Ontology-based approach to context representation and reasoning for managing context-sensitive construction information

Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 331-346

  Wang, Han Hsiang ^a   Boukamp, Frank ^b   Elghamrawy, Tarek ^c  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

Construction management; Context; Knowledge management; Ontology

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; CONTEXT; CONTEXT REPRESENTATION; CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; INFORMATION-INTENSIVE INDUSTRIES; ONTOLOGY-BASED; PROJECT PARTICIPANTS; REASONING MECHANISM; RESEARCH EFFORTS; TEXTUAL DOCUMENTS;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MODELS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 80052791627     PISSN: 08873801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000094     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antoniou, G., and van Harmelen, F. (2004). A semantic web primer, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Aziz, Z., Anumba, C., and Law, K. (2006). Using context-awareness and web-services to enhance construction collaboration. Joint Int. Conf. on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3010-3019.
3. Aziz, Z., Anumba, C. J., Ruikar, D., Carrillo, P. M., and Bouchlaghem, N. M. (2005). Context aware information delivery for on-site construction operations. 22nd CIB W78 Conf. on Information Technology in Construction, Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 321-332.
4. Bechhofer, S., (2004). OWL web ontology language reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ (Sep. 1, 2009).
5. Boukamp, F. (2006). Modeling of and reasoning about construction specifications to support automated defect detection. Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh.
6. Boukamp, F., and Ergen, E. (2008). A proposed system architecture for context identification support on construction sites. 5th Int. Conf. on Innovation in Architecture, Centre for Innovative and Collaborative Construction Engineering (CICE), Loughborough, U.K.
7. Breitman, K. K., Casanova, M. A., and Truszkowski, W. (2006). Semantic web: Concepts, technologies and applications, 1st Ed., Springer, London.
8. buildingSMART. (2010). Industry foundation classes (IFC). http://www.iai-tech.org/ (Apr. 29, 2010).
9. Caldas, C. H., Soibelman, L., and Gasser, L. (2005). A methodology for the integration of project documents in model-based information systems. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 19 (1), 25-33. JCCEE5 0887-3801 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2005) 19:1(25) (Pubitemid 40479443)
10. Caldas, C. H., Soibelman, L., and Han, J. (2002). Automated classification of construction project documents. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 16 (4), 234-243. JCCEE5 0887-3801 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:4(234) (Pubitemid 40475479)
11. Chen, H., Finin, T., and Joshi, A. (2003). Using OWL in a pervasive computing broker. 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems/Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, Int. Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (IFAAMS), Richland, SC, 9-16.
12. Cimiano, P., and Vlker, J. (2005). Text2Onto: A framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
13. Darlington, M. J., and Culley, S. J. (2008). Investigating ontology development for engineering design support. Adv. Eng. Inform., 22 (1), 112-134. 1474-0346 10.1016/j.aei.2007.04.001 (Pubitemid 351273673)
14. Dey, A. K., and Abowd, G. D. (2000). Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. Proc. of the CHI 2000 Workshop on The What, Who, Where, and How of Context-Awareness, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
15. Dolenc, M., Katranuschkov, P., Gehre, A., Kurowski, K., and Turk,. (2007). The InteliGrid platform for virtual organisations interoperability. ITCon 1874-4753, 12, 459-477. (Pubitemid 350074536)
16. El-Diraby, T. E., Lima, C., and Feis, B. (2005). Domain taxonomy for construction concepts: Toward a formal ontology for construction knowledge. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 19 (4), 394-406. JCCEE5 0887-3801 10.1061/(ASCE)0887- 3801(2005)19:4(394) (Pubitemid 41441370)
17. El-Diraby, T. E., and Zhang, J. (2006). A semantic framework to support corporate memory management in building construction. Autom. Constr., 15 (4), 504-521. AUCOES 0926-5805 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.07.005 (Pubitemid 43817510)
18. Elghamrawy, T., and Boukamp, F. (2008). A vision for a framework to support management of and learning from construction problems. Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
19. Feruzan, A. (2007). Context modeling and reasoning using ontologies. http://www.aywa.de/cmaruo/cmaruo.pdf Univ. of Technology Berlin (Apr. 24, 2008).
20. Furnas, G. W., (2006). Why do tagging systems work?. Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Special Interest Group on Computer Human Interaction (SIGCHI), New York, 36-39.
21. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. KNACE9 1042-8143, 5 (2), 199-220. 10.1006/knac.1993.1008
22. Haimes, B. (1994). Document interface. Interactions, 1 (4), 15-18. IERAE3 1072-5520 10.1145/194283.194296
23. Kartam, N. A. (1996). Making effective use of construction lessons learned in project life cycle. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 122 (1), 14-21. JCEMD4 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(14) (Pubitemid 126574593)
24. Kiliccote, H. (1994). The context-oriented model: A hybrid approach to modeling and processing design standards. M.S. thesis, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh.
25. Kim, E., and Choi, J. (2006). An ontology-based context model in a smart home. Proc. of the 2006 Int. Conf. on Computational Science and Its Applications, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 11-20. (Pubitemid 44045052)
26. Korpip, P., Hkkil, J., Kela, J., Ronkainen, S., and Knsl, I. (2004). Utilising context ontology in mobile device application personalisation. Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York, 133-140.
27. Lai, Y.-C. (2006). IT-CODE: IT in collaborative design. Ph.D. thesis, Aalborg Univ., Aalborg, Denmark.
28. Lima, C., El-Diraby, T. E., and Stephens, J. (2005). Ontology-based optimisation of knowledge management in e-construction. ITcon 1874-4753, 10, 305-327. (Pubitemid 41657894)
29. TerMine [Computer software]. National Centre for Text Mining, Manchester, U.K.
30. OCCS. (2010). Omniclass: A strategy for classifying the built environment. http://www.omniclass.org/ (Apr. 29, 2010).
31. Rezgui, Y. (2006). Ontology-centered knowledge management using information retrieval techniques. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 20 (4), 261-270. JCCEE5 0887-3801 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2006)20:4(261) (Pubitemid 43925188)
32. Russell, A. D. (1993). Computerized daily site reporting. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 119 (2), 385-402. JCEMD4 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119: 2(385)
33. Scherer, R. J., and Reul, S. (2000). Retrieval of project knowledge from heterogeneous AEC documents. Proc. of the Eighth Int. Conf. on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, ASCE, Reston VA, 812-819. (Pubitemid 35213267)
34. Soibelman, L., and Caldas, C. H. (2006). A combined text mining method to improve document management in construction projects. Joint Int. Conf. on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2912-2918.
35. Soibelman, L., Wu, J., Caldas, C., Brilakis, I., and Lin, K.-Y. (2008). Management and analysis of unstructured construction data types. Adv. Eng. Inform. 1474-0346, 22 (1), 15-27. 10.1016/j.aei.2007.08.011 (Pubitemid 351273678)
36. Srensen, K. B., Christiansson, P., and Svidt, K. (2010). Ontologies to support RFID-based link between virtual models and construction components. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 25 (4), 285-302. 1093-9687 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00638.x
37. Souza, D., Salgado, A. C., and Tedesco, P. (2006). Towards a context ontology for geospatial data integration. Proc. of On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: OTM 2006 Workshops, Springer, Washington, DC, 1576-1585. (Pubitemid 44891720)
38. U.S. Dept. of Labor. (2002). Job hazard analysis: OSHA publication 3071, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Washington, DC.
39. W3C. (2004). OWL: Web Ontology Language. http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/ (Dec. 11, 2008).
40. Wang, H.-H., and Boukamp, F. (2007). Leveraging project models for automated identification of construction safety requirements. Proc. of the 2007 ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 240-247.
41. Wang, H.-H., and Boukamp, F. (2008). A context ontology development process for construction safety. Joint CIB Conf.: W102 Information and Knowledge Management in Building and W096 Architectural Management, Int. Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction (CIB), Rotterdam, Netherlands, 297-308.
42. Wang, H.-H., and Boukamp, F. (2009). Ontology-based job hazard analysis support. Proc. of the 2009 ASCE Int. Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Reston, VA, 676-685.
43. Wang, X. H., Zhang, D. Q., and Gu, T. (2004). Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. Second IEEE Annual Conf. on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
44. Zhu, Y., Mao, W., and Ahmad, I. (2007). Capturing implicit structures in unstructured content of construction documents. J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 21 (3), 220-227. JCCEE5 0887-3801 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2007)21:3(220) (Pubitemid 46610049)