Airspace in a green economy

UCLA Law Review

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 270-320

  Rule, Troy A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052616766     PISSN: 00415650     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. U.S. Energy Consumption by Energy Source, U.S. ENERGY INFO. ADMIN. (Aug. 2010), httpy/www.eia.doe.gov/cneaCsolar.renewables/page/trends/tablel.html
2. Human and Natural Drivers of Climate Change, INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE, httpy/www.ipcc.ch/publications-and-data/ar4/wgl/en/spmsspm- human-and.html
3. Neil King, Keith Johnson, An Oil-Thirsty America Dived Into Dead Sea,' WALL ST. J., Oct. 8, 2010, http://online.wsj.eom/article/ SB10001424052748704657304575540063579696700.html
4. Sara C. Bronin, Solar Rights, 89 B.U. L. REV. 1217,1236 (2009)
5. NEB. REV. STAT. & 66-907 (2003)
6. R.I. GEN. LAWS & 34-40-1(2) (1995)).
7. Alice Kasvran, Climate Change, Consumption, and Cities, 36 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 253,258-66 (2009)
8. Bernard H. Siegan, Smart Growth and Other Infirmities of Land Use Controls, 38 SAN DiEGO L. REV. 693, 733 (2001)
9. Irus Braverman, 'Everybody Loves Trees': Policing American Cities Through Street Trees, 19 DUKE ENVTL. L. 8C POLV F. 81, 82 (2008)
10. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx.'DocumentID=7244
11. http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoiyID=19
12. Catherine J. LaCroix, Urban Agriculture and Other Green Uses: Remaking the Shrinking City, 42 URB. LAW. 225, 237 (2010)
13. Hadassah M. Reimer & Sandra A. Snodgrass, Tortoises, Bats, and Birds, Oh My: Protected-Species Implications for Renewable Energy Projects, 46 IDAHO L. REV. 545, 564 (2010)
14. Elisabeth Burleson, Wind Power, National Security, and Sound Energy Policy, 17 PENN. ST. ENVTL. L. REV. 137,141-43 (2009).
15. Troy Rule, A Downwind View of the Cathedral: Using Rule Four to Allocate Wind Rights, 46 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 207, 209-10 (2009)
16. J. Scott Hamilton, Allocation of Airspace as a Scarce National Resource, 22 TRANSP. L.J. 251, 289 (1994)
17. httpy/www.nytimes.com/2005/ll/30/nyregion/30air.htnil
18. John Cobb Cooper, Roman Law and the Maxim Cujus Est Solum in International Air Law, 1 MCGiLL L.J. 23, 36 (1952)
19. B. Harrison Frankel, Three-Dimensional Real Property Law The Truth About 'Air Rights,' 12 REAL EST. L.J. 330, 340 (1984)
20. Garrett Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons, 162 SCIENCE 1243,1245 (1968)
21. Hector Judez, Sound, ORACLE EDUC. FOUND., http://libraiy.thinkquest.org/ 10796/ch9/ch9.htm (last visited Oct. 6, 2011)
22. http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know-ll/emspectrum.html
23. See, e.g., Roscoe M. Moore, III, Business-Driven Negotiations for Satellite System Coordination: Reforming the International Telecommunication Union to Increase Commercially Oriented Negotiations Over Scarce Frequency Spectrum, 65 J. AIR L. & COM. 51, 55-60 (1999).
24. Hannah Wiseman, Expanding Regional Renewable Governance, 35 HARV. ENVTL. L. REV. 477 (2011)
25. Carol M. Rose, Rethinking Environmental Controls: Management Strategies for Common Resources, 1991 DUKE L.J. 1, 17
26. 26 U.S.C. & 48 (2006)
27. DATABASE OF STATE INCENTIVES FOR RENEWABLES 8C EFFICIENCY, http://www.dsireusa.org [hereinafter DSIRE] (last visited Oct. 6, 2011)
28. Harold Demsetz, Toward a Theory of Property Rights, 57 AM. ECON. REV. 347,350 (1967)
29. Amnon Lehavi, Mixing Property, 38 SETON HALL L. REV. 137,143 (2008)
30. See Henry E. Smith, Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relation Between Ends and Means in American Property Law, 94 CORNELL L. REV. 959, 981 (2009)
31. See Eugene J. Morris, Air Rights Are 'Fertile Soil,' 1 URB. LAW. 247, 250 (1969)
32. S. Ball, The Vertical Extent of Ownership in Land, 76 U. PA. L. REV. 631 (1928).
33. BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 453 (4th ed. 1968).
34. WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAW OF ENGLAND 8 (19th ed. 1836)
35. See ROBERT R. WRIGHT, THE LAW OF AIRSPACE 34 (1968)
36. See Henry E. Smith, Exclusion Versus Governance: Two Strategies for Delineating Property Rights, 31 J. LEGAL STUD. 453, 455 (2002)
37. See Heniy E. Smith, Exclusion and Property Rules in the Law of Nuisance, 90 VA. L. REV. 965, 984 (2004)
38. See R.H. Coase, The Problem of Social Cost, 3 J.L. & ECON. 1, 2-8
39. See John Edward Cribbet, Concepts in Transition: The Search for a New Definition of Property, 1986 U. III. L. REV. L, 3
40. STUART BANNER, WHO OWNS THE SKY? 85-100 (2008).
41. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1977)
42. 328 U.S. 256 (1946).
43. Pickering v. Rudd, 4 Camp. 219,171 Eng. Rep. 70 (1815)
44. The Air Space as Corporeal Realty, 29 HARV. L. REV. 525 (1916)
45. See 14 C.F.R. & 77.17 (2009).
46. CW, 328 U.S. at 264.
47. 49 U.S.C. & 40103 (2) (2006)
48. H. Scott Gordon, The Economic Theory of a Common-Property Resource: The Fishery, 62 J. POL. ECON. 124 (1954).
49. See Robert C. Euickson, Property in Land, 102 YALE L.J. 1315, 1363-64 (1993)
50. See Michael R. Montgomery, Keeping the Tenants Down: Height Restrictions and Manhattan's Tenement House System, 1885-1930, 22 CATO J. 495,499 (2003)
51. John R. Nolon, The Law of Sustainable Development: Keeping Pace, 30 PACE L. REV. 101, 109 (2010)
52. Buder v. Frontier Tel. Co., 186 N.Y. 486, 491 (1906)
53. Terence Kennedy, New York City Zoning Resolution Section 12-10: A Third Phase in the Evolution of Airspace Law, 11 FORDHAMURB. LJ. 1039,1044 (1983).
54. Daniel P. Moskowitz, Legal Access to Light: The Solar Energy Imperative, 9 NAT. RESOURCES LAW. 177,184 (1976))).
55. Public Spaces, 15 URB. LAW. 347, 350 (1983)
56. Welch v. Swasey, 214 U.S. 91, 106 (1909)
57. Troy A. Rule, Shadows on the Cathedral: Solar Access Laws in a Different Light, 2010 U. ILL. L. REV. 851, 857-58, 873-80.
58. Bemadette Del Chiaro & Rachel Gibson, Government's Role in Creating a Vibrant Solar Power Market in California, 36 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. 347, 353 (2006).
59. http://www.nrel.gov/leaming/re-passive-solar.html
60. NAT'L RENEWABLE ENERGY LAB., at v (Mar. 2009), http://www.nrel.gov/docs/ 9osti/44853.pdf
61. APS RENEWABLE ENERGY INCENTIVE PROGRAM, http://www.aps.com/main/green/ choice/choice-41.html (last visited Oct. 12, 2011)
62. See David Mears, Feasibility of Residential Wind Energy: The Lack of Regulatory Integration for Local Communities, 37 REAL EST. L.J. 133,137 (2008)
63. Troy A. Rule, Renewable Energy and the Neighbors, 2010 UTAH L. REV. 1223,1239.
64. Stephen Sussna, Another Look at Height Regulations and Air Rights, 57 APPRAISAL J. 109, 117 (1989)
65. See Charles V. Bagli, Unwelcome Neighbor for Empire State Building, N.Y. TIMES, Aug. 25, 2010
66. See Sabrina Tavernise, In the Capital, Rethinking Old Limits on Buildings, N.Y. TIMES, Nov. 3, 2010, http://www.nytimes.eom/2010/ll/04/us/ 04buildings.html
67. http/www.sustland.umn.edu/design/energysaving.html
68. U.S. ENVTL. PROT. AGENCY, http://www.epa.gov/sequestration/sequestration- rates.html (last updated June 22, 2010)
69. See Richard A. Epstein, A Clear View The Cathedral- The Dominance of Property Rules, 106 Yale L.J. 2091, 2093-96 (1997)
70. Brett M. Frischmann, An Economic Theory of Infrastructure and Commons Management, 89 MINN. L. REV. 917, 951 (2005)
71. ELINOR OSTROM ET AL., RULES, GAMES, AND COMMON-POOL RESOURCES 6 (1994)
72. Michael A. Heller, The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition From Marx to Markets, 111 HARV. L. REV. 621 (1998).
73. Lee Anne Fennell, Common Interest Tragedies, 98 Nw. U. L. REV. 907, 926 (2004).
74. Richard J. Amott James MacKinnon, Measuring the Costs of Height Restrictions With a General Equilibrium Model, 1 REGIONAL SCI. URB. ECON. 359 (1977)
75. See Ernest E. Smith Becly H. Diffen, Winds of Change: The Creation of Wind law, 5 TEX. J. OIL GAS ENERGY L. 165, 186 (2010)
76. http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/75/l/012049/pdf.jpconf7-75-012049.pdf
77. Martin Mechali etal.. Wake Effects at Horns Rev and Their Irfluence on Energy Production, EWEC (2006), http://www.dongenergy.eom/ SiteCollectionDocuments/NEW%20Corporate/PDF/Engineering/40.pdf
78. http://www.siemetis.conaAumcTOtion/en/news/2010/clirect-clrive-vvind- tuibine-ruces-compleM
79. See ROBERT C. ELLICKSON, ORDER WITHOIIT LAW : HOW NEIGHBORS SETTLE DISPUTES 273 (1991).
80. See Herbert Hovenkamp, Rationality in Law & EconomUs, 60 GEO. WASH. L. REV. 293, 298 (1992)
81. 328 U.S. 256 (1946).
82. http://www.powernaturally.org/programs/wind/toolkit/9-windturbinetech. pdf.
83. See Kate Galbraith, Gulf Coast Wind Farms Spring Up, as Do Worries, N.Y. TIMES, Feb. 11, 2011
84. Procedures for HandUng Airspace Matters, FAA Order No. JO 7400.2H (Mar. 10, 2011)
85. Michael Brenner et al.. Wind Farms and Radar, FED'N AM. SCIENTISTS, Jan. 2008, at 8-9, available at http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/dod/Jason/wind.pdf
86. Ashira Pelman Ostrow, fhvcess Preemption in Federal Siting Regimes, 48 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 289 (2011)
87. Garrick B. Pursley Hannah J. Wiseman, Local Energy, 60 EMORY L.J. 877 (2011)
88. See Guido Calabresi, The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis 135 (1970)
89. see also RICHARD A. POSNER, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW 190 (7th ed. 2007)
90. STEVEN SHAVELL, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENT LAW 17 (1987)
91. WYO. STAT. ANN. & 34-22-102
92. See N.M. STAT. ANN. & 47-3-9
93. WYO. STAT. ANN. & 34-22-106.
94. N.M. STAT. ANN. & 47-3-3.
95. WYO. S TAT. ANN. & 34-22-102
96. N.M. STAT. ANN. & 47-3-8.
97. See Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 555 (1963)
98. N.M. STAT. ANN. & 47-3-4.
99. GAIL BOYER HAYES, SOLAR ACCESS LAW: PROTECTING ACCESS TO SUNLIGHT FOR SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS 187-92 (1979).
100. MASS. GEN. LAWS ANN. ch. 40A, & 9B (LexisNexis 2006)
101. See ASHLAND, OR., MUN. CODE & 18.70-140 (2009)
102. See BOULDER, COLO., REV. CODE 1981 & 9-9-17(d) (Supp. 2009)
103. Carl J. Circo, Does Sustainability Require a New Theory of Property Rights?, 58 U. KAN. L. REV. 91,116 (2009)
104. See Vicki Been, What's Fairness Got to Do With It? Environmental Justice and the Siting of Locally Undesirable Land Uses, 78 CORNELL L. REV. 1001,1077 (1993)
105. See ROBERT C. ELUCKSON VICKI L. BEEN, LAND USE CONTROLS 778 (2005)
106. http://www.nasa.gov/topics/technology/features/capturingwind.html