Distribution patterns of coarse, fine and ultrafine atmospheric aerosol particulate matters in major cities of chhattisgarh

Indian Journal of Environmental Protection

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 184-197

  Deshmukh, D K ^a   Deb, Manas Kanti ^a   Verma, S K ^a  

^a PT RAVISHANKAR SHUKLA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Coarse; Fine and ultrafine particles; Industrial city; Mass concentration; Non industrial city

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052608572     PISSN: 02537141     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alatuev, A., et al. 2004. Monitoring of atmospheric particulate matter around sources of secondary inorganic aerosol. Atmos. Env., 38(30): 4979-4992.
2. Bosco, M.L., et al. 2005. Case study: Inorganic pollutants associated with particulate matter from an area near a petrochemical plant. Env. Res., 99(1): 18-30.
3. Cachier, H., et al. 2005. Aerosol studies during the ESCOMPTE experiment : An overview. Atmos. Res., 74(1-4): 547-563. (Pubitemid 40280691)
4. Chan, L.Y., et al. 2001. Spatial variation of mass concentration of roadside suspended particulate matter in metropolitan Hong Kong. Atmos. Env., 35(18): 3167-3176.
5. Gao, J., et al. 2009. Measurement of aerosol number size distributions in the Yangtze river delta in China: Formation and growth of particles under polluted conditions. Atmos. Env., 43(4): 829-836.
6. 2.5 concentrations based on long-term Swiss monitoring data. Atmos. Env., 37(19): 2571-2580.
7. 10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP-project. Atmos. Env., 38(24): 3917-3934.
8. Heal, M.R., et al. 2005. Interpretation of variations in fine, coarse and black smoke particulate matter concentrations in a northern European city. Atmos. Env., 39(20): 3711-3718.
9. 2.5 concentrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Results from the Cesar study. Atmos. Env., 35(15): 2757-2771.
10. Hughes, L.S., et al. 1998. Physical and chemical characterization of atmospheric ultrafine particles in the Los Angeles area. Env. Sci. Tech., 32(9): 1153-1161. (Pubitemid 28208676)
11. Keywood, M.D., et al. 1999. Relationship between size segregated mass concentration data and ultrafine particle number concentrations in urban areas. Atmos. Env., 33(18): 2907-2913. (Pubitemid 29222765)
12. Kleeman, M.J., et al. 1998. Source contributions to the size and composition distribution of urban particulate air pollution. Atmos. Env., 32(16): 2803-2816. (Pubitemid 28349852)
13. Kouyoymdjian, H., et al. 2006. Mass concentration and ion composition of coarse and fine particles in a urban area in Beirut: Effect of calcium carbonate on the adsorption of nitric and sulphuric acids and the depletion of chloride. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6(7): 1865-1877.
14. 2.5 measured at Tockchok Island in the Yellow Sea. Atmos. Env., 36(35): 5427-5435.
15. Lin, J.J., et al. 2004. Characterization of the concentration and distribution of urban submicron (PM1) aerosol particles. Atmos. Env., 38(3): 469-475. (Pubitemid 37491375)
16. Mori, I., et al. 2003. Change in size distribution and chemical composition of Kosa (Asian dust) aerosol during long-range transport. Atmos. Env., 37(30): 4253-4263. (Pubitemid 37013487)
17. 10) at a semiarid urban site: Influence of terrestrial sources. Env. Monitor. Assess., 117(1-3): 291-305.
18. Namdeo, A., et al. 2005. Characteristics and health implications of fine and coarse particulates at roadside, urban background and rural sites in UK. Env. Int., 31(4): 565-573.
19. Niemi, J.V., et al. 2005. Characterization of aerosol particles episodes in Finland caused by wildfires in Eastern Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5(8): 2299-2310. (Pubitemid 41520105)
20. 10 concentration 30 hr. in advance in Sentiago, Chile. Atmos. Env., 36 (28): 4555-4561.
21. 2.5 around primary particulate anthropogenic emission sources. Atmos. Env., 35(5): 845-858.
22. Rodriguez, S., et al. 2004. Comparative PM10-PM2.5 source contribution study at rural, urban and industrial sites during PM episodes in eastern Spain. Sei. Total Env., 328(1-3): 95-113.
23. \Salma, L, et al. 2004. Elemental and organic carbon in urban canyon and background environments in Budapest, Hungary. Atmos. Env., 38(1): 27-36.
24. 2.5 at a coastal site in Beirut, Lebanon. Atmos. Env., 38(4): 523-531.
25. 10 in the city of Kanpur. Atmos. Env., 39(33): 6015-6026.
26. 2.5 aerosol water content and chemical composition in a metropolitan and a coastal area in southern Taiwan. Atmos. Env., 39(27): 4827-4839.
27. 10 in a subarctic urban atmosphere. Env. Sci. Tech., 34(10): 1919-1925.
28. Verma, S.K., et al. 2009. Ion chemistry and source identification of coarse and fine aerosols in an urban area of eastern central India. Atmos. Res., In press.
29. Wahid, A., et al. 2006. Productivity losses in barley attributable to ambient atmospheric pollutants in Pakistan. Atmos. Env., 40(28): 5342-5354. (Pubitemid 44190185)
30. 2.5 atmospheric aerosols in five locations of Nanjing, China. Atmos. Env., 37(21): 2893-2902.
31. Wang, H., et al. 2005. Carbonaceous and ionic components in wintertime atmospheric aerosols from two New Zealand, cities: Implications for solid fuel combustion. Atmos. Env., 39(32): 5865-5875. (Pubitemid 41278663)