Pharmacists subjected to disciplinary action: Characteristics and risk factors

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 367-373

  Phipps, Denham L ^a   Noyce, Peter R ^a   Walshe, Kieran ^b   Parker, Dianne ^a,c   Ashcroft, Darren M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Safety Culture Associates Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

disciplinary action; fitness to practice; regulation; risk assessment; risk factors; RPSGB

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MALE; MALPRACTICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHARMACIST ATTITUDE; PHARMACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICS; TRAINING; WORK;

ADULT; AGED; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MALPRACTICE; MIDDLE AGED; PHARMACISTS; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 80052588703     PISSN: 09617671     EISSN: 20427174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2011.00119.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Phipps D, et al,. What factors should you focus on to provide meaningful risk assessments? Pharm J 2010; 284: 312.
2. Department of Health. The Regulation of the Non-Medical Healthcare Professions. Leeds: Department of Health, 2006.
3. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Briatin. A Draft Model for Revalidation in Pharmacy: Report to the Department of Health. London: RPSGB, 2009.
4. Clay SW, Conatser RR,. Characteristics of physicians disciplined by the State Medical Board of Ohio. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2003; 103: 81-88. (Pubitemid 36268121)
5. Morrison J, Wickersham P,. Physicians disciplined by a state medical board. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279: 1889-1893. (Pubitemid 28299285)
6. Green A, et al,. Are you at risk for disciplinary action? Am J Nursing 1995; 95: 36-42.
7. Dehlendorf CE, Wolfe SM,. Physicians disciplined for sex-related offenses. J Am Med Assoc 1998; 279: 1883-1888. (Pubitemid 28299284)
8. Khaliq AA, et al,. Disciplinary action against physicians: who is likely to get disciplined? Am J Med 2005; 118: 773-777. (Pubitemid 40897664)
9. National Patient Safety Agency. NCAS Casework: The First Eight Years. London: National Patient Safety Agency, 2009.
10. Yates J, James D,. Risk factors at medical school for subsequent professional misconduct: multicentre case-control study. Br Med J 2010; 340: c2040.
11. Watts S,. Solo GPs Face More GMC Hearings. (accessed 22 July 2009).
12. Hickson GB, et al,. A complementary approach to promoting professionalism: identifying, measuring and addressing unprofessional behaviours. Acad Med 2007; 82: 1040-1048. (Pubitemid 350035788)
13. Papadakis MA, et al,. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. New Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-2682. (Pubitemid 41817716)
14. Papadakis MA, et al,. Performance during medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 869-876. (Pubitemid 351786931)
15. Carthey J, et al,. Development of a risk-based approach for the identification of advanced pharmacy practice. Report to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2007.
16. Phipps DL, et al,. Risk assessment in pharmacy practice. Report to the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2010.
17. Phipps DL, et al,. Risk-based regulation: what are the implications for pharmacy practice? Health Risk Soc 2011; 13: 277-292.
18. Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (Fitness to Practice and Disqualification Etc. Rules) Order of Council. SI 2007/442. London: HMSO, 2007.
19. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS,. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th edn. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
20. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Fitness to Practice: Annual Report 2008. London: RPSGB, 2009.
21. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. Fitness to Practice: Annual Report 2007. London: RPSGB, 2008.
22. Seston E, Hassell K,. Workforce update-joiners, leavers and practising and non-practising pharmacists on the 2009 register. Pharm J 2010; 284: 80-82.
23. National Clinical Assessment Service. A Review of the Extension of the National Clinical Assessment Service to Pharmacists. London: National Clinical Assessment Service, 2010.
24. Hassell K,. A study of Statutory Committee charges and ethnic origin. Pharm J 1996; 257: R43.
25. Phipps DL, et al,. Medication safety in community pharmacy: a qualitative study of the sociotechnical context. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 158.
26. Ziaei Z, et al,. Experiences of European trained pharmacists in Great Britain. Int J Pharm Pract 2010; 18 (Suppl. 1): 9-10.
27. Cox SJ, Holden JD,. Presentation and outcome of clinical poor performance in one health district over a 5-year period: 2002-2007. Br J Gen Pract 2009; 9: 344-348.