Measuring the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming

Proceedings of the 12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, IM 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 485-492

  Mok, Ricky K P ^a   Chan, Edmond W W ^a   Chang, Rocky K C ^a  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODEL; APPLICATION QOS; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; NETWORK IMPAIRMENTS; NETWORK QOS; QUALITY DEGRADATION; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCES; SOUND QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIMENTS; TEMPORAL STRUCTURES;

ACOUSTIC STREAMING; HTTP; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NETWORK MANAGEMENT; VIDEO STREAMING; VIDEOTEX;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 80052760423     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INM.2011.5990550     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. The Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG). http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg.
2. Youtube video speed history, http://www.youtube.com/my-speed.
3. I. Abdeljaouad, H. Rachidi, S. Fernandes, and A. Karmouch. Performance analysis of modern TCP variants: A comparison of Cubic, Compound and New Reno. In Proc. QBSC, 2010.
4. Adobe. Video technology center, delivery: Progressive download, http://www.adobe.com/devnet/video/progressive.html.
5. S. Avallone, S. Guadagno, D. Emma, A. Pescape, and G. Ventre. D-itg distributed internet traffic generator. In Proc. QEST, 2004.
6. H. Balakrishnan, V. Padmanabhan, G. Fairhurst, and M. Sooriyabandara. TCP performance implications of network path asymmetry, 2002.
7. J. Case, M. Fedor, M. Schoffstall, and J. Davin. Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). RFC 1157, IETF, May 1990.
8. Y. Chang, C. Chang, K. Chen, and C. Lei. Radar chart: Scanning for high QoE in QoS dimensions. In Proc. IEEE CQR, June 2010.
9. B. Choi, S. Moon, R. Cruz, Z. Zhang, and C. Diot. Practical delay monitoring for ISPs. In Proc. ACM CoNEXT, 2005.
10. S. Ha, I. Rhee, and L. Xu. CUBIC: A new TCP-friendly high-speed TCP variant. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 42(5):64-74, 2008.
11. D. Hands and M. Wilkins. A study of the impact of network loss and burst size on video streaming quality and acceptability. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 45-57, 1999.
12. Q. Huynh-Thu and M. Ghanbari. Temporal aspect of perceived quality in mobile video broadcasting. IEEE Trans, on Broadcasting, 54(3):641 - 651, 2008.
13. Q. Huynh-Thu and M. Ghanbari. No-reference temporal quality metric for video impaired by frame freezing artefacts. In Proc. ICIP, 2009.
14. ITU-T Recommendation P. 800. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality, August 1996.
15. ITU-T Recommendation P.911. Subjective audiovisual quality assessment methods for multimedia applications, December 1998.
16. R. Karki, T. Seenivasan, M. Claypool, and R. Kinicki. Performance analysis of home streaming video using Orb. In Proc. NOSSDAV, 2010.
17. T. Kim and M. Ammar. Receiver buffer requirement for video streaming over TCP. In Proc. SPIE, pages p. 422-431, 2006.
18. E. Kohler, R. Morris, B. Chen, J. Jannotti, and M. F. Kaashoek. The click modular router. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 18(3):263-297, 2000.
19. X. Luo, E. Chan, and R. Chang. Design and implementation of TCP data probes for reliable and metric-rich network path monitoring. In Proc. USENIX Annual Tech. Conf. 2009, 2009.
20. Nielsen. YouTube maintains top ranking by total streams and Hulu grows 490 percent year-over-year, April 2009. http://en-us.nielsen.com/main/news/news- releases/2009/may/youtube-maintains.
21. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP Reno performance: A simple model and its empirical validation. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 8(2):133-145, 2000.
22. K. Tan and J. Song. Compound TCP: A Scalable and TCP-friendly Congestion Control for High-speed Networks. In Proc. PFLDNet, 2006.
23. S. Tasaka and Y. Ishibashi. Mutually compensatory property of multimedia QoS. In Proc. ICC, 2002.
24. S. Tasaka and Y Watanabe. Real-time estimation of user-level QoS in audio-video IP transmission by using temporal and spatial quality. In Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, 2007.
25. P. Varga, G. Kún, G. Sey, I. Moldován, and P. Gelencsér. Correlating user perception and measurable network properties: Experimenting with QoE. Autonomic Principles of IP Operations and Management, pages 218-221, 2006.
26. O. Verscheure, P. Frossard, and M. Hamdi. MPEG-2 video services over packet networks: Joint effect of encoding rate. In Proc. NOSSDAV, 1998.
27. B. Wang, J. Kurose, P. Shenoy, and D. Towsley. Multimedia streaming via TCP: An analytic performance study. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl, 4(2): 1-22, 2008.
28. Z. Wang, S. Banerjee, and S. Jamin. Studying streaming video quality: from an application point of view. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2003.
29. W. Wu, A. Arefin, R. Rivas, K. Nahrstedt, R. Sheppard, and Z. Yang. Quality of experience in distributed interactive multimedia environments: Toward a theoretical framework. In Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2009.
30. X. Zhou, H. Uijterwaal, R. E. Kooij, and P. Van Mieghem. Estimation of perceived quality of service for applications on IPv6 networks. In Proc. ACM PM2HW2N, 2006.