Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography practice in district general hospitals in North East England: A Northern Regional Endoscopy Group (NREG) study

Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 109-113

  Chatterjee, S ^a   Rees, C ^b   Dwarakanath, A D ^c   Barton, R ^d   MacDonald, C ^e   Greenaway, J ^f   Gregory, W ^d   Reddy, A ^g   Nylander, D L ^a  

^a SUNDERLAND ROYAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTH TYNESIDE DISTRICT HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH TEES   (United Kingdom)

^d NORTHUMBRIA HEALTHCARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^e CUMBERLAND INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^f JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography; North East England

Indexed keywords

DIAZEPAM; FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PETHIDINE;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHOLANGITIS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GENERAL HOSPITAL; MORTALITY; PANCREATITIS; PERFORATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; ENGLAND; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HOSPITALS, DISTRICT; HOSPITALS, GENERAL; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DUCTS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 80052775759     PISSN: 14782715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4997/JRCPE.2011.221     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007; 56:821-9. doi:10.1136/gut.2006.097543
2. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD). Scoping our practice; the 2004 Report of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. London: NCEPOD; 2004. Available from http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2004.htm
3. Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) Guidelines on the training, appraisal and assessment of trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy, London; JAG; 2004. Available from http://www.bsg.org.uk/pdf_word_docs/jag_recommendations_2004.pdf
4. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49:845-53. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70316-0
5. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56(Suppl): S273-82. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70025-4
6. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:909-18. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609263351301
7. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Beneditti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastointest Endosc 1998; 48:1-10. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(98)70121-X
8. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54:425-34. doi:10.1067/mge.2001.117550
9. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:417-23. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03594.x
10. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S et al. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60:721-731. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(04)02169-8
11. British Society of Gastroenterology. Safety and sedation during endoscopic procedures. London: BSG, 2003. Available from http://www.bsg.org.uk/clinical-guidelines/endoscopy/guidelines-onsafety-and-sedation-during-endoscopic-procedures.html