Measurement equivalence of interactive voice response and paper versions of the EQ-5D in a cancer patient sample

Value in Health

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 867-871

  Lundy, J Jason ^a   Coons, Stephen Joel ^a  

^a Patient Reported Outcome Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

electronic data capture; EQ 5D; equivalence; interactive voice response; measurement IVR

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EQ 5D QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANXIETY; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; VOICE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80052714599     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims, December 2009 http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM193282.pdf [Accessed February 10, 2011]
2. K. Abu-Hasaballah, A. James, and R.H. Aseltine Jr Lessons and pitfalls of interactive voice response in medical research Contemp Clinl Trials 28 2007 593 602 (Pubitemid 47212845)
3. J.T. Crow Receptive vocabulary acquisition for reading comprehension Modern Lang J 70 1986 242 250
4. B. Henriksen Three dimensions of vocabulary development Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21 1999 303 317
5. A.D. Krystal, J.K. Walsh, and E. Laska Sustained efficacy of eszopiclone over 6 months of nightly treatment: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with chronic insomnia Sleep 26 2003 793 799 (Pubitemid 39610622)
6. J.C. Mundt, K.A. Kobak, and L.V. Taylor Administration of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale using interactive voice response technology MD Computing 15 1998 31 39 (Pubitemid 128406314)
7. F. Alemi, R. Stephens, and T. Parran Automated monitoring of outcomes: application to the treatment of drug abuse Med Decis Making 14 1994 180 187 (Pubitemid 24116547)
8. J. Agel, J.H. Greist, and T. Rockwood Comparison of interactive voice response and written self-administered patient surveys for clinical research Orthopedics 24 2001 1155 1157 (Pubitemid 34023937)
9. E.F. Juniper, M. Scatz, B.A. Juniper, and R. Zeiger Evaluation of 2 interactive voice-response telephone versions of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires J Allergy Clini Immunol 122 2008 654 655
10. K. Lauritsen, and A. Degl' Innocenti Symptom recording in a randomized clinical trial: paper diaries vs. electronic or telephone data capture Control Clin Trials 25 2004 585 597 (Pubitemid 39592863)
11. K. Weiler, A.M. Christ, and G.G. Woodworth Quality of patient-reported outcome data captured using paper and interactive voice response diaries in an allergic rhinitis study: is electronic data capture really better? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 92 2004 335 339 (Pubitemid 38380790)
12. S.J. Wilson, A.S. Rich, and N.C. Rich Evaluation of actigraphy and automated telephoned questionnaires to assess hypnotic effects in insomnia Int Clin Psychopharmacol 19 2004 77 84 (Pubitemid 38316765)
13. S.J. Coons, C.J. Gwaltney, and R.D. Hays Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report Value Health 12 2009 419 429
14. R. Rabin, and F. de Charro EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group Ann Med 33; 2001 337 343 (Pubitemid 32675374)
15. D.L. Streiner, and G.R. Norman Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (3rd ed.) 2003 Oxford University Press New York
16. J.W. Shaw, J.A. Johnson, and S.J. Coons US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 model Medical Care 43 2005 203 220 (Pubitemid 40353904)
17. M. Hills, and P. Armitage The two period cross-over clinical trial Br J Clin Pharmacol 8 1979 7 20 (Pubitemid 9234327)
18. S.J. Walters, and J.E. Brazier Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D Qual Life Res 14 2005 1523 1532 (Pubitemid 40848233)
19. A.S. Pickard, M.P. Neary, and D. Cella Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer Health Qual Life Outcomes 5 2007 70
20. P.E. Shrout, and J.L. Fleiss Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 1979 420 428
21. K.O. McGraw, and S.P. Wong Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psychol Methods 1 1 1996 30 46 (Pubitemid 126421252)
22. J.C. Nunnally, and I.H. Bernstein Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.) 1994 McGraw-Hill New York
23. J.M. Lachin Introduction to sample size determination and power analysis for clinical trials Control Clin Trials 2 1981 93 113 (Pubitemid 11006595)
24. N. Luo, L.-H. Chew, and K.-Y. Fong Do English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D demonstrate measurement equivalence? An exploratory study Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1 2003 7
25. F. Gao, G.-Y. Ng, and Y.-B. Cheung The Singaporean English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients J Clin Epidemiol 62 2009 206 213
26. S. Macran Test-retest performance of EQ-5D R. Brooks, R. Rabin, F. de Charro, The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht, The Netherlands