(Compressed) sensing and sensibility

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 108, Issue 36, 2011, Pages 14713-14714

  Pande, Vijay S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NOTE; PHYSICS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SENSITIVITY AND SENSIBILITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MODELS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 80052583392     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111659108     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Leach AR (2001) Molecular Modelling: Principles and Applications (Prentice Hall, New York), 2nd Ed.
2. Kresse G (1995) Ab-initio molecular-dynamics for liquidmetals. J Non-Cryst Solids 193:222-229.
3. AlQuraishi M, McAdams HH (2011) Direct inference of protein-DNA interactions using compressed sensingmethods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:14819-14824.
4. Sippl MJ (1995) Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5:229-235.
5. Das R (2011) Four small puzzles that Rosetta doesn't solve. PLoS ONE 6:e20044.
6. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (Springer, New York), 2nd Ed.
7. Donoho DL (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 52:1289-1306.
8. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM (2007) Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58:1182-1195. (Pubitemid 350234205)
9. Ponder JW, Case DA (2003) Force fields for protein simulations. Adv Protein Chem 66:27-85. (Pubitemid 37392314)