Nuclear energy, risk, and emotions

Philosophy and Technology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 197-201

  Roeser, Sabine ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052742121     PISSN: 22105433     EISSN: 22105441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13347-011-0027-6     Document Type: Note

References (26)

1. Asveld, L., & Roeser, S. (Eds.). (2009). The ethics of technological risk. London: Earthscan.
2. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error. New York: Putnam.
3. Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709-724.
4. Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Derby, S. L., & Keeney, R. (1981). Acceptable risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Frijda, N. (1987). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail. A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
7. Hansson, S. O. (2004). Philosophical perspectives on risk. Techné, 8, 10-35.
8. Kahan, D. M. (2008). Two conceptions of emotion in risk regulation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 156, 2008.
9. Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (Eds.). (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport: Praeger.
10. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286.
12. Macilwain, C. (2011). Concerns over nuclear energy are legitimate. Nature, 471, 549.
13. Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Roberts, R. C. (2003). Emotions: an essay in aid of moral psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Roeser, S. (2006). The role of emotions in judging the moral acceptability of risks. Safety Science, 44, 689-700.
16. Roeser, S. (Ed.). (2010). Emotions and risky technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Roeser, S. (2011). Moral emotions and intuitions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: a component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
19. Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Risk and rationality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
21. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
22. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahnemann (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: heuristics and biases (pp. 397-420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.
24. Solomon, R. (1993). The passions: emotions and the meaning of life. Indianapolis: Hackett.
25. Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Laws of fear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Zagzebski, L. (2003). Emotion and moral judgment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66, 104-124.