Dynamic age-related changes of extracellular field potential of isolated AV-node of rabbit

Physiology and Pharmacology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 173-181

  Khori, Vahid ^a   Alizadeh, Ali Mohammad ^b   Niknam, Mahsa ^a   Moheimani, Hamid Reza ^d   Yazdi, Hamid Reza ^a   pourabouk, Mona ^a   Badaghabadi, Fakhri ^a   Changizi, Shima ^a   Rajaei, Maryam ^a   Nayebpour, Mohsen ^c  

^a GOLESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^d NONE

Author keywords

Age; AV node; Electrophysiology; Frequency dependent properties; Recovery

Indexed keywords

AGING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FATIGUE; HEART ATRIOVENTRICULAR NODE; HEART ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; ADULT; AGE; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL PARAMETERS; FACILITATION; HEART MUSCLE REFRACTORY PERIOD; MAXIMAL ATRIO HIS CONDUCTION INTERVAL; WENCHEBACH CYCLE LENGTH;

EID: 80052589558     PISSN: 17350581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Blaufox AD, Rhodes JF, Fishberger SB. Age related changes in dual AV nodal physiology. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23 (4 Pt 1): 477-80.
2. Blurton DJ, Dubin AM, Chiesa NA, Van Hare GF, Collins KK. Characterizing dual atrioventricular nodal physiology in pediatric patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17 (6): 638-44.
3. CHI-TAI KUO, JING-MING WU, KUO-HONG LIN, MING-LON YOUNG. The Effects of Aging on AV Nodal Recovery Properties. J Pacing Clinical Electrophysiol 2001; 24 (2): 194-198.
4. Cohen MI, Wieand TS, Rhodes LA, Vetter VL. Electrophysiologic properties of the atrioventricular node in pediatric patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 29 (2): 403-7.
5. Lee PC, Hwang B, Tai CT, Chiang CE, Chen SA. The different ablation effects on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with and without dual nodal pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006; 29 (6): 60-6. (6): 60-6.
6. Lin MH, Young ML, Wu JM, Wolff GS. Developmental changes of atrioventricular nodal recovery properties. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80 (9): 1178-82.
7. Nayebpour M, Naseri M, Khori V. Effects of ajmaline on rate-dependent atrioventricular node properties. Potential role in experimental atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001; 412 (1): 77-89.
8. Van Hare GF. Developmental aspects of atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia. J Electrocardiol. 2008; 41 (6): 480-2.
9. Van Hare GF, Chiesa NA, Campbell RM, Kanter RJ, Cecchin F; Pediatric Electrophysiology Society. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children: effect of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002; 13 (3): 203-9.
10. Waki K, Kim JS, Becker AE. Morphology of the human atrioventricular node is age dependent: a feature of potential clinical significance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000; 11 (10): 1144-51.