Quasi-static behavior identification of polyurethane foam using a memory integer model and the difference-forces method

Journal of Cellular Plastics

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 447-465

  Jmal, H ^a   Dupuis, R ^a   Aubry, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE HAUTE ALSACE   (France)

Author keywords

flexible polyurethane foam; identification parameters; linear viscoelasticity; memory integer model; quasi static behavior; thermodynamic conditions of model

Indexed keywords

FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANES; IDENTIFICATION PARAMETERS; LINEAR VISCOELASTICITY; MEMORY INTEGER MODEL; QUASI-STATIC; THERMODYNAMIC CONDITIONS OF MODEL;

COMPRESSION TESTING; ELASTICITY; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY;

RIGID FOAMED PLASTICS;

EID: 80052766487     PISSN: 0021955X     EISSN: 15307999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0021955X11406101     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gibson LJ and Ashby MF Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2 nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
2. American Society for Testing Material. Plastics (II): ASTM D3574-05 standard test methods for flexible cellular materials and molded urethane foams. Philadelphia: ASTM, 2010.
3. Goangseup Zi, Byeong MK, Yoon KH and Young HL An experimental study on static behaviour of a GFRP bridge deck filled with a polyurethane foam. Compos Struct 2008 ; 82 (2). 257-268. (Pubitemid 47430484)
4. Tu ZH, Shim VPW and Lim CT Plastic deformation modes in rigid polyurethane foam under static loading. Int J Solids Struct 2001 ; 38 (50-51). 9267-9279. (Pubitemid 33112416)
5. Deng R., Davies P. and Bajaj AK A nonlinear fractional derivative model for large uni-axial deformation behaviour of polyurethane foam. Signal Process 2006 ; 86 (10). 2728-2743.
6. Dupuis LR and Aubry E. Development and comparison of foam comprehensive law in great deformation. In: SEM XI International Congerss, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2008.
7. Njeugna N., Schacher L., Adolphe CD, Dupuis LR and Aubry E. Comparison of compression behaviour of PU foam and 3D nonwoven. In: Fiber Society 2008 Fall Annual Meeting and Technical Conference, Boucherville, Canada, 2008.
8. Ouellet S., Cronin D. and Worswick M. Compressive response of polymeric foams under quasi-static, medium and high strain rate conditions. Polym Test 2006 ; 25 (6). 731-743. (Pubitemid 44278238)
9. Ippili RK, Davies P., Bajaj AK and Hagenmeyer L. Nonlinear multi-body dynamic modelling of seat-occupant system with polyurethane seat and H-point prediction. Int J Ind Ergon 2008 ; 38 (5-6). 368-383. (Pubitemid 351608435)
10. Deng R. Modeling and characterization of flexible polyurethane foam. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, Indiana, USA, 2004.
11. Singh R., Davies P. and Bajaj AK Initial condition response of a viscoelastic dynamical system in the presence of dry friction and identification of system parameters. J Sound Vib 2001 ; 239 (5). 1086-1095. (Pubitemid 32370243)
12. Singh R., Davies P. and Bajaj AK Estimation of the dynamical properties of polyurethane foam through use of Prony series. J Sound Vib 2003 ; 264 (5). 1005-1043.
13. Singh R., Davies P. and Bajaj AK Identification of nonlinear and viscoelastic properties of flexible polyurethane foam. Nonlinear Dyn 2003 ; 34 (3). 319-346.
14. White SW Dynamic modelling and mesurement of occupied car seats and seating foam. PhD Thesis, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, Indiana, USA, 1998.
15. Bezazi A. and Scarpa F. Tensile fatigue of conventional and negative Poisson's ratio open cell PU foams. Int J Fatigue 2009 ; 31 (3). 488-494.
16. Rizov V. and Mladensky A. ModeI fatigue fracture behaviour of Divinucell H-30 structural foam - A non-linear approach. Comput Mater Sci 2009 ; 46 (1). 255-260.
17. Warren WE and Kraynik AM The linear elastic propreties of open-cell foams. J Appl Mech 1988 ; 55: 341-346. (Pubitemid 18646474)
18. Warren WE and Kraynik AM The nonlinear elastic behaviour of open-cell foam. J Appl Mech 1991 ; 58: 376-381. (Pubitemid 21699952)
19. Song Y., Wang Z., Zhao L. and Luo J. Dynamic crushing behaviour of 3D closed-cell foams based on Voronoi random model. Mater Des 2010 ; 31 (9). 4281-4289.
20. Zhu HX, Thorpe SM and Windle AH The effect of cell irregularity on the high strain compression of 2D Voronoi honeycombs. Int J Solids Struct 2006 ; 43 (5). 1061-1078. (Pubitemid 41828244)
21. Yeoh OH Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rubber Chem Technol 1993 ; 66: 754-771.
22. Arruda EM and Boyce MC A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behaviour of rubber elastic materials. J Mech Phys Solids 1993 ; 41 (2). 389-412.
23. Treloar LRG. The physics of rubber elasticity. 3 rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
24. Storåkers B. On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 1986 ; 34 (2). 125-145. (Pubitemid 16507202)
25. Ogden RW Large deformation istropic elasticity: on the correlation of theory and experiment for compressible rubber like solids. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A, Math Phys Sci 1972 ; 328 (1575). 567-583.