Adiabatic charge and spin transport in interacting quantum wires

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 68, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 353211-3532117

  Sharma, Prashant ^a   Chamon, Claudio ^a  

^a Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; ELECTRON; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MODEL; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; QUANTUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM WIRE; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; TIME;

EID: 80052648759     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D.J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983).
2. Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B 34, 5093 (1986).
3. Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1812 (1990).
4. P.W. Brouwer, Phys. Rev. B 58, 10 135 (1998).
5. I.L. Aleiner and A.V. Andreev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1286 (1998).
6. F. Zhou, B. Spivak, and B. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 608 (1999).
7. P. Sharma and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 096401 (2001).
8. D.E. Feldman and Y. Gefen, cond-mat/0111411 (unpublished).
9. M. Stone, Bosonization (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
10. C. Chamon, D.E. Freed, and X.G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 51, 2363 (1995).
11. J. Schwinger, J. Math. Phys. 2, 407 (1961).
12. J. Rammer and H. Smith, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 323 (1986).
13. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996).
14. C.L. Kane and M.P.A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 46, 15 233 (1992).
15. A. Furusaki and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5239 (1996), and references therein.
16. P. Fendley, A.W. Ludwig, and H. Saleur, Phys. Rev. B 52, 8934 (1995).
17. X.G. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 41, 12 838 (1990).
18. X.G. Wen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6, 1711 (1992).
19. R.B. Laughlin, in The Quantum Hall Effect, edited by R.E. Prange and S.M. Girvin (New York, Springer-Verlag, 1987).
20. F. Lesage, H. Saleur, and P. Simonetti, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7598 (1997).
21. F. Guinea, V. Hakim, and A. Muramatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 263 (1985).
22. K.A. Matveev, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1743 (1995).
23. F.D.M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
24. We would like to emphasize that a strictly linear spectrum is not a necessary requisite for determining the nature of the adiabatic limit. This is because the adiabatic limit for a 1D system with global chiral symmetry is determined by a set of relevant operators, and terms that contribute to nonlinearity of the spectrum are irrelevant in the RG sense (Ref. 23).
25. F/ℓ, but only that at higher energies the potential structure gets resolved.
26. F-Fourier transform (n>1) of the potential V(x). As should be clear from the analysis presented here, it is only the most relevant operator that determines the conductance in the adiabatic limit.