Performance property prediction supporting variability for adaptive mobile systems

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Brataas, Gunnar ^a   Jiang, Shanshan ^a   Reichle, Roland ^b   Geihs, Kurt ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Autonomic computing; Mobile systems

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION FRAMEWORK; AUTONOMIC COMPUTING; CONTEXT-AWARE MOBILE APPLICATION; META MODEL; MOBILE SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE MODELLING; PERFORMANCE PROPERTIES; SELF-ADAPTIVE; STRUCTURE AND PERFORMANCE;

MIDDLEWARE;

INTERNET PROTOCOLS;

EID: 80052668276     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2019136.2019178     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Di Marco and C. Mascolo. Physical Analysis and Prediction of Physically Mobile Systems. In WOSP, pages 129 - 132. ACM, 2007. (Pubitemid 47485722)
2. G. Franks, T. Al-Omari, M. Woodside, O. Das, and S. Derisavi. Enhanced Modelling and Solution of Layered Queueing Networks. Transactions on Software Engineering, 35(2):148 - 161, 2009.
3. V. Grassi, R. Mirandola, and E. Randazzo. Model-Driven Assessment of QoQ-Aware Self-Adaptation. In SW Eng. for Self-Adaptive Systems, LNCS 5525, pages 201 - 222. Springer, 2009.
4. HP. QuickSpecs, HP Compaq 2510p Notebook PC. http://h18000.www1.hp.com/ products/quickspecs/12717div/12717div.PDF.
5. P. H. Hughes. The IMSE Conceptual Model. Technical report, Esprit Project no. 2134: Integrated Modelling Support Environment - IMSE, 1989.
6. P. H. Hughes and J. S. Løvstad. A Generic Model for Quantifiable Software Deployment. In Conf. on SW Eng. Advances, pages 22 - 22. IEEE, 2007.
7. JProbe. www.quest.com/jprobe/.
8. J. Kephart and R. Das. Achieving Self-Management via Utility Functions. IEEE Internet Computing, 11(1):40 - 48, 2007. (Pubitemid 46332142)
9. M. Litoio. A Performance Analysis Method for Autonomic Computing Systems. Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 2(1):1 - 29, 2007.
10. H. Ma, I.-L. Yen, J. Zhou, and K. Cooper. QoS analysis for component-based embedded software: Models and methodology. Journal of Systems and Software, 79(6):859 - 870, 2006.
11. D. A. Menascé, V. A. Almeida, and L. W. Dowdy. Performance by Design. Prentice Hall, 2004.
12. Microsoft. Overview of performance monitoring. technet.microsoft.com/en- us/library/cc961845.aspx.
13. http://ist-music.berlios.de/.
14. OMG. UML Profile for MARTE. www.omgmarte.org/spec/MARTE/1.0, 2009.
15. R. Rouvoy et al. MUSIC: Middleware Support for Self-Adaptation in Ubiquitous and Service-Oriented Environments. In SW Eng. for Self-Adaptive Systems, LNCS 5525, pages 164 - 182. Springer, 2009.
16. M. Satyanarayanan. Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Personal Communications, 8(4):10 - 17, 2001. (Pubitemid 33060762)
17. J. Sousa, V. Poladian, D. Garlan, S. B., and S. M. Task-Based Adaptation for Ubiquitous Computing. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 36(3):328 - 340, 2006.
18. M. Woodside, V. Vetland, M. Courtois, and S. Bayarov. Resource Function Capture for Performance Aspects of Software Components and Sub-systems. In Performance Engineering, LNCS 2047, pages 239 - 256. Springer, 2001. (Pubitemid 33288493)