System-level model integration of design and simulation for mechatronic systems based on SysML

Mechatronics

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1063-1075

  Cao, Yue ^a   Liu, Yusheng ^a,b   Paredis, Christiaan J J ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Model transformation; Model based systems engineering; Simscape; Simulation; Simulink; SysML; System dynamics

Indexed keywords

FORMAL LANGUAGES; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

MODEL TRANSFORMATION; MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING; SIMSCAPE; SIMULATION; SIMULINK; SYSML; SYSTEM DYNAMICS;

MODELING LANGUAGES;

EID: 80052766346     PISSN: 09574158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Kevin Craig. Mechatronics system design. Motor, drive, & automation systems conference; 2009.
2. Z.H. Jue Coupling design theory and method of complex electromechanical system 2007 China Machine Press
3. Michelle B, David H. System design: new product development for mechatronics. Aberdeen Group. Benchmark report; 2008. p. 1.
4. J. Fisher Model-based systems engineering: a new paradigm INCOSE Insight 1 3 1998 3 16
5. Object Management Group (OMG). Systems modeling language specification; 2009. < http://www.omg.org/spec/SysML/1.2/PDF >.
6. MathWorks Inc. Stateflow® and Stateflow® Coder™ 7 User's Guide; 2009. < http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf-doc/ stateflow/sf-ug.pdf >.
7. MathWorks Inc., Simscape 3.2; 2009. < http://www.mathworks.com/ products/simscape >.
8. K. Berkenkötter, S. Bisanz, U. Hannemann, and J. Peleska HybridUML Profile for UML 2. 0 Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 8 2 2006 167 176
9. R. Alur, C. Courcoubetis, N. Halbwachs, T.A. Henzinger, P. Ho, and X. Nicollin The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems Theor Comput Sci 138 1995 3 34
10. R. Alur, T. Dang, J. Esposito, Y. Hur, F. Ivan, and V. Kumar Hierarchical modeling and analysis of embedded systems Proc IEEE 91 1 2003 11 28
11. Vanderperren Y, Dehaene W. From UML/SysML to Matlab/Simulink: current state and future perspectives. In: Proceedings of design, automation and test in Europe (DATE). Munich, Germany, March 6-10; 2006.
12. Turki S, Soriano T. A SysML extension for bond graphs support. In: 5th International conference on technology and automation. Thessaloniki, Greece, October 15-16; 2005.
13. Pop A, Akhvlediani D, Fritzson P. Towards unified systems modeling with the ModelicaML UML profile. International workshop on equation-based object-oriented languages and tools. Berlin, Germany: Linköping University Electronic Press; 2007.
14. Modelica Association. Modelica Language Specification; 2009. < http://www.modelica.org/documents/ModelicaSpec31.pdf >.
15. Nytsch-Geusen C. The use of UML within the modelling process of Modelica-models. In: International workshop on equation-based object-oriented languages and tools. Berlin, Germany: Linköping University Electronic Press; 2007.
16. Johnson TA, Paredis CJJ, Burkhart R, Jobe JM. Modeling continuous system dynamics in SysML. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. Seattle, WA: ASME; 2007.
17. Johnson TA, Paredis CJJ, Burkhart R. Integrating models and simulations of continuous dynamics into Sysml. In: Modelica conference. Bielefeld, Germany; 2008.
18. Varró, D. VIATRA: visual automated model transformation. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Measurement and Information Systems, University of Technology and Economics, Budapest; 2003.
19. SysML-Modelica integration working group. SysML Modelica transformation specification version 1.0; 2010. < http://www.omgwiki.org/OMGSysML/doku.php? id=sysml-modelica:sysml-and-modelica-integration >.
20. Fierro R, Hur Y, Lee I, Sha L. Modeling the simplex architecture using CHARON. In: Proceedings 21st IEEE real-time systems symposium; 2000.
21. MathWorks Inc. Simscape™ 3 User's Guide; 2009. < http://www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf-doc/physod/simscape/ simscape-ug.pdf >.
22. Schürr A. Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Proceedings of WG'94 workshop on graph-theoretic concepts in computer science; 1994. p. 151-63.
23. Object Management Group. MOF QVT Final Adopted Specification; 2005. < http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2005-11-01 >.
24. Königs A. Model integration and transformation - a triple graph grammar-based QVT implementation. Ph.D. thesis, Real-Time Systems Lab., Darmstadt University of Technology, Germany; 2008.
25. Amelunxen C, Klar F, Königs A, et al. Metamodel-based tool integration with MOFLON. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on software engineering. New York: ACM Press; 2005. p. 807-810.
26. Klar F, Rose S, Schürr A. TiE - a tool integration environment. In: Proceedings of the 5th ECMDA traceability workshop, vol. WP09-09; 2009. p. 39-48.
27. K. Czarnecki, and S. Helsen Feature-based survey of model transformation approaches IBM Syst J 45 3 2006 621 645 (Pubitemid 44323030)
28. Object Management Group. Meta Object Facility (MOF) Core Specification; 2006. < http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.0/PDF >.
29. Fujaba Core Development Group. Fujaba Tool Suite, < http://www.fujaba.de >.