12- to 17-year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:182-186. (Pubitemid 36410537)
21. Zehntner MK, Ganz R. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:469-479. (Pubitemid 24321133)