Angle measurement reproducibility using EOSThree-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 20, 2011, Pages

  Ilharreborde, Brice ^a,b   Steffen, Jean Sebastien ^b   Nectoux, Eric ^c   Vital, Jean Marc ^c   Mazda, Keyvan ^a   Skalli, Wafa ^b   Obeid, Ibrahim ^c  

^a HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DE BIOMÉCANIQUE   (France)

^c BORDEAUX UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

scoliosis; three dimensional reconstruction; vertebra

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT DISEASE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PEDICLE SCREW; PELVIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROTATION; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNAL FIXATORS; MALE; RADIOGRAPHY; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; SPINE;

EID: 80052674282     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182293548     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dubousset J. Importance of the three-dimensional concept in the treatment of scoliotic deformities. In: Dansereau J, ed. International Symposium on 3D Scoliotic Deformities Joined with the VIIth International Symposium on Spinal Deformity and Surface Topography. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Gustav Fisher Verlag; 1992: 302-11.
2. Perdriolle R, Vidal J. Morphology of scoliosis: Three-dimensional evolution. Orthopedics 1987; 10: 909-15. (Pubitemid 17087516)
3. Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, et al. [A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system]. Bull Acad Natl Med 2005; 189: 287-97; discussion 97-300.
4. Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, et al. 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 2009; 31: 681-7.
5. Deschenes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, et al. Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 989-94.
6. Gille O, Champain N, Benchikh-El-Fegoun A, et al. Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007; 32: 568-73. (Pubitemid 46398924)
7. Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Ondra S, et al. Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine 2008; 33: 1051-4. (Pubitemid 351630212)
8. Quan GM, Gibson MJ. Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: Does higher implant density improve correction? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 562-7.
9. Ilharreborde B, Even J, Lefevre Y, et al. Hybrid constructs for tridi-mensional correction of the thoracic spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative analysis of Universal Clamps versus hooks. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: 306-14.
10. Takahata M, Ito M, Abumi K, et al. Comparison of novel ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tape versus conventional metal wire for sublaminar segmental fixation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 449-55. (Pubitemid 47357503)
11. Despres P, Beaudoin G, Gravel P, et al. Physical characteristics of a low-dose gas microstrip detector for orthopedic X-ray imaging. Med Phys 2005; 32: 1193-204. (Pubitemid 40586802)
12. Baudoin A, Mitton D, Skalli W. An Accurate Pelvis Axis System Using a Low Dose X-Ray Device. In: 6th Annual Conference of the International Society for Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Montreal, Quebec; 2006.
13. Sangole A, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. The central hip vertical axis: a reference axis for the scoliosis research society three-dimensional classification of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010; 35: E530-4.
14. Pomero V, Mitton D, Laporte S, et al. Fast accurate stereoradio-graphic 3D-reconstruction of the spine using a combined geometric and statistic model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004; 19: 240-7. (Pubitemid 38299198)
15. International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (True-ness and Precision) of Measurement Methods and Results-Part 2: Basic Method for the Determination of Repeatability and Repro-ducibility of a Standard Measurement Method. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2002.
16. Gangnet N, Dumas R, Pomero V, et al. Three-dimensional spinal and pelvic alignment in an asymptomatic population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31: E507-12. (Pubitemid 43999955)
17. Steib JP, Dumas R, Mitton D, et al. Surgical correction of scoliosis by in situ contouring: A detorsion analysis. Spine 2004; 29: 193-9. (Pubitemid 38112504)
18. Hong JY, Suh SW, Easwar TR, et al. Evaluation of the three dimensional deformities in scoliosis surgery with computed tomography: Efficacy and relationship with clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 Feb 15. [Epub ahead of print] Pub Med PMID: 21325983.
19. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20: 1351-8.
20. Vedantam R, Lenke LG, Keeney JA, et al. Comparison of standing sagittal spinal alignment in asymptomatic adolescents and adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 211-15. (Pubitemid 28128156)
21. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, et al. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001; 26: E235-42.
22. Abul-Kasim K, Overgaard A, Maly P, et al. Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol. 2009; 19 (3): 610-18.
23. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 320-7. (Pubitemid 20151913)
24. Rillardon L, Levassor N, Guigui P, et al. [Validation of a tool to measure pelvic and spinal parameters of sagittal balance]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2003; 89: 218-27. (Pubitemid 36626613)
25. Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, et al. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998; 23: 551-5.
26. Barsanti CM, deBari A, Covino BM. The torsion meter: A critical review. J Pediatr Orthop 1990; 10: 527-31. (Pubitemid 20315722)
27. Richards BS. Measurement error in assessment of vertebral rotation using the Perdriolle torsionmeter. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992; 17: 513-17.