Social influence benefits the wisdom of individuals in the crowd

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 36, 2011, Pages

  Farrell, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; LIFE EVENT; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; WISDOM OF THE CROWD;

HUMANS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 80052598799     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109947108     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Lorenz J, Rauhut H, Schweitzer F, Helbing D (2011) How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9020-9025.
2. Rouder JN, Lu J, Speckman P, Sun D, Jiang Y (2005) A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychon Bull Rev 12:195-223. (Pubitemid 41137376)
3. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2004) Bayesian Data Analysis (Chapman & Hall, London), 2nd Ed.
4. Danchin E, Giraldeau LA, Valone TJ, Wagner RH (2004) Public information: From nosy neighbors to cultural evolution. Science 305:487-491. (Pubitemid 38971332)
5. Bakeman R, McArthur D (1996) Picturing repeated measures: Comments on Loftus, Morrison, and others. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 28:584-589. (Pubitemid 126416720)