-
1
-
-
49749200808
-
Experimental augmentation of coronary flow by retardation of arterial pressure pulse
-
Kantrowitz A, Kantrowitz A. Experimental augmentation of coronary flow by retardation of arterial pressure pulse. Surgery 1953;34:678-87.
-
(1953)
Surgery
, vol.34
, pp. 678-687
-
-
Kantrowitz, A.1
Kantrowitz, A.2
-
2
-
-
50549166322
-
Diastolic balloon pumping (with carbon dioxide) in the aorta-a mechanical assistance to the failing circulation
-
Moulopoulos SG, Topaz S, Kolff WJ. Diastolic balloon pumping (with carbon dioxide) in the aorta-a mechanical assistance to the failing circulation. Am Heart J 1962;63:669-75.
-
(1962)
Am Heart J
, vol.63
, pp. 669-675
-
-
Moulopoulos, S.G.1
Topaz, S.2
Kolff, W.J.3
-
3
-
-
54349107151
-
A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction
-
Seyfarth M, Sibbing D, Bauer I, etal. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:1584-8.
-
(2008)
J Am Coll Cardiol
, vol.52
, pp. 1584-1588
-
-
Seyfarth, M.1
Sibbing, D.2
Bauer, I.3
-
4
-
-
69949164654
-
Percutaneous left ventricule assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
-
Cheng JM, den Uil CA, Hoeks SE, etal. Percutaneous left ventricule assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2102-8.
-
(2009)
Eur Heart J
, vol.30
, pp. 2102-2108
-
-
Cheng, J.M.1
den Uil, C.A.2
Hoeks, S.E.3
-
5
-
-
80052678906
-
PROTECT II: a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of intra-aortic balloon pump versus Impella for hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI
-
Abstract.
-
O'Neill W, Kleiman N, Dixon S, etal. PROTECT II: a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of intra-aortic balloon pump versus Impella for hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol; ACC 2011:2131-8. Abstract.
-
(2011)
J Am Coll Cardiol; ACC
, pp. 2131-2138
-
-
O'Neill, W.1
Kleiman, N.2
Dixon, S.3
-
6
-
-
80052688342
-
Will the net clinical benefit of the prophylactic use of the Impella LP 2.5 device demonstrate superiority over the intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention?
-
Abstract.
-
Syed AI, Kakkar A, Li Y, etal. Will the net clinical benefit of the prophylactic use of the Impella LP 2.5 device demonstrate superiority over the intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention? J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 53(10):A30. Abstract.
-
(2009)
J Am Coll Cardiol
, vol.53
, Issue.10
-
-
Syed, A.I.1
Kakkar, A.2
Li, Y.3
-
7
-
-
0015106070
-
Arterial baroreceptor response to intra aortic balloon assistance
-
Normann NA, Kennedy JH. Arterial baroreceptor response to intra aortic balloon assistance. J Surg Res 1971;11:396-400.
-
(1971)
J Surg Res
, vol.11
, pp. 396-400
-
-
Normann, N.A.1
Kennedy, J.H.2
|