Comparative performance of precommercial cellulases hydrolyzing pretreated corn stover

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages

  McMillan, James D ^a   Jennings, Edward W ^a   Mohagheghi, Ali ^a   Zuccarello, Mildred ^a  

^a NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICINCHONINIC ACIDS; BIOCHEMICAL CONVERSION; BRADFORD ASSAYS; CELLULOSE CONVERSION; CELLULOSIC BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS; CONSENSUS METHODS; CONVERSION YIELD; CORN STOVER; COST FACTORS; DANISCO; ENZYME DOSAGE; ENZYME SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; GLUCOSE CONVERSION; GLUCOSE YIELDS; HYDROLYTIC ENZYME; IS COSTS; NOVOZYMES; PERFORMANCE LEVEL; PROTEIN ASSAYS; PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS; PROTEIN LOADINGS; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; TEST CONDITION; TOTAL PROTEIN; US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY;

CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; PROTEINS; SACCHARIFICATION;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; HYDROLYSIS; MAIZE; PROTEIN;

BIOCHEMISTRY; BIOMASS; CELLULASE; CORN; ENZYMOLYSIS; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; PROTEINS; SACCHARIFICATION;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 80052607331     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-29     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Overview and evaluation of fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass: technology, economics, the environment, and policy. LR Lynd, Ann Rev Energy Environ 1996 21 403 465 10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.403 (Pubitemid 126503795)
2. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. P Alvira, E Tomás-Pejá M Ballesteros, MJ Negro, Bioresour Technol 2010 101 4851 4861 10.1016/j.biortech. 2009.11.093 20042329
3. Review: continuous hydrolysis and fermentation for cellulosic ethanol production. S Brethauer, CE Wyman, Bioresour Technol 2010 101 4862 4874 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.009 20006926
4. A Aden, M Ruth, KN Ibsen, J Jechura, K Neeves, J Sheehan, B Wallace, L Montague, A Slayton, J Lukas, Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing concurrent dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover NREL Technical Report TP-510-32438. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2002 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/ 32438.pdf
5. Dilute-sulfuric acid pretreatment of corn stover in pilot scale reactor-Investigation of yields, kinetics and enzymatic digestibilities of solids. DJ Schell, J Farmer, M Newman, JD McMillan, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003 105 69 85 10.1385/ABAB:105:1-3:69 12721476 (Pubitemid 36537772)
6. Economic impact of total solids loading on enzymatic hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated corn stover. D Humbird, A Mohagheghi, N Dowe, DJ Schell, Biotechnol Prog 2010 26 1245 1251 10.1002/btpr.441 20945482
7. Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment. RT Elander, BE Dale, M Holtzapple, MR Ladisch, YY Lee, C Mitchinson, JN Saddler, CE Wyman, Cellulose 2009 16 649 659 10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y
8. Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. CE Wyman, BE Dale, RT Elander, M Holtzapple, MR Ladisch, YY Lee, C Mitchinson, JN Saddler, Biotechnol Prog 2009 25 333 339 10.1002/btpr.142 19294662
9. Enzyme-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. MJ Taherzadeh, K Karimi, BioResources 2007 2 707 738
10. Economic comparison of different fermentation configurations to convert corn stover to ethanol using Z. mobilis and Saccharomyces. A Dutta, N Dowe, KN Ibsen, DJ Schell, A Aden, Biotechnol Prog 2010 26 64 72 19785041
11. Enzymes for biorefineries. SA Teter, F Xu, GE Nedwin, JR Cherry, Biorefineries-Industrial Processes and Products Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, Kamm B, Gruber PR, Kamm M, 2006 1 357 383
12. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. ST Merino, J Cherry, Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007 108 95 120 17594064 (Pubitemid 47434544)
13. Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol. A Aden, T Foust, Cellulose 2009 16 535 545 10.1007/s10570-009-9327-8
14. How biotech can transform biofuels. LR Lynd, MS Laser, D Bransby, BE Dale, B Davison, R Hamilton, M Himmel, M Keller, JD McMillan, J Sheehan, CE Wyman, Nat Biotechnol 2008 26 169 172 10.1038/nbt0208-169 18259168 (Pubitemid 351225943)
15. Corn stover conversion to biofuels: DOE's preparation for readiness in 2012. ME Himmel, Cellulose 2009 16 531 534 10.1007/s10570-009-9335-8
16. Cellulases and biofuels. DB Wilson, Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009 20 295 299 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.007 19502046
17. Biomass program multi-year program plan, November 2010. Anonymous, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/biomass-mypp-november2010.pdf
18. Biochemical production of ethanol from corn stover: 2008 state of technology model. D Humbird, A Aden, NREL Technical Report No. TP-510-46214. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2009
19. DOE to Invest $34 Million in Enzymes for Cellulosic Ethanol Production. Anonymous, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/news-detail.html? news-id=11604
20. Dissemination of research results on model system. US DOE, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) DE-PS36-07GO97034 'Development of Saccharifying Enzymes for Commercial Use' Washington, DC: US DOE 2007 Part VIII, Section J
21. Colorimetric protein assay techniques. CV Sapan, RL Lundblad, NC Price, Biotechnol Appl Biochem 1999 29 99 108 10075906 (Pubitemid 29178908)
22. A comparison of protein quantitation assays for biopharmaceutical applications. JE Noble, AE Knight, AJ Reason, A Di Matola, MJA Bailey, Mol Biotechnol 2007 37 99 111 10.1007/s12033-007-0038-9 17914170 (Pubitemid 350135895)
23. Quantitation of protein. JE Noble, MJA Bailey, Methods Enzymol 2009 463 73 95 19892168
24. Thermo Scientific Pierce Protein Assay Technical Handbook, Version 2. Thermo Fisher Scientific, http://www.piercenet.com/Files/1602063-PAssayHB- 122910.pdf
25. Comparison of protein content of cellulase preparations in a worldwide round-robin assay. WS Adney, A Mohagheghi, ST Thomas, ME Himmel, Enzymatic Degradation of Insoluble Carbohydrates ACS Symposium Series 1995 618 256 271 (Amer Chemical Soc, 1155 Sixteenth Street NW, Washington DC 20036)
26. Survey and analysis of commercial cellulase preparations suitable for biomass conversion to ethanol. RA Nieves, CI Ehrman, WS Adney, RT Elander, ME Himmel, World J Microbiol Biotechnol 1998 14 301 304 (Pubitemid 28167304)
27. Soluble and insoluble solids contributions to high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. DB Hodge, MN Karim, DJ Schell, JD McMillan, Bioresour Technol 2008 99 8940 8948 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.015 18585030
28. Determining yields in high solids enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. JB Kristensen, C Felby, H Jorgensen, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2008 156 557 562
29. Calculating sugar yields in high solids hydrolysis of biomass. M Zhu, M Malten, M Torry-Smith, JD McMillan, JJ Stickel, Bioresour Technol 2011 102 2897 2903 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.134 21109427
30. Assessing cellulase performance on pretreated lignocellulosic biomass using saccharification and fermentation-based protocols. N Dowe, http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical-procedures.html#lap-009
31. Automated filter paper assay for determination of cellulase activity. SR Decker, WS Adney, E Jennings, TB Vinzant, ME Himmel, Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2003 105-108 689 703 12721448
32. Measurement of cellulase activities. TK Ghose, Pure Appl Chem 1987 59 257 268 10.1351/pac198759020257
33. Measurement of cellulase activities. B Adney, J Baker, http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical-procedures.html#lap-013
34. Cellulolytic enzymes system of Trichoderma koningii. TM Wood, Biochem J 1968 109 217 5692804
35. Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods. JB Sluiter, RO Ruiz, CJ Scarlata, AD Sluiter, DW Templeton, J Agric Food Chem 2010 58 9043 9053
36. Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 2. Method uncertainties. DW Templeton, CJ Scarlata, JB Sluiter, EJ Wolfrum, J Agric Food Chem 2010 58 9054 9062