Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1179-1190

  Joiner, Wilsaan M ^a   Cavanaugh, James ^a   Wurtz, Robert H ^a  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Exogenous attention; Onset attention

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOVEAVIRUS; FRONTAL EYE FIELD; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SALIENCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANIMALS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80052599882     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01054.2010     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Balan PF, Gottlieb J. Integration of exogenous input into a dynamic salience map revealed by perturbing attention. J Neurosci 26: 9239-9249, 2006.
2. Balan PF, Oristaglio J, Schneider DM, Gottlieb J. Neuronal correlates of the set-size effect in monkey lateral intraparietal area. PLoS Biol 6: e158, 2008.
3. Bruce CJ, Goldberg ME. Primate frontal eye fields. I. Single neurons discharging before saccades. J Neurophysiol 53: 603-635, 1985.
4. Cohen JY, Heitz RP, Woodman GF, Schall JD. Neural basis of the set-size effect in frontal eye field: timing of attention during visual search. J Neurophysiol 101: 1699-1704, 2009.
5. Crist CF, Yamasaki DS, Komatsu H, Wurtz RH. A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording. J Neurosci Methods 26: 117-122, 1988.
6. Deubel H, Schneider WX, Bridgeman B. Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Res 36: 985-996, 1996.
7. Deubel H, Schneider WX, Bridgeman B. Transsaccadic memory of position and form. Prog Brain Res 140: 165-180, 2002.
8. Duhamel JR, Colby CL, Goldberg ME. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255: 90-92, 1992.
9. Duncan J, Humphreys GW. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychol Rev 96: 433-458, 1989.
10. Egeth HE, Yantis S. Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu Rev Psychol 48: 269-297, 1997.
11. Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18: 1030-1044, 1992.
12. Golomb JD, Chun MM, Mazer JA. The native coordinate system of spatial attention is retinotopic. J Neurosci 28: 10654-10662, 2008.
13. Gottlieb JP, Kusunoki M, Goldberg ME. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391: 481-484, 1998.
14. Hagenaar R, van der Heijden AH. Target-noise separation in visual selective attention. Acta Psychol (Amst) 62: 161-176, 1986.
15. Hays AV, Richmond BJ, Optican LM. A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control. WESCON Conf Proc 2: 1-10, 1982.
16. Heiser LM, Colby CL. Spatial updating in area LIP is independent of saccade direction. J Neurophysiol 95: 2751-2767, 2006.
17. Kahneman D, Treisman A, Burkell J. The cost of visual filtering. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9: 510-522, 1983.
18. Kim MS, Cave KR. Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: on the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Percept Psychophys 61: 1009-1023, 1999.
19. Koch C, Ullman S. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Hum Neurobiol 4: 219-227, 1985.
20. Kusunoki M, Goldberg ME. The time course of perisaccadic receptive field shifts in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey. J Neurophysiol 89: 1519-1527, 2003.
21. Kusunoki M, Gottlieb J, Goldberg ME. The lateral intraparietal area as a salience map: the representation of abrupt onset, stimulus motion, and task relevance. Vision Res 40: 1459-1468, 2000.
22. Mathot S, Hickey C, Theeuwes J. From reorienting of attention to biased competition: evidence from hemifield effects. Atten Percept Psychophys 72: 651-657, 2010.
23. Mathot S, Theeuwes J. Visual attention and stability. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366: 516-527, 2011.
24. Phillips MH, Goldberg ME. Remapped receptive fields have a different geometry from current receptive fields. Soc Neurosci Abstr 280.10, 2010.
25. Rensink RA, O'Regan JK, Clark JJ. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 8: 368-373, 1997.
26. Rodieck RW. Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Res 5: 585-601, 1965.
27. Schall JD, Hanes DP, Thompson KG, King DJ. Saccade target selection in frontal eye field of macaque. I. Visual and premovement activation. J Neurosci 15: 6905-6918, 1995.
28. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Brain circuits for the internal monitoring of movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 31: 317-338, 2008.
29. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Composition and topographic organization of signals sent from the frontal eye field to the superior colliculus. J Neurophysiol 83: 1979-2001, 2000.
30. Sommer MA, Wurtz RH. Influence of the thalamus on spatial visual processing in frontal cortex. Nature 444: 374-377, 2006.
31. Sperry RW. Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. J Comp Physiol Psychol 43: 482-489, 1950.
32. Thompson KG, Bichot NP. A visual salience map in the primate frontal eye field. Prog Brain Res 147: 251-262, 2005.
33. Thompson KG, Hanes DP, Bichot NP, Schall JD. Perceptual and motor processing stages identified in the activity of macaque frontal eye field neurons during visual search. J Neurophysiol 76: 4040-4055, 1996.
34. Umeno MM, Goldberg ME. Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. J Neurophysiol 78: 1373-1383, 1997.
35. von Holst E, Mittelstaedt Das Reafferenzprinzip H. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Zentralnervensystem und Peripherie. Naturwissenschaften 37: 464-476, 1950.
36. Wright RD, Richard CM. Sensory mediation of stimulus-driven attentional capture in multiple-cue displays. Percept Psychophys 65: 925-938, 2003.
37. Wurtz RH, Joiner WM, Berman RA. Neuronal mechanisms for visual stability: progress and problems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366: 492-503, 2011.