Using 'payment by results' to fund the treatment of dependent drug users-proceed with care!

Addiction

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1725-1729

  Maynard, Alan ^a   Street, Andrew ^a   Hunter, Rachael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug treatment; Outcome; Provider payment.

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 80052717936     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03503.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. The Economist. Who Succeeds Get Paid. London: The Economist; 2011.
2. Home Office. 2010 Drug Strategy: Consultation Paper. London: Home Office; 2010.
3. National Audit Office. Tackling problem drug use. London: Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General HC 297 Session 2009-2010, 2010.
4. Street A., Maynard A. Activity based financing in England: the need for continual refinement of payment by results. Health Econ Policy Law 2007; 2: 419-27.
5. Strickland P. Social Impact Bonds-the Pilot at Peterborough Prison. London: House of Commons Library, SN/HA/5758; 2010.
6. Donmall M., Jones A., Davies L., Barnard M. Summary of Key Findings from the Drug Treatment Outcomes Research Study (DTORS). London: Home Office; 2009.
7. Gossop M., Marsden J., Stewart D., Treacy S. Outcomes after methadone maintenance and methadone reduction treatments: two-year follow-up results from the National Treatment Outcome Research Study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2001; 62: 255-64.
8. McLellan A. T., Kemp J., Brooks A., Carise D. Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: the Delaware experiment. Health Policy 2008; 87: 296-308.
9. Shen Y., Ellis R. How profitable is risk selection? A comparison of four risk adjustment models. Health Econ 2002; 11: 165-74.
10. Campbell D. J. Reform as experiments. Am Psychol 1969; 24: 409-29.
11. Campbell D. J., Russo M. J. Social Experimentation. London: Sage; 1999.