Cointegration: A novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 467, Issue 2133, 2011, Pages 2712-2732

  Cross, Elizabeth J ^a   Worden, Keith ^a   Chen, Qian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS   (China)

Author keywords

Cointegration; Environmental variations; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

TIME SERIES; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

COINTEGRATION; DAMAGE-SENSITIVE FEATURES; DATA SETS; ENVIRONMENTAL TRENDS; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATIONS; LABORATORY CONDITIONS; LINEAR COMBINATIONS; NON-STATIONARY DYNAMICS; NON-STATIONARY TIME SERIES; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; QUASI-STATIC; STRUCTURAL HEALTH;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 80052661768     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2011.0023     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Alampalli, S. 2000 Effects of testing, analysis, damage, and environment on modal parameters. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 14, 63-74. (doi:10.1006/mssp. 1999.1271) (Pubitemid 30567650)
2. Anderson, T. 1971 The statistical analysis of time series. New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Chen, Q., Kruger, U. & Leung, A. 2009 Cointegration testing method for monitoring nonstationary processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 3533-3543. (doi:10.1021/ie801611s)
4. Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. 1979 Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 427-431. (doi:10.2307/2286348)
5. Dickey, D. & Fuller, W. 1981 Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica 49, 1057-1072. (doi:10.2307/1912517)
6. Engle, R. & Granger, C. 1987 Co-integration and error-correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276. (doi:10.2307/1913236)
7. Fuller, W. 1996 Introduction to statistical time series. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
8. Johansen, S. 1988 Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 12, 231-254. (doi:10.1016/0165-1889 (88) 90041-3)
9. Johansen, S. 1995 Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Juselius, K. 2006 The cointegrated VAR model: methodology and applications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11. Kullaa, J. 2004 Structural health monitoring under variable environmental or operational conditions. In Proc. of 2nd European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Munich.
12. Maddala, G. & Kim, I. 1998 Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
13. Manson, G. 2002 Identifying damage sensitive, environment insensitive features for damage detection. In Proc. of the IES Conf., Swansea, UK.
14. Montgomery, D. C. 2009 Statistical quality control: a modern introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Ni, Y., Zhou, H. & Ko, J. 2009 Generalization capability of neural network models for temperaturefrequency correlation using monitoring data. J. Struct. Eng. 135, 1290-1300. (doi:10.1061/(ASCE) ST.1943-541X.0000050)
16. Peeters, B. & De Roeck, G. 2001 One-year monitoring of the Z24-bridge: environmental effects versus damage events. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 30, 149-171. (doi:10.1002/1096-9845 (200102) 30:2<149::AID-EQE1>3.0. CO;2-Z) (Pubitemid 32206014)
17. Peeters, B., Maeck, J. & Roeck, G. 2001 Vibration-based damage detection in civil engineering: excitation sources and temperature effects. Smart Mater. Struct. 10, 518. (doi:10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/314) (Pubitemid 32637035)
18. Perman, R. 1993 Cointegration: an introduction to the literature. J. Econ. Stud. 18, 3-30.
19. Sohn, H., Dzwonczyk, M., Straser, E. G., Kiremidjian, A. S., Law, K. H. & Meng, T. 1999 An experimental study of temperature effect on modal parameters of the Alamosa Canyon Bridge. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28, 879-897. (doi:10.1002/(SICI) 1096-9845 (199908) 28:8<879::AID-EQE845>3.0. CO;2-V)
20. Sohn, H., Farrar, C. R., Hunter, N. F. & Worden, K. 2001 Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 123, 706-711. (doi:10.1115/1.1410933) (Pubitemid 33716002)
21. Stock, J. & Watson, M. 1988 Testing for common trends. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83, 1097-1107. (doi:10.2307/2290142)
22. Stock, J. & Watson, M. 1993 A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica 61, 783-820. (doi:10.2307/2951763)
23. Surace, C. & Worden, K. 1997 Some aspects of novelty detection methods. In Proc. of the Third Int. Conf. on Modern Practice in Stress and Vibration Analysis, Dublin.
24. Worden, K., Sohn, H. & Farrar, C. R. 2002 Novelty Detection in a changing environment; regression and interpolation approaches. J. Sound Vib. 258, 741-761. (doi:10.1006/jsvi.2002.5148) (Pubitemid 41100826)
25. Worden, K., Farrar, C. R., Manson, G. & Park, G. 2007 The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring. Proc. R. Soc. A 463, 1639-1664. (doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1834)