Exploring the use of reference architectures in the development of product line artifacts

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Nakagawa, Elisa Yumi ^a   Antonino, Pablo Oliveira ^b   Becker, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Reference architecture; Software product line; Spl design method

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN SPECIFIC; LOWER COST; PRODUCT FAMILIES; PRODUCT LINE ARCHITECTURE; PRODUCT-LINES; REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINES; SPL DESIGN METHOD;

PRODUCTIVITY;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 80052665498     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2019136.2019168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. C. Atkinson, J. Bayer, C. Bunse, E. Kamsties, O. Laitenberger, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, B. Peach, J. Wust, and J. Zettel. Component-based product line engineering with UML. Component Software. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
2. AUTOSAR. AUTOSAR (AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture). [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. Available in: http://www.autosar.org/(acessed 05/25/2011).
3. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman. Software Architecture in Practice. The SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, 2 edition, 2003.
4. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, T. Widen, and J.-M. DeBaud. PuLSE: A methodology to develop software product lines. In SSR'99, pages 223-234, Los Angeles, USA, May 1999.
5. F. Buschmann, R. Meunier, H. Rohnert, P. Sommerlad, and M. Stal. Pattern-oriented Software Architecture: A System of Patterns, volume 1. John Wiley & Sons, 1996.
6. F. A. Cioch, J. M. Brabbs, and L. Sieh. The impact of software architecture reuse on development processes and standards. Journal of Systems and Software, 50(3):221-236, 2000. (Pubitemid 30584273)
7. P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2002.
8. Continua Health Alliance. Continua Health Alliance. [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. http://www.continuaalliance.org/(acessed 05/17/2011).
9. U. Eklund, Örjan Askerdal, J. Granholm, A. Alminger, and J. Axelsson. Experience of introducing reference architectures in the development of automotive electronic systems. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 30(4):1-6, 2005.
10. W. Frakes and C. Terry. Software reuse metrics and models: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 28(2):415-435, June 1996. (Pubitemid 126627762)
11. W. B. Frakes and K. Kang. Software reuse research: Status and future. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(7):529-536, 2005. (Pubitemid 41387747)
12. Fraunhofer IESE. Fraunhofer PuLSE - Product Line Software Engineering. (Internal documentation), May 2011.
13. B. P. Gallagher. Using the architecture tradeo- analysis method to evaluate a reference architecture: A case study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2000-TN-007, 2000.
14. H. Gomaa. Designing Software Product Lines with UML. Addison-Wesley, July 2004.
15. I. John, J. Knodel, T. Lehner, and D. Muthig. A practical guide to product line scoping. In SPLC'2006, pages 3-12, Baltimore, Maryland, 2006. (Pubitemid 47133183)
16. K. C. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak, and A. Peterson. Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis. Feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, SEI, Pittsburgh, USA, 1990.
17. K. C. Kang, S. Kim, J. Lee, K. Kim, E. Shin, and M. Huh. FORM: A feature-oriented reuse method with domain-speci-c reference architectures. Annals of Software Engineering, 5(1):143-168, 2004.
18. P. Kruchten. An iterative software development process centered on architecture. In Proc. 4ème Congrès de Génie Logiciel, pages 369-378, Toulouse, France, 1991.
19. D. Li. A robust-reference-architecture-centric approach for high availability SPLE in security inspection domain. In SPLC'2010, pages 259-262, Jeju Island, South Korea, 2010.
20. M. Matinlassi. Comparison of software product line architecture design methods: COPA, FAST, FORM, KobrA and QADA. In ICSE'04, pages 127-136, Scotland, UK, 2004.
21. E. Y. Nakagawa, P. O. Antonino, and M. Becker. Reference architecture and product line architecture: A subtle but critical difference. In ECSA'2011, Essen, Germany, Sept. 2011. (accepted to publication).
22. E. Y. Nakagawa, F. Ferrari, M. M. F. Sasaki, and J. C. Maldonado. An aspect-oriented reference architecture for software engineering environments. Journal of Systems and Software, 84:1-17, 2011.
23. National Instruments. Reference architecture for mobile robotics. [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. Available in http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/ tut/p/id/10820 (Access 05/29/2011).
24. E. Nguyen, R. Pettit, and M. Hecht. Future directions in ight software assurance. Crosslink, 12(1):7-11, 2011.
25. K. Pohl, G. Bockle, and F. van der Linden. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
26. Software Engineering Institute. A framework for software product line practice, version 5.0. [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. Available in http://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/frame-report/index.html (Access in 06/10/2011).
27. Software Engineering Institute. Software product line: Case studies. [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. Available in http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ productlines/casestudies/index.cfm (Access in 05/29/2011).
28. UniversAAL Project. The UniversAAL Reference Architecture. [On-line], World Wide Web, 2011. Available in http://www.universaal.org/images/stories/ deliverables/D1.3-B.pdf (Access in 06/12/2011).
29. D. M. Weiss and C. T. R. Lai. Software Product-Line Engineering: A Family-based Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
30. Z. You-Sheng and H. Yu-Yun. Architecture-based software process model. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 28(2):1-5, Mar. 2003.