The QoE provisioning-delivery-hysteresis and its importance for service provisioning in the Future Internet

2011 7th EURO-NGI Conference on Next Generation Internet Networks, NGI 2011 - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Hosfeld, Tobias ^a   Fiedler, Markus ^b   Zinner, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROL QUALITY; DELIVERY PROBLEMS; ENERGY EFFICIENT; FUTURE INTERNET; LIVE VIDEO STREAMING; MEASUREMENT STUDY; OR-NETWORKS; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCES; SERVICE PROVISIONING; USER PERCEPTIONS; VOICE OVER IP; WEB BROWSING;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HYSTERESIS; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; INTERNET TELEPHONY; TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; USER INTERFACES; VIDEOTEX; VOICE/DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

QUALITY OF SERVICE;

EID: 80052727701     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NGI.2011.5985864     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. V. Aggarwal, O. Akonjang, and A. Feldmann. Improving user and ISP experience through ISP-aided P2P locality. In Proceedings of 11th IEEE Global Internet Symposium 2008 (GI '08), Washington, DC, USA, April 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
2. D. Bonfiglio, M. Mellia, M. Meo, and D. Rossi. Detailed analysis of Skype traffic. Trans. Multi., 11(1):117-127, 2009.
3. C. Boutremans and J.-Y. Le Boudec. Adaptive joint playout buffer and fec adjustement for internet telephony. In In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, pages 652-662, 2002.
4. L. De Ciccoa, S. Mascolo, and V. Palmisano. Skype video responsiveness to bandwidth variations. In Proc. of NOSSDAV '08, 2008.
5. The SmoothIT Consortium. Requirements and Application Classes and Traffic Characteristic. In T. Hoßfeld and D. Staehle, editors, Deliverable D1.1: Requirements and Application Classes and Traffic Characteristic. European Seventh Framework Project SmoothIT FP7-2008-ICT-216259-STREP, v4.0 edition, 2009. available at http://www.smoothit.org.
6. U. Engelke, M. Kusuma, H.-J. Zepernick, and M. Caldera. Reducedreference metric design for objective perceptual quality assessment in wireless imaging. Signal Processing-Image Communication, pages 525-547, 2009.
7. T. Hoßfeld et. al. An Economic Traffic Management Approach to Enable the TripleWin for Users, ISPs, and Overlay Providers. In FIA Prague Book. IOS Press Books Online, Towards the Future Internet-A European Research Perspective, May 2009.
8. M. Fiedler. On Resource Sharing and Careful Overbooking for Network Virtualization. Int. Journal of Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (IJCNDS), 6(3):232-248, 2011.
9. M. Fiedler and T. Hoßfeld. Quality of Experience-Related Differential Equations and Provisioning-Delivery Hysteresis,. In 21st ITC Specialist Seminar on Multimedia Applications-Traffic, Performance and QoE, Miyazaki, Japan, March 2010.
10. ITU-T Recommendation G.107. The E-model, a computational model for use in transmission planning, 2005.
11. Graphics and Moscow State University Media Lab, CMC department. Msu video quality measurement tool.
12. T. Hoßfeld and A. Binzenḧofer. Analysis of Skype VoIP Traffic in UMTS: End-to-End QoS and QoE Measurements. Computer Networks, online http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2007.10.008, Vol 52/3 pp 650-666, February 2008.
13. T. Hoßfeld, P. Tran-Gia, and M. Fiedler. Quantification of Quality of Experience for Edge-Based Applications. In Proc. of ITC'20, Ottawa, Canada, Jun 2007.
14. ImCapture. Skypecap. http://www.imcapture.com/.
15. M. Mu, A. Mauthe, and F. Garcia. A Utility-Based QoS Model for Emerging Multimedia Applications. In Proc. of NGMAST '08, 2008.
16. S. Nedevschi, L. Popa, G. Iannaccone, S. Ratnasamy, and D. Wetherall. Reducing network energy consumption via sleeping and rate-adaptation. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI'08, pages 323-336, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2008. USENIX Association.
17. J. Peterson, V. Gurbani, and E. Marocci. Charter of the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) Working Group, Mar. 2009.
18. P. Reichl, S. Egger, R. Schatz, and A. D'Alconzo. The Logarithmic Nature of QoE and the Role of the Weber-Fechner Law in QoE Assessment. In Proc. of ICC'2010, Cape Town, South Africa, May 2010.
19. J. Shaikh, M. Fiedler, and D. Collange. Quality of experience from user and network perspectives. Annales des T́eĺecommunications, 65(1-2):47-57, 2010.
20. V. Valancius, N. Laoutaris, L. Massoulíe, C. Diot, and P. Rodriguez. Greening the internet with nano data centers. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, CoNEXT '09, pages 37-48, New York, USA, 2009. ACM.
21. Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13:600-612, 2004.
22. K. Yamagishi and T. Hayashi. Parametric Packet-Layer Model for Monitoring Video Quality of IPTV Services. In ICC '08. IEEE International Conference on Communications, pages 110-114, 2008.
23. T. Zinner, O. Abboud, O. Hohlfeld, T. Hoßfeld, and P. Tran-Gia. Towards QoE Management for Scalable Video Streaming,. In 21st ITC Specialist Seminar on Multimedia Applications-Traffic, Performance and QoE, Miyazaki, Japan, March 2010.
24. T. Zinner, O. Hohlfeld, O. Abboud, and T. Hoßfeld. Impact of Frame Rate and Resolution on Objective QoE Metrics. In International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, 2010, Trondheim, June 2010.
25. T. Zinner, T. Hoßfeld, T. Nawaz Minhas, and M. Fiedler. Controlled vs. Uncontrolled Degradations of QoE-The Provisioning-Delivery Hysteresis in Case of Video. In New Dimensions in the Assessment and Support of Quality of Experience (QoE) for Multimedia Applications, Tampere, June 2010.