Do some NO x emissions have negative environmental damages? Evidence and implications for policy

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 18, 2011, Pages 7613-7614

  Fraas, Art ^a   Lutter, Randall ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NITROGEN OXIDE; OZONE;

AIR QUALITY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXHAUST GAS; NOTE; PARTICULATE MATTER;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NITROGEN OXIDES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 80052705353     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es202622z     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. 2.5 Benefit Per Ton Estimates. http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/benmap/bpt.html.
2. Fann, N.; Fulcher, C.; Hubbell, B. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution Air Qual., Atmos. Health 2009, 2, 169-176
3. Muller, N. Z.; Mendelsohn, R. Efficient pollution regulation: getting the prices right Am. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99 (5) 1714-1739
4. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Delaware Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Under the 8-h Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). In Delaware Government Register, 2006; Vol. 10.
5. Environ Corporation Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx): User's Guide to the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) Version 2.00. www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/information/camx.pdf.