Project alliance the competitive single target-cost approach;Allianssiurakka kilpailullinen yhden tavoitekustannuksen menettely

VTT Tiedotteita - Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus

Volumn , Issue 2471, 2009, Pages 1-74

  Lahdenperä, Pertti ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Alliance contracting; Construction project; Cooperation; Incentive contract; Integrated project delivery; Procurement systems; Project alliance; Target cost contracting

Indexed keywords

ALLIANCE CONTRACTING; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; COOPERATION; INCENTIVE CONTRACTS; INTEGRATED PROJECT; PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS; PROJECT ALLIANCE; TARGET COST CONTRACTING;

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY; DESIGN; INTEGRATION; PUBLISHING; RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

COSTS;

EID: 80052619587     PISSN: 12350605     EISSN: 14550865     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ACA. 1999. Relationship contracting. Optimising project Outcomes. Australian Contractors Association (ACA), North Sydney.
2. ACEA. 2005. Alliance contracting. ACEA Discussion Paper, Nov. 05. The Association of Consulting Engineers Australia (ACEA), Sydney.
3. Clifton, C. & Duffield, C. 2006. Improved PFI/PPP service outcomes through the integration of Alliance principles. International Journal of Project Management 24(7), s. 573-586. (Pubitemid 44350058)
4. CRC. 2004. Motorway alliance drives performance improvement. The BRITE Project: Innovation case study No 3. Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation CRC, Brisbane.
5. Davis, J. & Cowan, B. 2008. Competitive alliances: just a client driven VFM approach? Southern Pacific Alliance Network, Milton.
6. Department of Public Works. 2008a. Procurement strategy and contract selection. Capital works management framework. Queensland Government, Brisbane.
7. Department of Public Works. 2008b. Relational procurement options - alliance and early contractor involvement contract [version July 08]. Queensland Government, Brisbane.
8. Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivi 2004/18/EY. 2004. Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti L 134/114 (30.4. 2004).
9. Evans & Peck. 2003. Port of Brisbane Motorway Alliance - Alliance learning experiences. Queensland Department of Main Roads.
10. Greenham, P. 2007. Alliancing. A glimpse of the real world view. Minter Ellison, Melbourne.
11. Halman, J. & Braks, B. 1999. Project alliancing in the offshore industry. International Journal of Project Management, 17(2), s. 71-76.
12. Hytönen, T. & Lehtomäki, L. 2007. Valtion hankintakäsikirja 2007. Julkaisuja 6/2007. Valtiovarainministeriö, Helsinki.
13. Jefferies, M., Brewer, G., Rowlinson, S., Cheung, F. & Satchell, A. 2006. Project alliances in the Australian construction industry: A case study of a water treatment project. In: McDermott, P. & Khalfan, M. (toim.) Symposium on sustainability and value through construction procurement, CIB W92, Salford, 29 Nov. - 2 Dec. 2006. S. 274-284.
14. Jefferies, M., Gameson, R. & Chen, S. 2000. Project alliance - factors for success. In: Serpell, A. (toim.) Information and Communication in Construction Procurement. CIB W92 Procurement System Symposium, Santiago, Chile, April 24-27. Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. CIB Publication 249. S. 313-328.
15. Keniger, M. & Walker, D. 2003. Developing a quality culture - Project alliancing versus business-as-usual (Chapter 8). In: Walker, D. and Hampson, K. (toim.) Procurement strategies. A relationship-based approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
16. Knott, T. 1996. No business as usual: An extraordinary North Sea result. The British Petroleum Company, London.
17. Koppinen, T. & Lahdenperä, P. 2004. The current and future performance of road project delivery methods. Espoo: VTT Publications 549. 115 p.
18. KPMG. 1998. Project alliances in the construction industry. Sydney, NSW Department of Public Works & Services.
19. Kumaraswamy, M., Ling, F., Rahman, M. & Phng, S. 2005. Constructing relationally integrated teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and management, 131(10), s. 1076-1086. (Pubitemid 41441431)
20. Lahdenperä, P. 2001. Design-Build Procedures. Introduction, illustration and comparison of U. S. modes. VTT, Espoo. VTT Publications 452. 175 s. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/publications/2001/P452.pdf
21. Lahdenperä, P. & Koppinen, T. 2003. Kannustavat maksuperusteet rakennushankkeessa. Osa 1: Kansainvälinen kartoitus. Espoo, VTT. VTT Tiedotteita 2191. 140 s. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2003/T2191.pdf
22. Lahdenperä, P. & Koppinen, T. 2004. Kannustavat maksuperusteet rakennushankkeessa. Osa 2: Laadittu kehysjärjestelmä. Espoo, VTT. VTT Tiedotteita 2244. 100 s. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2004/T2244.pdf
23. Lahdenperä, P. & Sulankivi, K. 2001. Monikriteerinen toteuttajan valinta rakennushankkeessa. Kansainvälinen kartoitus ja menetelmäperusta. Espoo, VTT. VTT Julkaisuja 855. 236 s. http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/julkaisut/2001/J855.pdf
24. Laki julkisista hankinnoista 30.3.2007/348. 2007. Edita, Helsinki.
25. Lin, M. 2005. GGP allinace value-for-money. Wellington, Transit New Zealand.
26. Manchester Business School. 2009. Study on voluntary arrangements for collaboration in construction (Part 1 & Part 2). Manchester Business School, Manchester.
27. Manley, K. 2002. Partnering and alliancing on road projects in Australia and internationally. Road and Transport Research, 11(3), s. 46-60.
28. Nyström, J. 2005. The definition of partnering as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept. Construction management and Economics, 23(5), s. 473-481. (Pubitemid 40974446)
29. Olds, R. 2002. Port Road Motorway alliance - A consultant's perspective. IRF/ARF Asia Pacific Roads Conference and Exhibition, 2002 Sydney, Australia. 10 s.
30. Pohjonen, M. 2007. Julkisten rakennushankintojen kilpailuttamisopas. Rakennusteollisuuden Kustannus RTK, Helsinki.
31. Rakentamisen Laatu RALA. 2008. [verkkosivusto] http://www.rala.fi
32. Ross, J. 2003a. Introduction to project alliancing (on engineering and construction projects). Project Control International (PCI), Sydney.
33. Ross, J. 2003b. Project alliancing - a strategy for avoiding and overcoming adversity. In: World Project Management Week, 24-28 March, 2003, Gold Coast, Australia.
34. Ross, J. 2004. Making sure a project alliance delivers on its promise. In: IQPC Alliance Contracting Conference, 26-27 October, 2004, Melbourne, Australia.
35. Ross, J. 2006. Project alliancing. Practitioners' guide. The Department of Treasury and Finance, State of Victoria, Melbourne.
36. Ross, J. 2008. Price competition in the alliance selection process. 9 reasons why I favour the single DCT approach - a personal perspective. Pre-reading for Infrastructure Delivery alliance Forum, Perth, 9 April, 2008. Main Roads Western Australia, East Perth.
37. RT 13-10574. 1995. Konsulttitoiminnan yleiset sopimusehdot, KSE 1995. Rakennustieto, Helsinki.
38. RT 16-10660. 1998. Rakennusurakan yleiset sopimusehdot YSE 1998. Rakennustieto, Helsinki.
39. Sakal, M. 2005. Project alliancing: A relational contracting mechanism for dynamic projects. Lean Construction Journal, 2(1), s. 67-79.
40. Scott, B. 2001. Partnering in Europe. Incentive based alliancing for projects. Thomas Telford, London.
41. Skinner, D. & Neale, M. 2003. Leveraging Contracting models that will maximise value for money. IGPC Alliance Contracting Conference, 2003, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 13 s.
42. Steele, G. 2002. Alliancing for motorways - flavour of the month or here for the long haul? IRF/ARF Asia Pacific Roads Conference & Exhibition. Sydney, Australia, 2002.
43. Tanner, V. 1998. Quality makes the grade at Chiba. Design-Build, January 1998.
44. Thomsen, C. 2006. Project delivery processes. 3D/I, Houston. 53 s.
45. Thorpe, D. & Dugdale, G. 2004. Use of alliance contracting for delivering local government engineering projects. Paper presented at: Clients driving innovation international conference, 13-14 March, 2004, Gold Coast. Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Construction Innovation, Brisbane. 12 s.
46. Turner, J. & Simister, S. 2001. Project contract management and a theory of organization. International Journal of Project Management, 19(8), s. 457-464. (Pubitemid 32949380)
47. VicRoads. 2005. Request for Proposals. Tullamarine - Calder Interchange Project. Contract No. 6212. VicRoads, Kew, VIC.
48. VicRoads. 2006. Request for Proposal. Middleborough Road Rail Separation Project. Contract No. 6530. VicRoads, Mitcham, VIC.
49. Walker, D. & Hampson, K. 2003a. Enterprise networks, partnering and alliancing (Chapter 3). In: Walker, D. & Hampson, K. (toim.) Procurement strategies. A relationship-based approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
50. Walker, D. & Hampson, K. 2003b. (toim.) Procurement strategies. A relationship-based approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
51. Walker, D., Hampson, K., & Peters, R. 2002. Project alliancing vs project partnering: a case study of the Australian National museum project. Supply Chain Management, 7(2), s. 83-91. (Pubitemid 38947727)
52. Wandoo B offshore oil platform. 1997. Leighton Contractors and/or Ove Arup.
53. Yeung, J., Chan, A. & Chan, D. 2007. The definition of alliancing in construction as a Wittgenstein family-resemblance concept. International Journal of Project Management, 25, s. 219-231. (Pubitemid 46323424)