Why clinical alarms are a 'top ten' hazard: How you can help reduce the risk

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology

Volumn 45, Issue SPRING, 2011, Pages 17-23

  Keller, James P ^a   Diefes, Rich ^a   Graham, Kelly ^a   Meyers, Mark ^a   Pelczarski, Kathy ^a  

^a ECRI INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALARM MONITOR; CONFUSION; FATIGUE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SHORT SURVEY; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MONITORING; STANDARD;

CLINICAL ALARMS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT CARE;

EID: 80052634828     PISSN: 08998205     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-45.s1.17     Document Type: Short Survey

References (16)

1. ECRI Institute. Top Ten Technology Hazards for 2011. Health Devices. (2010 November). Vol. 39, No. 11; 404-16.
2. ECRI Institute. Top 10 Health Technology Hazards: Are You Protecting Your Patients from These High-Priority Risks? Health Devices. (2007 November). Vol. 36, No. 11; 345-51.
3. Kowalczyk L. MGH death spurs review of patient monitors. The Boston Globe 2010 Feb 21. Also available: www.boston.com/news/health/articles/2010/02/21/ mgh-death-spurs-review-of-patient-monitors.
4. ACCE Healthcare Technology Foundation. Impact of clinical alarms on patient safety. (2006). Available at: http://www.thehtf.org/White%20Paper.pdf.
5. Yoder JY, Phillips A. Alarm Management: Clinical Perspective: Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology. March/April 2010; 44(2):152-3.
6. International Electrotechnical Commission. General requirements for basic safety and essential performance -- Collateral standard: General requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems. International standard IEC 60601-1-8, section AAA.0.2 (2006).
7. ECRI Institute. Alarm Notification for Physiologic Monitoring: Could You Benefit from a New Strategy? Health Devices. 2007 January; 36(1):5-21.
8. HCPro. An Alarming Danger: Experts Give Advice on Avoiding Alarm Fatigue. Patient Safety Monitor. March 2001; 12(3):9-11.
9. McNeal, M. The Five Steps to Integrated Alarm Management: Improving Clinical Decision Making and Patient Safety. Healthcare Technology Horizons, AAMI, 2005.
10. ECRI Institute. The Hazards of Alarm Overload: Keeping Excessive Physiologic Monitoring Alarms from Impeding Care. Health Devices. 2007 March; 36(3):73-83.
11. ECRI Institute. Best Practices for Health Technology Management. Health Devices. 2006 December; 35(12):437-40.
12. ECRI Institute. Best Practices for Health Technology Management: Valuable Lessons from the 2010 Health Devices Achievement Award Finalists. Health Devices. 2010 December; 39(12):444-9.
13. Graham, KC, and Cvach, M. Monitor Alarm Fatigue: Standardizing Use of Physiological Monitors and Decreasing Nuisance Alarms. American Journal of Critical Care 2010; 19:28-34.
14. Kowalczyk L. Patient alarms often unheard, unheeded. Boston Globe 2011, Feb 13. Also available: http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/health/articles/2011/02/ 13/patient-alarms-often-unheard-unheeded/.
15. Kowalczyk L. No easy solutions for alarm fatigue. Boston Globe 2011, Feb 14. Also available: http://wap.boston.com/art/35/news/local/massachusetts/ articles/2011/02/14/no-easy-solutions-for-alarm-fatigue/.
16. Keller J. "Making Clinical Alarm Management a Patient Safety Priority."ECRI Institute's Patient Safety Blog, 2010 Jul 29; https://www. ecri.org/blog/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=52.