Effect of Water Stress and Fungal Inoculation on Monoterpene Emission from an Historical and a New Pine Host of the Mountain Pine Beetle

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1013-1026

  Lusebrink, Inka ^a   Evenden, Maya L ^a   Blanchet, F Guillaume ^a   Cooke, Janice E K ^a   Erbilgin, Nadir ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Grosmannia clavigera; Monoterpenes; Mountain pine beetle; Pinus banksiana; Pinus contorta; Tree defense; VOCs

Indexed keywords

TERPENE; WATER;

BARK; BEETLE; BIOGENIC EMISSION; BOREAL FOREST; CONIFEROUS TREE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FUNGUS; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; INOCULATION; MONOTERPENE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; RANGE EXPANSION; SOIL WATER; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND; WATER AVAILABILITY; WATER STRESS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; MONOTERPENES; PINUS; WATER;

CANADA;

CLAVIGERA; COLEOPTERA; DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE; PINUS BANKSIANA; PINUS CONTORTA; PINUS MUGO;

EID: 80052792002     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: 15731561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-011-0008-3     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aukema, B. H., Powell, J. S., Clayton, M. K., and Raffa, K. F. 2010. Variation in complex semiochemical signals arising from insects and host plants. Environ. Entomol. 39: 874-882.
2. Blanch, J.-S., Peñuelas J., and Llusià, J. 2007. Sensitivity of terpene emissions to drought and fertilization in terpene-storing Pinus halepensis and non-storing Quercus ilex. Physiol. Plantarum 131: 221-225.
3. Blomquist, G. J., Figueroa-Teran, R., Aw, M., Song, M., Gorzalski, A., Abbott, N. L., Chang, E., and Tittiger, C. 2010. Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem. Mol. 40: 699-712.
4. Bohm, B. A. 2009. The Geography of Phytochemical Races. Springer, New York.
5. Borden, J. H., Pureswaran, D. S., and Lafontaine, J. P. 2008. Synergistic blends of monoterpenes for aggregation pheromones of the mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 101: 1266-1275.
6. Breshears, D. D., Myers, O. B., Meyer, C. W., Barnes, F. J., Zou, C. B., Allen, C. D., McDowell, N. G., and Pockman, W. T. 2009. Tree die-off in response to global change-type drought: Mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7: 185-189.
7. Bridges, J. R. 1987. Effects of terpenoid compounds on growth of symbiotic fungi associated with the southern pine beetle. Phytopathology 77: 83-85.
8. Carroll, A. L., Régnière, J., Logan, J. A., Taylor, S. W., Bentz, B. J., and Powell, J. A. 2006. Impacts of climate change on range expansion by the mountain pine beetle. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC. Mountain Pine Beetle Initiative Working Paper 2006-14. p. 20.
9. Cerezke, H. F. 1995. Egg gallery, brood production, and adult characteristics of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in three pine hosts. Can. Entomol. 127: 955-965.
10. Conn, J. E. 1981. Pheromone Production and Control Mechanisms in Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins. M. Sc. thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B. C.
11. Critchfield, W. B. 1957. Geographic Variation in Pinus contorta. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Maria Moors Cabot Found. Publ. 3.
12. Cullingham, C. I., Cooke, J. E. K., Dang, S., Davis, C. S., Cooke, B. J., and Coltman, D. W. 2011. Mountain pine beetle host-range expansion threatens the boreal forest. Mol. Ecol. 20: 2157-2171.
13. DeBruyne, M. and Warr, C. G. 2006. Molecular and cellular organization of insect chemosensory neurons. BioEssays 28: 23-34.
14. Erbilgin, N., Szele, A., Klepzig, K. D., and Raffa, K. F. 2001. Trap type, chirality of α-pinene, and geographic region affect sampling efficiency of root and lower stem insects in pine. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 1113-1121.
15. Faccoli, M., Blaženec, M., and Schlyter, F. 2005. Feeding response to host and nonhost compounds by males and females of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a tunneling microassay. J. Chem. Ecol. 31: 745-759.
16. Forrest, G. I. 1980. Geographical variation in the monoterpenes of Pinus contorta oleoresin. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 8: 343-359.
17. Franceschi, V. R., Krokene, P., Christiansen, E., and Krekling, T. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol. 167: 353-376.
18. Gollob, L. 1980. Monoterpene composition in bark beetle-resistant loblolly pine. Naturwissenschaften 67: 409-410.
19. Guenther, A. B., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R. 1991. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Observation with Eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development. J. Geophys. Res. 96: 10799-10808.
20. Heijari, J., Blandea, J. D., and Holopainen, J. K. 2011. Feeding of large pine weevil on Scots pine stem triggers localised bark and systemic shoot emission of volatile organic compounds. Environ. Exp. Bot. 71: 390-398.
21. Heil, M. and Karban, R. 2009. Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 137-144.
22. Hillel, D. 1998. Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
23. Himejima, M., Hobson, K. R., Otsuka, T., Wood, D. L., and Kubo, I. 1992. Antimicrobial terpenes from oleoresin of ponderosa pine tree (Pinus ponderosa): A defense mechanism against microbial invasion. J. Chem. Ecol. 18: 1809-1818.
24. Hodges, J. D. and Lorio Jr., P. L. 1975. Moisture stress and composition of xylem oleoresin in loblolly pine. For. Sci. 21: 283-290.
25. Huber, D. P. W., Gries, R., Borden, J. H., and Pierce Jr., H. D. 2000. A survey of antennal responses by five species if coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology 10: 103-113.
26. Huber, D. P. W., Philippe, R. N., Madilao, L. L., Sturrock, R. N., and Bohlmann, J. 2005. Changes in anatomy and terpene chemistry in roots of Douglas-fir seedlings following treatment with methyl jasmonate. Tree Physiol. 25: 1075-1083.
27. Jost, R. W., Rice, A. V., Langor, D. W., and Boluk, Y. 2008. Monoterpene emission from lodgepole and jack pine bark inoculatied with mountain pine beetle-associated fungi. J. Wood Chem. Tech. 28: 37-46.
28. Keeling, C. I. and Bohlmann, J. 2006. Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence on conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol. 170: 657-675.
29. Kesselmeier, J. and Staudt, M. 1999. Biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC): An overview on emission, physiology and ecology. J. Atmos. Chem. 33: 23-88.
30. Kishimoto, K., Matsui, K., Ozawa, R., and Takabayashi, J. 2006. Analysis of defensive responses activated by volatile allo-ocimene treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 67: 1520-1529.
31. Klepzig, K. D., Smalley, E. B., and Raffa, K. F. 1996. Combined chemical defenses against an insect-fungal complex. J. Chem. Ecol. 22: 1367-1388.
32. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
33. Legendre, P. and Durand, S. 2010. rdaTest: Canonical redundancy analysis (R package version 1. 7). URL http://www. bio. umontreal. ca/legendre/.
34. Lieutier, F., Yart, A., and Salle, A. 2009. Stimulation of tree defenses by ophiostomatoid fungi can explain attack success of bark beetles on conifers. Ann. Forest Sci. 66: 801-823.
35. Llusià, J. and Peñuelas, J. 1998. Changes in terpene content and emission in potted Mediterranean woody plants under severe drought. Can. J. Bot. 76: 1366-1373.
36. McDowell, N., Pockman, W. T., Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D. G., and Yepez, E. A. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178: 719-739.
37. Miller, D. R. and Borden, J. H. 1990. β-Phellandrene: Kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 2519-2531.
38. Moeck, H. A. and Simmons, C. S. 1991. Primary attraction of mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolitidae), to bolts of lodgepole pine. Can. Entomol. 123: 299-304.
39. Nebeker, T. E., Schmitz, R. F., Tisdale, R. A., and Hobson, K. R. 1995. Chemical and nutritional status of dwarf mistletoe, armillaria root rot, and comandra blister rust infected trees which may influence tree susceptibility to bark beetle attack. Can. J. Bot. 73: 360-369.
40. Niinemets, Ü., Reichstein, M., Staudt, M., Seufert, G., and Tenhunen, J. D. 2002. Stomatal constraints may affect emission of oxygenated monoterpenoids from the foliage of Pinus pinea. Plant Physiol. 130: 1371-1385.
41. Oksanen, j., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Sólymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., and Wagner, H. 2010. vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 1. 17-4. http://CRAN. R-project. org/package=vegan.
42. Pauly, G. and von Rudolff, E. 1971. Chemosystematic studies in the genus Pinus: the leaf oil of Pinus contorta var. latifolia. Can. J. Bot. 49: 1201-1210.
43. Pitman, G. B., Vité, J. P., Kinzer, G. W., and Fentiman Jr., A. F. 1968. Bark beetle attractants: trans-Verbenol isolated from Dendroctonus. Nature 218: 168-169.
44. Pureswaran, D. S., Gries, R., and Borden, J. H. 2004a. Quantitative variation in monoterpenes in four species of conifers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 32: 1109-1136.
45. Pureswaran, D. S., Gries, R., and Borden, J. H. 2004b. Antennal responses of four species of tree-killing bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolitidae) to volatiles collected from beetles, and their host and nonhost conifers. Chemoecology 14: 59-66.
46. R Development Core Team 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 2. 12. 0). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www. R-project. org.
47. Raffa, K. F. and Berryman, A. A. 1982. Gustatory cues in the orientation of Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host trees. Can. Entomol. 114: 97-104.
48. Raffa, K. F. and Smalley, E. B. 1995. Interaction of pre-attack and induced monoterpene concentrations in host conifer defense against bark beetle-fungal complexes. Oecologia 102: 285-295.
49. Raffa, K. F., Aukema, B. H., Erbilgin, N., Klepzig, K. D., and Wallin, K. F. 2005. Interactions among conifer terpenoids and bark beetles across multiple levels of scale: An attempt to understand links between population patterns and physiological processes. Recent Adv. Phytochemistry 39: 79-118.
50. Reid, R. W., Whitney, H. S., and Watson, J. A. 1967. Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungi. Can. J. Bot. 45: 1115-1126.
51. Rice, A. V., Thormann, M. N., and Langor, D. W. 2007. Mountain pine beetle associated blue-stain fungi cause lesions on jack pine, lodgepole pine, and lodgepole x jack pine hybrids in Alberta. Can. J. Bot. 85: 307-315.
52. Robinson, D. A., Jones, S. B., Wraith, J. M., Or, D., and Friedman, S. P. 2003. A review of advances in dielectric and electrical conductivity measurement in soils using time domain reflectometry. Vadose Zone J. 2: 444-475.
53. Rudinsky, J. A., Morgan, M. E., Libbey, L. M., and Putnam, T. B. 1974. Antiaggregative-rivalry pheromone of the mountain pine beetle, and a new arrestant of the southern pine beetle. Environ. Entomol. 3(1): 90-98.
54. Ryker, L. C. and Libbey, L. M. 1982. Frontalin in the male mountain pine beetle. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 1399-1409.
55. Safranyik, L., Carroll, A. L., Régnière, J., Langor, D. W., Riel, W. G., Shore, T. L., Peter, B., Cooke, B. J., Nealis, V. G., and Taylor, S. W. 2010. Potential for range expansion of mountain pine beetle into the boreal forest of North America. Can. Entomol. 142: 415-442.
56. Semiz, G., Heijari, J., Isik, K., and Holopainen, J. K. 2007. Variation in needle terpenoids among Pinus sylvestris L. (Pinaceae) provenances from Turkey. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 35: 652-661.
57. Sharkey, T. D. 1991. Stomatal control of trace gas emissions, pp 335-339, in T. D. Sharkey, E. A. Holland, and H. A. Mooney (eds.), Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
58. Shrimpton, D. M. and Watson, J. A. 1971. Response of lodgepole pine seedlings to inoculation with Europhium clavigerum, a blue stain fungus. Can. J. Bot. 49: 373-375.
59. Sturgeon, K. B. 1979. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation. Evolution 33: 803-814.
60. Tardieu, F. and Simonneau, T. 1998. Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modeling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 419-432.
61. Tkacz, B. M. and Schmitz, R. F. 1986. Association of an endemic mountain pine beetle population with lodgepole pine infected by armillaria root disease in Utah. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note INT-353.
62. Turtola, S., Manninen, A.-M., Rikala, R., and Kainulainen, P. 2003. Drought stress alters the concentration of wood terpenoids in scots pine and norway spruce seedlings. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 1981-1995.
63. Vidacović, M. 1991. Conifers: Morphology and Variation. Graficki Zavod Hrvatske, Zagreb, Croatia.
64. Wallin, K. F. and Raffa, K. F. 1999. Altered constitutive and inducible phloem monoterpenes following natural defoliation of jack pine: Implications to host mediated interguild interactions and plant defense theories. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 861-880.
65. Williams, D. W. and Liebhold, A. M. 2002. Climate change and the outbreak ranges of two North American bark beetles. Agr. For. Entomol. 4: 87-99.
66. [www. for. gov. bc. ca] British Columbia. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations. http://www. for. gov. bc. ca/hfp/mountain_pine_beetle/Updated-Beetle-Facts_Mar2010. pdf.
67. Yamaoka, Y., Swanson, R. H., and Hiratsuka, Y. 1990. Inoculation of lodgepole pine with four blue-stain fungi associated with mountain pine beetle, monitored by a heat pulse velocity (HPV) instrument. Can. J. Forest Res. 20: 31-36.
68. Zavarin, E., Critchfield, W. B., and Snajberk, K. 1969. Turpentine composition of Pinus contorta×Pinus banksiana hybrids and hybrid derivatives. Can. J. Bot. 47: 1443-1453.