Giants and dwarfs: Molecular phylogenies reveal multiple origins of annual spurges within Euphorbia subg. Esula

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 413-424

  Frajman, Božo ^a   Schönswetter, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Character state reconstruction; Parsimony; Phylogeny; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; CONTIG MAPPING; DNA SEQUENCE; EUPHORBIA; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; PLASTID;

BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CONTIG MAPPING; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; EUPHORBIA; PHYLOGENY; PLASTIDS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EUPHORBIA; EUPHORBIACEAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 80052762877     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Albach D.C., Martínez-Ortega M.M., Chase M.W. Veronica: parallel morphological evolution and phylogeography in the Mediterranean. Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246:177-194.
2. Altekar G., Dwarkadas S., Huelsenbeck J.P., Ronquist F. Parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:407-415.
3. Álvarez I., Wendel J.F. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2003, 29:417-434.
4. Andreasen K., Baldwin B.G. Unequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae): evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2001, 18:936-944.
5. Benedí C., Molero J., Simon J., Vicens J. Euphorbia L. Flora Iberica VIII 1997, 210-297. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid. S. Castroviejo, C. Aedo, C. Benedí, M. Laínz, F. Muñoz Garmendia, G. Nieto Feliner, J. Paiva (Eds.).
6. Bennett, M.D., Leitch, I. J. (Eds.), 2010. Plant DNA C-Values Database (Release 7.0, December 2010). http://data.kew.org/cvalues/.
7. Boissier P.E. Subordo 1. Euphorbieae. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 15 1862, 3-188. Victoris Masson et filii, Parisiis. A. De Candolle (Ed.).
8. Bruyns P.V., Mapaya R.J., Hedderson T. A new subgeneric classification for Euphorbia (Euphorbiaceae) in southern Africa based on ITS and psbA-trnH sequence data. Taxon 2006, 55:397-420.
9. Bryant D., Moulton V. Neighbor-net: an agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21:255-265.
10. Chang J.T. Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters. Math. Biosci. 1996, 134:189-215.
11. Chrtek J., Křísa B. Tithymalus Gaertner-pryšec. Květena České Republiky 3 1992, 321-346. Academia, Praha. S. Hejný, B. Slavík (Eds.).
12. Corriveau J.L., Coleman A.W. Rapid screening method to detect potential biparental inheritance of plastid DNA and result for over 200 angiosperm species. Am. J. Bot. 1988, 75:1443-1458.
13. Escobar García P., Schönswetter P., Fuertes Aguilar J., Nieto Feliner G., Schneeweiss G.M. Five molecular markers reveal extensive morphological homoplasy and reticulate evolution in the Malva alliance (Malvaceae). Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 2009, 50:226-239.
14. Chromosome Numbers of Flowering Plants 1969, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Leningrad. A.A. Fedorov (Ed.).
15. Fischer M.A., Oswald K., Adler W. Exkursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol. 3. Auflage. Biologiezentrum der Oberösterreichischen Landesmuseen 2008, Linz.
16. Frajman B., Jogan N. Mlečki (rod Euphorbia) Slovenije [The genus Euphorbia in Slovenia]. Scopolia 2007, 62:1-68.
17. Frajman B., Eggens F., Oxelman B. Hybrid origins and homoploid reticulate evolution within Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) - A multigene phylogenetic approach with relative dating. Syst. Biol. 2009, 58:328-345.
18. Geltman D.V. Konspekt sistemy podroda Esula Pers. roda Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) vnetropičeskoj Evrazii. [Conspectus systematis subgeneris Esula Pers. generis Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) Eurasiae extratropicae.] Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast 2007, 39:224-240.
19. Goldblatt, P., Johnson, D.E. (Eds.), 1979- Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis.
20. Hans A.S. Chromosomal conspectus of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon 1973, 22:591-636.
21. Hegi G., Beger H. Euphorbiaceae. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa V/1 1924, 113-188. Lehmanns Verlag, München. G. Hegi (Ed.).
22. Heubl G.R., Wanner G. Samenmorphologische Studien in der Gattung Euphorbia L. Ber. Bayer. Bot. Ges. 1996, 66(67):7-25.
23. Huelsenbeck J.P., Rasmus N., Bollback J.P. Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 2003, 52:131-158.
24. Huson D.H. SplitsTree: a program for analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:68-73.
25. Huson D.H., Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2006, 23:254-267.
26. Huson, D.H., Bryant, D., 2008. User Manual for SplitsTree4 V4.10. http://www.splitstree.org.
27. Liston A., Wheeler J.A. The phylogenetic position of the genus Astragalus (Fabaceae): evidence from the chloroplast gene rpoC1 and rpoC2. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1994, 22:377-388.
28. Mabberley D.J. Mabberley's Plant-book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Maddison, W.P., Maddison, D.R., 2010. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis. Version 2.73. http://mesquiteproject.org.
30. Molero J., Garnatje T., Rovira A., Garcia-Jacas N., Susanna A. Karyological evolution and molecular phylogeny in Macaronesian dendroid spurges (Euphorbia subsect. Pachycladae). Plant Syst. Evol. 2002, 231:109-132.
31. Index to Plant Chromosome Numbers 1967-1971 1973, IAPT, Utrecht. R.J. Moore (Ed.).
32. Müller K., Albach D.C. Evolutionary rates in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae): disentengling the influence of life history and breeding system. J. Mol. Evol. 2010, 70:44-56.
33. Müller K., Müller J. QuickAlign: a new alignment editor. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2003, 21:5.
34. Norton J.B.S. A revision of the American species of Euphorbia of the section Tithymalus occuring north of Mexico. Missouri Bot. Gard. Ann. Rep. 1900, 1900:85-144.
35. Nylander J.A.A. MrAIC.pl. Program Distributed by the Author 2004, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
36. Park K.-R., Jansen R.K. A phylogeny of Euphorbieae subtribe Euphorbiinae (Euphorbiaceae) based on molecular data. J. Plant Biol. 2007, 50:644-649.
37. Prokhanov Y.I. Genus 856. Euphorbia L. Flora SSSR 1949, 233-378. Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva-Leningrad. B.K. Shishkin, E.G. Bobrov (Eds.).
38. Radcliffe-Smith A. Euphorbia L. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 1982, vol. 7:571-630. University Press, Edinburgh.
39. Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1572-1574.
40. Ruano-Rubio V., Fares M.A. Artifactual phylogenies caused by correlated distribution of substitution rates among sites and lineages: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Syst. Biol. 2007, 56:68-82.
41. Schäffer S., Koblmüller S., Pfingstl T., Sturmbauer C., Krisper G. Ancestral state reconstruction reveals multiple independent evolution of diagnostic morphological characters in the " Higher Oribatida" (Acari), conflicting with current classification schemes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010, 10:246.
42. Schönswetter P., Schneeweiss G.M. Androsace komovensis sp. nov., a long mistaken local endemic from the southern Balkan Peninsula with biogeographic links to the Eastern Alps. Taxon 2009, 58:544-549.
43. Scopoli I.A. Flora Carniolica 1 1772, Impensis Ioannis Pavli Kravss, Bibliopolae Vindobonensis.
44. Slowinski J., Page R.D.M. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data?. Syst. Biol. 1999, 48:814-825.
45. Smith S.A., Donoghue M.J. Rates of molecular evolution are linked to life history in flowering plants. Science 2008, 322:86-89.
46. Smith A.R., Tutin T.G. Euphorbia L. Flora Europaea 2 1968, 213-226. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. T.G. Tutin, V.H. Heywood, D.M. Moore, D.H. Valentine, S.M. Walters, D.A. Webb (Eds.).
47. Staden R., Beal K.F., Bonfield J.K. The Staden package. Computer Methods in Molecular Biology 1998, vol. 132:115-130. The Humana Press Inc., Totowa.
48. Stebbins G.L. Self fertilization and population variability in the higher plants. Am. Nat. 1957, 91:337-354.
49. Steinmann V.W., Porter J.M. Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 2002, 89:453-490.
50. Swofford D.L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Ver. 4.0 Beta 10 2002, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
51. Taberlet P., Gielly L., Pautou G., Bouvet J. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding chloroplast regions. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 17:1105-1109.
52. Tank D.C., Olmstead R.G. From annuals to perennials: phylogeny of subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae). Am. J. Bot. 2008, 95:608-625.
53. Tel-Zur N., Abbo S., Myslabodsky D., Mizrahi Y. Modified CTAB procedure for DNA isolation from epiphytic cacti of the genera Hylocereus and Selenicereus (Cactaceae). Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1999, 17:249-254.
54. Trinajstić I. Nomenklaturno-taksonomska i korološka razmatranja o vrsti Euphorbia herzegovina G. Beck [Nomenclatural, taxonomic and chorological considerations about the species Euphorbia herzegovina G. Beck]. Hrvatska Misao 2007, 11:82-88.
55. Turner R. Euphorbias, A Gardeners' Guide 1998, B.T. Batsford, London.
56. Urbatsch L.E., Bacon J.D., Hartman R.L., Johnston M.C., Watson T.J., Webster G.L. Chromosome numbers for North American Euphorbiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 1975, 62:494-500.
57. Wendel J.F., Doyle J.J. Phylogenetic incongruence. Window into genome history and molecular evolution. Molecular Systematics of Plants II 1998, 265-296. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht. P. Soltis, D. Soltis, J. Doyle (Eds.).
58. Wheeler L.C. The genera of living Euphorbieae. Am. Mid. Nat. 1943, 30:456-503.
59. Wurdack K.J., Hoffmann P., Chase M.W. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Am. J. Bot. 2005, 92:1397-1420.
60. Zhang Q., Liu Y., Sodmergen Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Pl. Cell Physiol. 2003, 44:941-951.
61. Zimmermann N.F.A., Ritz C.M., Hellwig F.H. Further support for the phylogenetic relationships within Euphorbia L. (Euphorbiaceae) from nrITS and trnL-trnF IGS sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 2010, 286:39-58.