Phenotypic plasticity of yield and agronomic traits in cereals and rapeseed at high latitudes

Field Crops Research

Volumn 124, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 261-269

  Peltonen Sainio, P ^a   Jauhiainen, L ^a   Sadras, V O ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b SOUTH AUSTRALIAN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Barley; Growth; Lodging; Norms of reaction; Oat; Oilseed rape; Quality; Rye; Stress; Turnip rape; Wheat; Yield stability

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; CEREAL; CROP YIELD; CULTIVAR; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GROWTH RATE; MATURATION; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PROTEIN; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; YIELD RESPONSE;

FINLAND;

AVENA FATUA; BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA RAPA; BRASSICA RAPA SUBSP. RAPA; HORDEUM; SECALE CEREALE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 80052670065     PISSN: 03784290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams M.W., Grafius J.E. Yield component compensation. Alternative interpretations. Crop Sci. 1971, 11:33-35.
2. Aikasalo R. The results of six-row barley breeding and the genetic origin of varieties released. J. Agric. Sci. Finl. 1988, 60:293-305.
3. Auld J.R., Agrawal A.A., Relyea R.A. Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proc. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2010, 277:503-511.
4. Bradshaw A.D. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 1965, 13:115-155.
5. Calderini D.F., Slafer G.A. Has yield stability changed with genetic improvement of wheat yield?. Euphytica 1999, 107:51-59.
6. Calviño P.A., Sadras V.O. On-farm assessment of constraints to wheat yield in the south-eastern Pampas. Field Crops Res. 2002, 74:1-11.
7. De Vita P., Mastrangelo A.M., Matteu L., Mazzucotelli E., Virzi N., Palumbo M., Lo Storto M., Rizza R., Cattivelli L. Genetic improvement effects of yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy. Field Crops Res. 2010, 119:68-77.
8. DeWitt T.J., Scheiner S.M. Phenotypic Plasticity. Functional and Conceptual Approaches 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Dingemanse N.J., Kazem A.J.N., Reale D., Wright J. Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 25:81-89.
10. Edwards C.E., Weinig C. The quantitative-genetic and QTL architecture of trait integration and modularity in Brassica rapa across simulated seasonal settings. Heredity 2010, 106:661-677.
11. Finlay K.W., Wilkinson G.N. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1963, 14:742-754.
12. Foulkes M.J., Slafer G.A., Davies W.J., Berry P.M., Sylvester-Bradley R., Martre P., Calderini D.F., Griffiths S., Reynolds M.P. Raising yield potential of wheat. III. Optimizing partitioning to grain while maintaining lodging resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:469-486.
13. Gambín B.L., Borrás L. Resource distribution and the trade-off between seed number and seed weight: a comparison across crop species. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2009, 156:91-102.
14. Kangas A., Laine A., Niskanen M., Salo Y., Vuorinen M., Jauhiainen L., Nikander H. Virallisten lajikekokeiden tulokset 2003-2010: Results of Official Variety Trials 2003-2010 2010, MTT Kasvu 13, 174 p. ISBN 978-952-487-303-1 (Partly in English).
15. Kliebenstein D.J. Systems biology uncovers the foundation of natural genetic diversity. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152:480-486.
16. Lacaze X., Hayes P.M., Korol A. Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 2009, 102:63-173.
17. Lancashire P.D., Bleiholder H., Boom T., vandenLangeluddeke P., Stauss R., Weber E., Witzenberger A.A. A uniform decimal code for growth stages of crops and weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1991, 119:561-601.
18. Loomis R.S., Connor D.J. Crop Ecology. Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 538 p.
19. Mukula J., Rantanen O. Climatic risks to the yield and quality of field crops in Finland. I. Basic facts about Finnish field crops production. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 1987, 26:1-18.
20. Mukula J., Rantanen O. Climatic risks to the yield and quality of field crops in Finland. III. Winter rye 1969-1986. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 1989, 28:3-11.
21. Mukula J., Rantanen O. Climatic risks to the yield and quality of field crops in Finland. IV. Winter wheat 1969-1986. Ann. Agric. Fenn. 1989, 28:13-19.
22. Nicotra A.B., Davidson A. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and plant water use. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37:117-127.
23. Nicotra A.B., Atkin O.K., Bonser S.P., Davidson A.M., Finnegan E.J., Mathesius U., Poot P., Purugganan M.D., Richards C.L., Valladares F., van Kleunen M. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15:684-692.
24. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Hannukkala A. Declining rapeseed yields in Finland: how, why and what next?. J. Agric. Sci. 2007, 145:587-598.
25. Peltonen-Sainio P., Kangas A., Salo Y., Jauhiainen L. Grain number dominates grain weight in cereal yield determination: evidence basing on 30 years' multi-location trials. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:179-188.
26. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L. Association of growth dynamics, yield components and seed quality in long-term trials covering rapeseed cultivation history at high latitudes. Field Crops Res. 2008, 108:101-108.
27. Peltonen-Sainio P., Rajala A., Känkänen H., Hakala K. Improving farming systems in northern European conditions. Crop Physiology: Applications for Genetic Improvement and Agronomy 2009, 71-97. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. V.O. Sadras, D. Calderini (Eds.).
28. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Hakala K. Are there indications of climate change induced increases in variability of major field crops in the northernmost European conditions?. Agric. Food Sci. 2009, 18:206-226.
29. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Rajala A., Muurinen S. Tiller traits of spring cereals in tiller-depressing long day conditions. Field Crops Res. 2009, 113:82-89.
30. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Laurila I.P. Cereal yield trends in northern European conditions: changes in yield potential and its realisation. Field Crops Res. 2009, 110:85-90.
31. Peltonen-Sainio P., Jauhiainen L., Hakala K. Crop responses to temperature and precipitation according to long-term multi-location trials at high-latitude conditions. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149:49-62.
32. Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rajala, A., Jauhiainen, L. Hidden viability risks in the use of farm-saved small-grain seed. J. Agric. Sci, doi:10.1017/S0021859611000335.
33. Peltonen-Sainio P., Hakala K., Jauhiainen L. Climate induced overwintering challenges for wheat and rye in northern agriculture. Acta Agric. Scand., B Soil Plant Sci. 2011, 61:75-83.
34. Pigliucci M. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol. Lett. Wiley-Blackwell 2003, 265-272.
35. Reymond M., Muller B., Leonardi A., Charcosset A., Tardieu F. Combining quantitative trait loci analysis and an ecophysiological model to analyze the genetic variability of the responses of maize leaf growth to temperature and water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131:664-675.
36. Sadras V.O. Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Res. 2007, 100:125-138.
37. Sadras V.O., Denison R.F. Do plant parts compete for resources? An evolutionary perspective. New Phytol. 2009, 183:565-574.
38. Sadras, V.O., Lawson, C. Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007. Crop Pasture Sci., in press.
39. Sadras V.O., Stevens R.M., Pech J.M., Taylor E.J., Nicholas P.R., McCarthy M.G. Quantifying phenotypic plasticity of berry traits using an allometric-type approach: a case study on anthocyanins and sugars in berries of Cabernet Sauvignon. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2007, 13:72-80.
40. Sadras V.O., Reynolds M., De la Vega A.J., Petrie P.R., Robinson R. Phenotypic plasticity of phenology and yield in wheat, sunflower and grapevine. Field Crops Res. 2009, 110:242-250.
41. Smith C.C., Fretwell S.D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 1974, 108:499-506.
42. Snell-Rood E.C., Van Dyken J.D., Cruickshank T., Wade M.J., Moczek A.P. Toward a population genetic framework of developmental evolution: the costs, limits, and consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Bioessays 2010, 32:71-81.
43. Trentacoste, E.R., Sadras, V.O., Puertas, C.M., 2011. Effects of the source:sink ratio on the phenotypic plasticity of stem water potential in olive (Olea europaea L.). J. Exp. Bot., doi:10.1093/jxb/err044.
44. Valido A., Schaefer H.M., Jordano P. Colour, design and reward: phenotypic integration of fleshy fruit displays. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:751-760.
45. Westlake D.F. Comparisons of plant productivity. Biol. Rev. 1963, 38:385-425.
46. Woltereck R. Weitere experimentelle Vntersuchungen iiber Artverandenmg, spcziell fiber das Wesen quantitativer Artunterschiede bei Daphniden. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 1909, 19:110-172.
47. Zhu J.M., Zhang C.C., Lynch J.P. The utility of phenotypic plasticity of root hair length for phosphorus acquisition. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37:313-322.