Monitoring Urban Sprawl and the National Ecological Reserve in Sintra-Cascais, Portugal: Multiple OLS Linear Regression Model Evaluation

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 346-353

  Cabral, Pedro ^a   Santos, José A ^a   Augusto, Gabriela ^a  

^a NOVA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SCHOOL NOVA IMS   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Environmental monitoring; Landscape metrics; Multiple OLS linear regression; Urban growth

Indexed keywords

CHANGE ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; ECOLOGICAL RESERVES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LANDSAT SATELLITE; LANDSCAPE CHANGES; LANDSCAPE METRICS; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES; LINEAR REGRESSION MODELS; MULTIPLE OLS LINEAR REGRESSION; ORDINARY LEAST SQUARES; PORTUGAL; REGRESSION MODELING; SIMPLE METHOD; STUDY AREAS; URBAN AREAS; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN SPRAWL; VULNERABLE AREA;

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; GEOLOGIC MODELS;

LINEAR REGRESSION;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LANDSAT; LANDSCAPE CHANGE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE DATA; URBAN AREA; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBANIZATION;

CASCAIS; LISBOA [PORTUGAL]; PORTUGAL;

EID: 80052765577     PISSN: 07339488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000059     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alberti M. Waddel P. An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. Integr. Assess. 2000, 1(3):215-227. 1389-5176, 10.1023/A:1019140101212, and.
2. Anderson J.R. Hardy E.E. Roach J.T. Witmer R.E. land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. 1976, and U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964, United States Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
3. Brun S. Brand L. Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2000, 24(1):5-22. CEUSD5, 10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00040-X, and.
4. Burton M. Samuelson L. Mackenzie M. Riparian woody plant traits across an urban-rural land use gradient and implications for watershed function with urbanization. Landscape Urban Plann. 2008, 90(1-2):42-55. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, /10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.005, and.
5. Cabral P. Délimitation d'aires urbaines á partir d'une image Landsat ETM+: Comparaison de méthodes de classification. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 33(5):422-430. CJRSDP, 0703-8992, 10.5589/m07-039, (in French).
6. Collinge S. Ecological consequences of habitat fragmentation: Implications for landscape architecture and planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 1996, 36(1):59-77. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6.
7. Cushman S.A. McGarigal K. Neel M.C. Parsimony in landscape metrics: Strength, universality, and consistency. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8(5):691-703. EICNBG, 1470-160X, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.12.002, and.
8. DiBari J. Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: The case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landscape Urban Plann. 2007, 79(3-4):308-313. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.04.004.
9. Draper N. Smith H. Applied regression analysis 1998, and Wiley-Interscience, New York.
10. Forman R. Godron M. Landscape ecology 1996, and Wiley, New York.
11. Gustafson E. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art?. Ecosystems 1998, 1(2):143-156. ECOSFJ, 1432-9840, 10.1007/s100219900011.
12. Hahs A.K. McDonnell M.J. Selecting independent measures to quantify Melbourne's urban-rural gradient. Landscape Urban Plann. 2006, 78(4):435-448. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.005, and.
13. Haralick M. Shanmugan K. Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part Cybern. 1973, 3(6):610-621. 1083-4419, 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314, and.
14. Herold M. Goldstein N. Clarke K. The spatio-temporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86(3):95-105. RSEEA7, 0034-4257, 10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0, and.
15. 2001, Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE), Censos 2001-Resultados preliminares, Lisboa, Portugal (in Portuguese).
16. Jensen J.R. Introductory digital image processing: remote sensing perspective 1996, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
17. Johnston J. Econometric methods 1984, McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. Lausch A. Herzog F. Applicability of landscape metrics for the monitoring of landscape change: Issues of scale, resolution and interpretability. Ecol. Indic. 2002, 2(1-2):3-15. EICNBG, 1470-160X, 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00053-5, and.
19. Leitão A.B. Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 2002, 59(2):65-93. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00005-1, and.
20. Levin T. Powell T. Steele J. Patch dynamics 1993, and Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
21. Liding C. Yang L. Yihea L. Xiaominga F. Bojie F. Pattern analysis in landscape ecology: Progress, challenges and outlook. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2008, 28(11):5521-5531. 1872-2032, 10.1016/S1872-2032(09)60011-1, and.
22. Luck M. Wu J. gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern: case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region, Arizona, USA. Landscape ecology 2002, 17(4):327-339. LAECEH, 0921-2973, 10.1023/A:1020512723753, and.
23. McGarigal K. Marks B. Holmes C. Ene E. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps 2002, and Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
24. Meffe G. Carroll C. Principles of conservation biology 1997, and Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
25. Naveh Z. Lieberman A. Landscape ecology: Theory and application 1999, and Springer-Verlag, New York.
26. O'Neill R. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecol. 1988, 1(3):153-162. LAECEH, 0921-2973, 10.1007/BF00162741.
27. Parker D. Berger T. Manson S. Agent-based models of land-use and land-cover change. 2001, and LUCC Rep. Series No. 6, Land Use and Cover Change International Project Office, Irvine, CA.
28. Pickett S. White S. The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics 1985, and Academic Press, Inc., San Diego.
29. Rawashdeh S.A. Saleh B. Satellite monitoring of urban spatial growth in the Amman area, Jordan. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2006, 132(4):211-216. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:4(211), and.
30. Rizwan A. Dennis L. Liu C. review on the generation, determination and mitigation of urban heat island. J. Environ. Sci. (China) 2008, 20(1):120-128. JENSEE, 1001-0742, 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)60019-4, and.
31. Rosenfield G. Fitzpatrick-Lins K. coefficient of agreement as measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1986, 52(2):223-227. PERSDV, 0099-1112, and.
32. Scalenghe R. Ajmone-Marsan F. The anthropogenic sealing of soils in urban areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 2009, 90(1-2):1-10. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.10.011, and.
33. Silva E. Beyond modeling in environmental and urban planning. Planning support systems and the case study of Lisbon and Porto Metropolitan Areas, Portugal 2002, Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
34. Tamnhane A. Dunlop D. Statistics and data analysis: From elementary to intermediate 2000, and Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
35. Tavernia B.G. Reed J.M. Spatial extent and habitat context influence the nature and strength of relationships between urbanization measures. Landscape Urban Plann. 2009, 92(1):47-52. LUPLEZ, 0169-2046, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.02.003, and.
36. Turner M. Carpenter S. At last: journal devoted to ecosystems. Ecosystems 1998, 1(1):1-5. ECOSFJ, 1432-9840, 10.1007/s100219900001, and.
37. Turner M. Gardner R. Quantitive methods in landscape ecology: An introduction 1991, and Springer-Verlag, New York.
38. Cultural landscape of Sintra. 2005, UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization World Heritage Convention, (Aug. 13, 2005).
39. Wilson J. Lindsey G.H. Socioeconomic correlates and environmental impacts of urban development in central Indiana landscape. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2005, 131(3):159-169. JUPDDM, 0733-9488, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:3(159), and.