Optimization of treatment strategy used during shockwave lithotripsy to maximize stone fragmentation efficiency

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1507-1511

  Yong, Daniel Z ^a   Lipkin, Michael E ^a   Simmons, W Neal ^b   Sankin, Georgy ^b   Albala, David M ^a   Zhong, Pei ^b   Preminger, Glenn M ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAMERA; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FIBER OPTICS; IN VITRO STUDY; KIDNEY PELVIS; PHANTOM; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; WAVEFORM;

HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80052614732     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0732     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Zhou Y, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P. The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 2004;172:349-354.
2. McAteer JA, Bailey MR, Williams JC Jr, et al. Strategies for improved shock wave lithotripsy. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2005;57:271-287. (Pubitemid 41746067)
3. Sankin GN, Simmons WN, Zhu SL, Zhong P. Shock wave interaction with laser-generated single bubbles. Phys Rev Lett 2005;95:034501.
4. Klaseboer E, Fong SW, Turangan CK, et al. Interaction of lithotripter shockwaves with single inertial cavitation bubbles. J Fluid Mech 2007;593:33-56. (Pubitemid 350186785)
5. Liu Y, Zhong P. BegoStone-a new stone phantom for shock wave lithotripsy research. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;112: 1265-1268.
6. Zhong P, Zhou Y. Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: Methodology and in vitro experiments. J Acoust Soc Am 2001;110:3283-3291. (Pubitemid 33144327)
7. Zhou Y, Zhong P. Suppression of large intraluminal bubble expansion in shock wave lithotripsy without compromising stone comminution: Refinement of reflector geometry. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;113:586-597. (Pubitemid 36105707)
8. Qin J, Simmons WN, Sankin G, Zhong P. Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 2010;127:2635-2645.
9. Egilmez T, Tekin MI, Gonen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: Experience with 2670 patients. J Endourol 2007;21:23-27.
10. Zhu S, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P. The role of stress waves and cavitation in stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:661-671. (Pubitemid 34665424)
11. Zhong P, Chuong CJ, Preminger GM. Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. II: Application in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:29-36. (Pubitemid 23206521)
12. Zhong P, Chuong CJ. Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. I: Theoretical formulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:19-28. (Pubitemid 23206520)
13. Weir MJ, Tariq N, Honey RJ. Shockwave frequency affects fragmentation in a kidney stone model. J Endourol 2000;14:547-550.
14. Greenstein A, Matzkin H. Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? Urology 1999;54:430-432. (Pubitemid 29407015)
15. Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, et al. Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: Studies with a new animal model. J Urol 2002;168:2211-2215.
16. Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR. The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: A metaanalysis. J Urol 2008;179:194-197. (Pubitemid 350216760)
17. Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, et al. Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: In vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol 2006;20:537-541. (Pubitemid 44689637)
18. Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr. Effect of firing rate on the performance of shock wave lithotriptors. BJU Int 2008;102:1681-1686.
19. Maloney ME, Marguet CG, Zhou Y, et al. Progressive increase of lithotripter output produces better in-vivo stone comminution. J Endourol 2006;20:603-606. (Pubitemid 46140977)
20. Harvey EN, Barnes DK, McElroy WD, et al. Bubble formation in animals I. Physical factors. J Cell Compar Physl. Aug 1944;24(1):1-22.
21. Harvey EN, McElroy WD, Whiteley AH, et al. Bubble formation in animals III. An analysis of gas tension and hydrostatic pressure in cats. J Cell Compar Physl 1944;24: 117-132.
22. Harvey EN, Whiteley AH, McElroy WD, et al. Bubble formation in animals II. Gas nuclei and their distribution in blood and tissues. J Cell Compar Physl 1944;24:23-34.
23. Arora M, Junge L, Ohl CD. Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: Part 1. Free field. Ultrasound Med Biol 2005;31:827-839. (Pubitemid 40776081)
24. Borkent BM, Arora M, Ohl CD. Reproducible cavitation activity in water-particle suspensions. J Acoust Soc Am 2007;121:1406-1412. (Pubitemid 46555405)
25. Borkent BM, Gekle S, Prosperetti A, Lohse D. Nucleation threshold and deactivation mechanisms of nanoscopic cavitation nuclei. Phys Fluids 2009;21:1020031-1020039.
26. Weizer AZ, Zhong P, Preminger GM. New concepts in shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Clin North Am 2007;34:375-382. (Pubitemid 47189603)
27. Demirci D, Sofikerim M, Yalcin E, et al. Comparison of conventional and step-wise shockwave lithotripsy in management of urinary calculi. J Endourol 2007;21:1407-1410.
28. Lambert EH, Walsh R, Moreno MW, Gupta M. Effect of escalating versus fixed voltage treatment on stone comminution and renal injury during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: A prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2010;183:580-584.
29. You D, Park J, Hong B, Park HK. Effect of output voltage distribution on stone comminution efficiency during shockwave lithotripsy in renal or ureteropelvic junction stones: A preliminary study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2010;44:236-241.
30. Honey RJ, Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT. Shock wave lithotripsy: A randomized, double-blind trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation. Urology 2010;75:38-43.
31. Handa RK, Bailey MR, Paun M, et al. Pretreatment with lowenergy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): A treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury. BJU Int 2009;103:1270-1274.